Republic of Egypt

Is this a tl or what?
Btw how the hell did you get LGBT stuff passed in a majority muslim country especially one that holds mecca and medina? The islamists and consveratives would appose this.

Also why is Egypt so pro isreal but not supportive of palestine?

Also Jerusalem who controls it?
 
Being a friend of the fellow called VoughtVindicator over on DeviantArt, I request you do not steal his artwork. Likewise you ought not to steal the artwork of everyone else you've done so from.

That said, this is a *very* Western Egypt.
 
Early modernization would result to lower population in the long run, higher population in the 19th century though or any nearer the Pod of development. Development usually leads to boom then slowing of population growth then stagnation, then population contraction. The later the development, the higher the population the lower the GDP per capita.

Also you need to check land fertility which Egypt cannot compete with high land fertility of the Mississippi or the Ukraine for the viability of the size of the population. Otherwise ATL Egypt will be prone to importation, which is very vulnerable for revolts/protests/depopulation during wars/blockades.

An ATL Egypt with the Area you stated, earlier development would be 100M population with per capita $40k usd, aging population, high HDI, zero to negative population growth by ATL 2018. Which is roughly where Germany and Japan are OTL 2018.

Your population and per capita stated, Achieving near OTL US population and US per capita requires massive amounts of resources and human development, while adding population. US achieved this through the resources available in OTL CONUS, immigration friendly nature of US, western land expansion, accompanied by US human development and European migration/investment. And US got a head start on population by 1820s with 9M vs Egypt 4M.

From the baseline 4M vs 9M and tie the population growth, human and technological development, industrialization with OTL USA, ATL Egypt could potentially at best get 150M with $60k per capita by ATL 2018. in ATL 1914, Egypt could have 45M population, 65M 1939, 75M 1950, same as OTL US per capita in those years. That is the maximum potential of ATL Egypt.

Your numbers as posting the combination of population, GDP, per capita, gdp growth, population growth are impossible to prove achievable.
 
Early modernization would result to lower population in the long run, higher population in the 19th century though or any nearer the Pod of development. Development usually leads to boom then slowing of population growth then stagnation, then population contraction. The later the development, the higher the population the lower the GDP per capita.

Also you need to check land fertility which Egypt cannot compete with high land fertility of the Mississippi or the Ukraine for the viability of the size of the population. Otherwise ATL Egypt will be prone to importation, which is very vulnerable for revolts/protests/depopulation during wars/blockades.

An ATL Egypt with the Area you stated, earlier development would be 100M population with per capita $40k usd, aging population, high HDI, zero to negative population growth by ATL 2018. Which is roughly where Germany and Japan are OTL 2018.

Your population and per capita stated, Achieving near OTL US population and US per capita requires massive amounts of resources and human development, while adding population. US achieved this through the resources available in OTL CONUS, immigration friendly nature of US, western land expansion, accompanied by US human development and European migration/investment. And US got a head start on population by 1820s with 9M vs Egypt 4M.

From the baseline 4M vs 9M and tie the population growth, human and technological development, industrialization with OTL USA, ATL Egypt could potentially at best get 150M with $60k per capita by ATL 2018. in ATL 1914, Egypt could have 45M population, 65M 1939, 75M 1950, same as OTL US per capita in those years. That is the maximum potential of ATL Egypt.

Your numbers as posting the combination of population, GDP, per capita, gdp growth, population growth are impossible to prove achievable.

Egypt also has OTL Sudan, South Sudan, and Uganda which might add to the population.
 
I hate to be this guy, but this is soooo ASB that its nit even funny, I got tired mid way of reading how amazing everything in Egypt is now.
And the butterfly massacers???? Why??
A president Trump with a POD in the mid 19th century?
And Israel is not making water in the desert, it use the water more efficently. So no magic rivers in the Sahara all of a sudden
Sorry, but some body had to say it...
 
Egypt also has OTL Sudan, South Sudan, and Uganda which might add to the population.

OTL US in 1820 was not the whole USA you know today, no Texas, California, Alaska or western USA yet. Plus a less developed Central USA, less food sources.

The stats I gave are best case scenario for Egypt with a very very small chance of happening.

If you want a higher chance of population, make the economy smaller/Gdp per capita smaller than OTL to achieve 280M population.

If you want higher capita (achieve $60k per capita), you have to make population smaller than OTL. OTL today population Egypt, Uganda, South Sudan, Sudan is below 200M or near 200M. The reason for lower population is higher human development. Higher human development means people are less likely to procreate due to financial constraints(of having multiple children) or simply refuse to have a family as early as 18-21.

Production/producing stuff, making money is also relative to human development. If Human development is higher, the higher the efficiency of making money or production. But the higher your human development the lower the population growth.
 
OTL US in 1820 was not the whole USA you know today, no Texas, California, Alaska or western USA yet. Plus a less developed Central USA, less food sources.

The stats I gave are best case scenario for Egypt with a very very small chance of happening.

If you want a higher chance of population, make the economy smaller/Gdp per capita smaller than OTL to achieve 280M population.

If you want higher capita (achieve $60k per capita), you have to make population smaller than OTL. OTL today population Egypt, Uganda, South Sudan, Sudan is below 200M or near 200M. The reason for lower population is higher human development. Higher human development means people are less likely to procreate due to financial constraints(of having multiple children) or simply refuse to have a family as early as 18-21.

Production/producing stuff, making money is also relative to human development. If Human development is higher, the higher the efficiency of making money or production. But the higher your human development the lower the population growth.
well, Israel has a high population growth and a developed economy
 
well, Israel has a high population growth and a developed economy

What is Israel's population growth and what is the definition of high population growth?

Having 2.8% growth rate makes you top 10 population growth in the world. Not only that you want a GDP per capita of $60k. While that 2.8% pop growth rate is based on 280M population.

Israel revolves around 1.5-2.0% which brings you down top 50-80 population growth. And Israel has population of 8M to get that 1.5-2% and $40k per capita.

Try reviewing your data and projection first rather than putting too much bias at the expense of realism. Or better simply ask to transfer this to ASB forum .
 
Is it just me, or have we had a bit of a run on people proposing AH in which socially liberal western ideals triumph early or in some particularly unlikley part of the world (or both)?

Also, this is the first time my ‘what would this mean for Rommel’s Africa Campaign’ running joke would actually be appropriate.
 
Top