Which means no reason to give up their proven political system.Western europe didn't have the Rumsfeld Experience
Which means no reason to give up their proven political system.Western europe didn't have the Rumsfeld Experience
Which means no reason to give up their proven political system.
That's western europe though. The US OTL hasn't even been willing to copy basic things like healthcare reform from them, nevermind political systems in this TL.Which means no reason to give up their proven political system.
That's western europe though. The US OTL hasn't even been willing to copy basic things like healthcare reform from them, nevermind political systems in this TL.
the lessons they'd learn is that strict discipline, ideological unity and a state for and of(but not by, because they'd vote for conservatives/rumsfeld types) the workers is the answer. after all, the west europeans are paying danegeld to the russians and the USSR is rising...But again, it is likely that any future democracies that spring up will take lots of notes about the failure of the American political system ITTL. The fact that the leader of the free world was not immune to state decay will haunt the world for years to come.
the lessons they'd learn is that strict discipline, ideological unity and a state for and of(but not by, because they'd vote for conservatives/rumsfeld types) the workers is the answer. after all, the west europeans are paying danegeld to the russians and the USSR is rising...
Not... quite...How similar is this timelines Rumsfield to Our Timeline Rumsfield...like do they both believe in the same policies
Not similar at all. Gumboverse Rumsfeld is basically a parody of Reddit libertarianism-the kind that praises brutal dictators like Pinochet just because they left their precious free markets alone. OTL Rumsfeld was willing to tolerate Bush Jr.'s "compassionate conservatism". Gumboverse Rumsfeld would call Bush Jr. a filthy commie.How similar is this timelines Rumsfield to Our Timeline Rumsfield...like do they both believe in the same policies
You before the nukes are broken out? Not without a military coup. And even then, a civil war is probably inevitable at this point, thought if the CVers are couped, there wouldn't be any use of nukes, maybe.I'd like to shift gears here and ask, given all that has happened in this dystopic nightmare. Can it realistically be turned around at this point so that the U.S. can gain some semblance of restoration to the situation in OTL? Or is it simply too far gone for that to happen?
I thought a civil war was already happeningYou before the nukes are broken out? Not without a military coup. And even then, a civil war is probably inevitable at this point, thought if the CVers are couped, there wouldn't be any use of nukes, maybe.
So is there a reason for the radicalization of Rumsfield?Not similar at all. Gumboverse Rumsfeld is basically a parody of Reddit libertarianism-the kind that praises brutal dictators like Pinochet just because they left their precious free markets alone. OTL Rumsfeld was willing to tolerate Bush Jr.'s "compassionate conservatism". Gumboverse Rumsfeld would call Bush Jr. a filthy commie.
In-universe, Rumsfeld was radicalized by the Second Great Depression and the long period of political uncertainty during the Agnew, Gavin, and Wallace administrations. That sort of thing can change a person.So is there a reason for the radicalization of Rumsfield?
In-universe, Rumsfeld was radicalized by the Second Great Depression and the long period of political uncertainty during the Agnew, Gavin, and Wallace administrations. That sort of thing can change a person.
I'd like to shift gears here and ask, given all that has happened in this dystopic nightmare. Can it realistically be turned around at this point so that the U.S. can gain some semblance of restoration to the situation in OTL? Or is it simply too far gone for that to happen?
I watched this video in high school and it kind of reminds me of Rumsfeldia.
So if Bush or Reagan be considered Communist under Rumsfieldia...
would McCarthy be considered a Communist?
They could either have portrayed him as a great warrior who was destroyed by a communist conspiracy led by Dwight Eisenhower, or they could also slander him as a Soviet agent.