Good point's man though Egypt surprisingly enough might have a peaceful solution if a agreement was ever reached, that might with some soviet help.Venezuela is definitely Soviet aligned, but is suffering from political chaos as the various powers within the leftist junta jockey against each other. The situation with LGBT rights would probably have proceeded as it did in the 1980s, generally regarded as a mental illness, however there would be more of a push from within the party to regularize their situation. I find it difficult to believe it would be hard for Romanov and his generation to reconcile this, despite the fact he is an atheist. However, East Germany would probably have a fairly progressive policy, but it would be hard to say if it unofficial or official, because the HIV connotations that were more emphasized in the 1990s.
Pretty much lmao
There would definitely be remnants of CIA programs, that via their pejorative originally given manage to encourage 'anti soviet' political activity in Egypt, and this would probably be focused on the muslim brotherhood. However, without a cooperative President, and the UK's wavering commitment, I couldn't see any major active western support. However, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and etc would definitely be supporting the Islamists, as would the radical terrorist groups that are growing completely unhindered in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
The Egyptian Army is a major factor however, the vast majority of their officers would rather fight a civil war before allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to take control. I would think they may try to appeal to the Soviet Union for assistance.
The muslim brotherhood and Egyptian army share a long, complex, love and hare relationship given they were some of the strongest organizations in Egypt and helped shape society, if it were not the fact that some events and the upper officers not wanting to share power and different beliefs in government and foreign policy they would get along quite well given the Muslim brotherhood still has vast sway on Egypt.
Rather than regard of them as fanatics, one of the main splits can be compared to Trotsky and Stalin. The Muslim brotherhood for example wish to put thier upiton vision of socity into practice and expand Egypt by adding Libya, Sudan ect as part of a process of building one nation for Muslims all over the world, continue the struggle with Israel, support Muslims all over the world and combat the racism (sectarian attitude towards different faiths is another thing), wealth equality, ect of Egyptian society. Then got fanatic's like ayman al-zawahiri and that cia double agent Ali Abdul Saoud Mohamed rather than the ones who believe they should be active in democracy and build support and powerbase for their dream through running services like health clinics, education, youth services ect to start building their society.
The Egyptian army views itself and is the foundation of the modern Egyptian state. It believes that it is needed to protect and guide the state and must make pragmatic hard choices in order to enrich and strengthen itself to prevent Egypt from being colonized again. Obviously they like the power and wealth (well upper officers) but their are plenty of Salafists in the army and many hold some sympathy for the Muslim brotherhood. It's why Egypt had so many fighters go to Afghanistan and sold the US soviet weapons'.
One of the major issues that really makes both Islamists and Egyptian nationalists sick to their stomach though is the peace deal with Israel, more explicitly what that deal entails with the Sinai that is almost never talked about instead of Palestine.
Here what it means from article a few years ago about the Sinai insurgency that help explains why the Insurgency will likely never be defeated and Islamists always see Israel as controlling the Egyptian state.
The Sinai Insurgency, Part 4: The Egyptian Military In Crisis - International Review
The Egyptian military, central to Egyptian society and legacy, finds itself mired in crisis in a seemingly endless Sinai insurgency.
international-review.org
On 26 March 1979, the groundbreaking Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty was signed, returning the Sinai to Egypt.25. While the treaty more broadly improved Egyptian-Israeli relations, there are several key components that relate heavily to the current security situation in the Sinai.26. Since the treaty was signed the only major permanent military presence in the Sinai has been the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO). The MFO is an operation force made up around 1,000 personnel from a dozen countries with the largest presence being held by Fiji, United States, Colombia, and the United Kingdom.27. Other than the MFO, Egypt can maintain an Infantry Division in Zone A along the West Coast along with four border security battalions in that same Zone A.28. Since the rise in violence, Israel has granted several temporary measures to the Egyptian armed forces, allowing them to deploy additional forces into the peninsula to combat militants but often restricting them to very specific zones of operation.
Granted the author still fails to find it strange that there are multiple foreign countries dictating the Egyptian government where and how many troops to deploy in their own nation and would make anyone question a nation's sovereignty or how the Sinai can ever be developed if Egyptian army which controls the economy and public services can't be deployed...well if Egypt ever got Soviet support that would enable them to change the situation by reasserting sovereignty would likely bring all sections of together for a while, it does not hurt of course pan Arabism does have a have presence of political Islam attached to it and would deprive the CIA of a large source cannon fodder, sorry I mean freedom fighters.
Last edited: