Ok, so assuming all that (one has to make assumptions) then what are the various OOBs.
Without the R-J War its an interesting question what the state of WORLD naval warfare will be.
We can probably assume (that word again) the Dreadnought has come along as it is trending that way, but it might have been a year or so later, allowing the King Edward VII analogues to merge into the Lord Nelson analogues and then into the Dreadnought analogue, rather than sort of rush them altogether. In addition, some of the apparent lessons of Yellow Sea/TsuShima won't have been adopted, which might not be a bad thing!
Neither Russia nor Japan would have run into budget problems of the type that slowed their OTL battleship building plans, but though probably building more, they are probably building more final generation predreadnoughts - these may well not have the high-calibre intermediary guns, because these were an apparent "lesson" of the R-J War.
Paradoxically, this could mean that the first generation of Russian and Japanese dreadnoughts actually come earlier than OTL since the intermediate development is done away with, and with the later deployment date for Dreadnought it would allow other nations to be more closely following British design thought, and thus more able to make their own changes.
Even so you're probably looking at 1911 before the first Russian and Japanese dreadnoughts are ready, which would be interesting because Japan would have them in home waters, and Russia would only have them in the Baltic.
But the more numerous later generation predreadnoughts would be what are going to be fighting the main battles, together with more of the later generation armoured cruisers, a la Rurik
Best Regards
Grey Wolf