Rumsfeldia: Fear and Loathing in the Decade of Tears

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Hey," he would yell, "don't take the Lord's name in vain. The Lord I claim to serve."

This is the problem that comes from mixing religious conviction with temporal power: if you believe yourself to be a pure, divine servant, you can justify any wretched behavior. If your power is absolute, a lot of wretched things can and will occur.

And that in turn just might lead to wretched things being done to them in return by those they've harmed.
 
I really fear for what it must be like for children with disabilities under Rumsfeldia and later the CSA. I can already imagine the absolute horror it must of been for them.

Well, Drew did hint about what is in store for disabled people.

Thursday, December 15, 1983

A new version of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol is published in the United States. In this version Ebenezer Scrooge is a hard-working and honest capitalist beset by all sorts of people wanting money at Christmas. His clerk, Bob Cratchitt, is also lazy and greedy, a combination which leads him to steal from Scrooge and blame others for the crime. Crachitt’s son Tiny Tim is lame, but the narrative implies the family plays this up to win sympathy and receive welfare checks they don’t deserve because Bob Crachitt has a job.

In the spirit of the season Scrooge gives until it hurts. But then he is visited by the Spirit of Truth, which shows him that his generosity to the poor and assistance to others is part of a communist plot to undermine capitalism and freedom. Scrooge understands now that only by working hard and hoarding his money, spending it only on business and the market, can he help to preserve democracy and the free market. Scrooge also realizes that he must show charities as agents of anti-market and anti-freedom evil. He succeeds in doing just that with his nephew’s charity, turning orphans out into the winter’s cold on Christmas Day as this will “promote their freedom” and leave them “better positioned for success in the market.” At the end, having demonstrated that Tiny Tim’s continued existence is a direct danger to the Gross National Product, Scrooge sets out on a mission to end all charity everywhere.

To be more specific, the collapse of medical infrastructure, growing poverty, and cutbacks to health and welfare programs make the situation look very bleak indeed.

And that in turn just might lead to wretched things being done to them in return by those they've harmed.

I can imagine CV people, when they are about to be (or they think they are about to be) brutally murdered, they might do one of four things.

1) Cry and beg for mercy-like all snakes do when they have the sword pointed at them.

2) Loudly pray for God's to forgive the sins of his enemies-possibly in genuine last prayers, or to elicit some sympathy from their opponents.

3) Loudly berate their opponent, calming them the spawn of Satan.

4) Kill themselves.
 

CalBear

Moderator
Donor
Monthly Donor
Once again, real-life is proving how it would take little to push America to either Rumsfeldia or the CV.

Cindy Hyde-Smith, someone who is now a SENATOR, was able to get away with making a "joke" about a lynching, and then later "joke" about denying "liberal people" the right to vote. Let's say she was serious about "joking" about those things. That's even worse, because she apparently finds a horrible part about her history-voting rights suppression and racist persecution-to somehow be funny. She had also been a former Democratic politician.

And later, Governor Phil Bryant, when questioned about these remarks, made the most grotesque act of political diversion I have ever read about:



Is not just the fact these people can blithely say these things that is a problem. It is the fact they can say these things with little political consequences that is the problem. So it would not surprise me to see the rise of something like the CV and Rumsfeldia, because these two would be perfect CV types.
I warned you, in THIS THREAD, about dragging current politics into ANY Forum outside of Chat.

Clearly that did not make a damned bit of difference.

So, let's try another way to focus your attention.

Kicked for a week. Stop doing this. STOP.
 
Re-reading some of Drew's old posts, I found one that will certainly be listed in-universe as "Harsher In Hindsight"./

Television Commercial #1:

Foreground: a dark-skinned Desert Bandit sneaks-up on a group of white, blond-haired children playing, and watches them with an evil smile.

Narration: “The threat is real. If the communists get their hands on Africa’s uranium, then our children are doomed!”

The bandit pushes the button on an electronic device in his hand.

A mushroom cloud appears and obliterates the playground. The children’s bodies are shown as black silhouettes.


Suddenly an American soldier puts a bayonet through the bandit.

Narration: “But America won’t let that happen. Instead we will defeat the threat in Southern Africa and secure our homeland against those who would destroy our freedom.”

Cuts to President Rumsfeld reviewing Marines in dress uniform.

Narration: “President Rumsfeld fights evil and defends freedom.”

Voice of Rumsfeld: “Only by destroying the enemy in Africa can we really be free. Won’t you help me do that, for the sake of our freedom and our way of life?”

Narration: “Write your Congressman and Senator today and demand they support President Rumsfeld’s fight for freedom.”

I think future historians ITTL will talk about this commercial with bitter irony: that the threat of nuclear annihilation WAS real, but John Q. Public missed the real threat all along.
 
I have been reading this timeline, and it is really rather scary seeing a literal fascist regime appear in America, which, in our timeline, is one of the world's superpowers.

How did neoliberalism do? Is it still a credible ideology or has it gone the way of the dodo with the Rumsfeld/Coe regimes? I am of the opinion that when the Russian hegemony falls, we may well see another neoliberal period in the style of the 1980s in OTL.
 
