Oy vey. I was even about to come back and try and temper my words, but you keep taking the DBWI out far beyond anything I intended.
If you've been paying attention to the "Japanese Victory(?)" thread, Calbear has been constantly referencing just how much in dire straights Japan's population was post-WW2 OTL, and just how much worse it could have gotten had the war continued. This DBWI was intended to try and explore what would have happened HAD that happened: had a surrender not been negotiated, had weather forced off an American invasion to the next year while the blockade remained (and, I might point out, the 60 year blockade wasn't my idea), Japan WOULD have suffered a population loss much, much worse than it did, (though calling it such a small fraction was a complete mistake on my part). And it would have been something some would call genocide, while people in the US would most likely have rejected such an accusation. Japan suffering worse is as much a legitimate DBWI as America suffering MAD.
The UN resolution about territorial was intended to be a propoganda piece by some ideological faction or another. My character was against that label; I have no control about what others say. A more or less minor island here or there? Maybe even the small island the US considered annexing OTL? That would be the basis of a claim that could be expanded, had someone wanted to make the effort. Even a single character saying "no, that's bullshit" like you did OOC would have been appropriate. That's what a DBWI is half about: disagreement. Only in this case, it hardly would have been a disagreement because you would have been agreeing with my character in saying that the UN resolution was a load of BS.
The Armenian Genocide was an in-character universe attitude. Believe it or not, there
are people who reject accusations that the the Armenian Genocide was a deliberate policy to eradicate each and every Armenian. Abdul could read you a list.
I thought that it was rather obvious that TTL US would adopt a more sympathetic view of the Turks position if they (the US) were in a similar position of being accussed of something that those in the US felt was an unfair accusation.
As for why this thread is a "retry," it's because some people don't understand how to roleplay into and take part in a DBWI. Your entire position would have been entirely legitimate as an in-character explanation as to why the UN resolution was bad.