On July 26, 1822, Simon Bolivar and Jose de San Martin met to decide the future of South America, which they had both effectively liberated. Details are at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guayaquil_conference. They were unable to come to an agreement on the future shape of South America, and both left disappointed. San Martin retired, leaving his nations as a series of republics, whereas Bolivar's Gran Columbia collapsed after a few years.
So, what if the two men had managed to come to an agreement on the future United States of Latin America? Apparently, the disagreement was over whether it should be a republic or not; Bolivar favoured a republican government, whereas San Martin apparently favoured importing a European prince to be head of state. Bolivar's liberalism probably means San Martin is the only one who can conceivably back down. Could the nation survive, or is it as doomed as Gran Columbia was?
So, what if the two men had managed to come to an agreement on the future United States of Latin America? Apparently, the disagreement was over whether it should be a republic or not; Bolivar favoured a republican government, whereas San Martin apparently favoured importing a European prince to be head of state. Bolivar's liberalism probably means San Martin is the only one who can conceivably back down. Could the nation survive, or is it as doomed as Gran Columbia was?