I have been reading this timeline, and it is really rather scary seeing a literal fascist regime appear in America, which, in our timeline, is one of the world's superpowers.

How did neoliberalism do? Is it still a credible ideology or has it gone the way of the dodo with the Rumsfeld/Coe regimes? I am of the opinion that when the Russian hegemony falls, we may well see another neoliberal period in the style of the 1980s in OTL.
If it does happen, it won't be for another generation. And it may happen in Europe and Russia, but probably not in the American successor states.
 

manav95

Banned
If it does happen, it won't be for another generation. And it may happen in Europe and Russia, but probably not in the American successor states.

It's already happened; Russia has done MBA Communism and opened up it's economy like OTL China. So they are now heading towards global economic dominance given the implosion of the US.
 
It's already happened; Russia has done MBA Communism and opened up it's economy like OTL China. So they are now heading towards global economic dominance given the implosion of the US.

Damn. What does it say about the world that a corrupt, authoritarian, communist regime is the dominant economic and military power in the world, because the other dominant power destroyed everything good about itself. How does your outlook on life change when such things became apparent.
 
It's already happened; Russia has done MBA Communism and opened up it's economy like OTL China. So they are now heading towards global economic dominance given the implosion of the US.
What I mean is that Ryzhkov will kick the proverbial bucket and his replacement will, even if Ryzhkov gets his wet dream where Eurasia from Londonderry to Vladivostok is under the Russian yoke and incorporated in ATL's *Warsaw Pact, when the next recession hits, the *Tories, *UPM, and whatever opposition parties exist in *Soviet Russia will all be clamouring for true neoliberalism, not like Rumsfeldia/CV which was, in fact, Fascism disguised as neoliberalism.

This ATL is actually quite interesting in that Socialism and neoliberalism have swapped places. In this ATL, neoliberalism has caused millions of deaths across the world, whereas Socialism has pulled people out of poverty and rejuvenated
 
What I mean is that Ryzhkov will kick the proverbial bucket and his replacement will, even if Ryzhkov gets his wet dream where Eurasia from Londonderry to Vladivostok is under the Russian yoke and incorporated in ATL's *Warsaw Pact, when the next recession hits, the *Tories, *UPM, and whatever opposition parties exist in *Soviet Russia will all be clamouring for true neoliberalism, not like Rumsfeldia/CV which was, in fact, Fascism disguised as neoliberalism.

This ATL is actually quite interesting in that Socialism and neoliberalism have swapped places. In this ATL, neoliberalism has caused millions of deaths across the world, whereas Socialism has pulled people out of poverty and rejuvenated

Uh...

I think this world has seen the worst of both the far-left and right.

Far-left China devolved into a chaotic, mass-murdering, narco-state whose leadership was willing to drop nukes.

America, going far-right, devolved into the same thing.
 

mspence

Banned
If America is able to rebuild, it will probably be as a Commonwealth.

Anything pop culture related is happening in Europe, Japan, Australia, Mexico, and to a smaller degree MBA-era Russia.

Just for arguments' sake, here's my version of how a Fear & Loathing/Rumsfeldia presidency TL might have gone under different circumstances:

Richard M. Nixon 1969-1974; Impeached
Philip Habib, Deputy Secretary of State, Acting President, 1974-77
George Wallace 1977-1981
George H.W. Bush 1981-1989
Donald Rumsfeld 1989-1991; Removed from office
Pat Robertson, "Acting President," 1991-1992
Douglas Coe, 1992-?
Interregnum Period, 1992-2001
Gen. Colin Powell, de facto acting President during the post-Coe era
American reunification era, formation of American Commonwealth, 2001-2006
Commonwealth Presidents:
John McCain, Unity Party, 2001-2005
Jerry Brown, Progressive Coalition, 2005-2013
Jon Huntsman, Independent Coalition, 2013-2017
Gary Johnson, Libertarian Coalition, 2017-current
 
I have an idea for the name of the Loyalist’s (New England) Civil War Government, The Council for the Defense of the Republic or CONDOR.
 
When eventually the CSA is cornered, Where you think that the rest of the atomic arsenal is going to be launched? I don't think these people will lose without destroying something of their enemies. I have two options: one is New England where the exiled goverment is and the other is on their own territory to destroy the enemies


A little headcanon of mine: the name of Washington was changed to New Jerusalem
 
It's actually Christopolis
I change my headcanon: New Jerusalem would be the name.that they are going to give to New York if they defeat the evil Satanists from New England

I found on the Rummyhorror update that Washington is actually called "Christ City"
 
Last edited:
When eventually the CSA is cornered, Where you think that the rest of the atomic arsenal is going to be launched?
The CSA only has access to smaller yield, shorter range nuclear weapons, deployed via cruise missiles, smaller aircraft (like the B61) and artillery.
ICBMs, strategic bombers and ballistic missile subs are out of their reach. Although some of the weapons at their disposal are still devastating (up to 400 kilotonnes).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top