To the OP:
It has been my experience that there is a considerable wealth of knowledge available on this boards on many subjects. When presenting a Time Line, one has basically three options. One can make use of that knowledge to improve the time line, and learn from the experts kicking around. Sometimes this will involve backtracking a fair amount, and it is generally a good idea not to try and cover too much ground in any one post for that very reason. Extreme examples of this can be seen in Keynes' Cruisers and The Death of Lt Arthur Windsor, RN, where individual updates are generally very short. It can be a lot of work, but it is also very rewarding when you feel you've got a timeline that falls into the category: "This could have happened."
A second option is to ignore comments. That's simple, but it doesn't involve learning, and it is probable that people won't regard it as a serious time line.
And the third option would be to embrace the implausibilities, and submit to the ASB forum, where you can basically ascribe such glitches to these creatures. I understand that it is considered the custom to allow the ASBs one change, and then let things roll logically from there, but that is, I understand, a matter of taste.
I would suggest that if you come across a forum filled with PhD level historians (even if many haven't actually got the PhD, just the necessary knowledge levels), it is wiser to try and soak up as much of the expertise as you can rather than complaining about the high levels of expertise.
Or not, as the case may be.