Remember, Remember, the Third of October...

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Consequences of the Loss of Bacon

Among the notable deaths in 1605 during the Conflagration was Francis Bacon, a notable in Elizabeth I's court. The works for which he is known, are thusly:

  • Mediationes sacrae
  • Essays
  • The Advancement of Learning

For a long time after his death, Bacon's works fell into ignominy, Charles' focussing his reign first on conquest and then on religion. It was this religious phase of his reign as well as Cromwell's policy of reconstruction that brought the first of these works back to the light. The ideas of the Meditationes Sacrae caught on like wildfire especially in the aspiring radical thinkers which had emerged in the Midlands since the days of the Communes. Its principles of thinking through actions, listening closely to the words of preachers lest they beguile you, and its doctrine of tolerance to atheists and education to heretics, annoyed many churchmen. However the new Britannic Church caught on to many of its ideals, particularly the involvement of the congregation in the reading of Scripture, and its proselytising message.

With the Meditationes Sacrae proving popular, his other works soon caught on too. His ideas set out to James I in the year of his death were particularly seized upon, as that year was still fresh in many men's minds. The fact that the two men would soon be dead so soon after its writing caused it to be a highly fashionable book to buy, and its expense made it a status symbol. Its principles of establishing some sort of scientific order by the state became rapidly popular, and while Cromwell was loathe to spend the state's money on an entirely new ministry the powerful Midlands Lobby in Parliament forced his hand. The Ministry of Science and Learning was established in 1640, and lead to universities being constructed in most of Britain's major cities. This proliferation of universities allowed Cromwell to boot out the university constitutencies which had remained despite the respective towns of Cambridge and Oxford having suffered in the extreme during the Triplicate Wars. The symbol of the Ministry was the Roman fasces adopted due to Bacon's quote comparing man's accumulated knowledge to a bundle of sticks bound together.

Alongside the establishment of new universities, the Imperial Society of Natural Philosophy was set up, for the purpose of studying science and the natural world, and was headed by the Minister for Science and Learning. In the rebuilding of the cities of England, libraries were constructed, and statues of great thinkers erected. Bacon's talk of apotheosis of the genius was considered heretical by some, and here the Britannic Church drew a line, but so long as the statues were of local men and in the vicinity of the libraries, then the Church was willing to halt its criticism.

The nascent witch-hunts which had emerged in the Fenlands were crushed, their judgements proved false. Superstition and violent religious acts were condemned as Papist, and many would be witch-hunters fled to the New World where they brought their version of religious intolerance with them.

Most importantly, the study of medicine was rigorously encouraged with the dissection of bodies legalised. Many people had come out of the war horribly injured and attempts to fix them with traditional or ad hoc cures had proven to be a poor substitute for the study of the human body which began now in the universities of Britain.

Gardens and parks were also built in the new cities of England, leading to many towns sprawling outwards to a greater extent than they may have done otherwise. On the other hand, much more of these cities were preserved in their natural state due to the construction of the parks and the encouragement of greenery.

The final work of Bacon were his Ten Essays. These encouraged the culture of frugality and worthwhile spending that Cromwell had already begun, and the new cities were built in a plain style that spoke of utility and functionality, their only commitment to decoration being plantlife. The frugality of British life from the increased taxation under Cromwell was elevated by the words of Bacon, who posthumously legitimised the Lord High Commissioner's policies. Just as healthy and careful living was encouraged so healthy and careful learning on the part of individuals was encouraged.

Bacon also seemed to be on the side of the Emperor. Charles was greatly intrigued by the writings of a man who was not only close to his father, but had died at his side. In particular, his idea that the monarch should be above political squabbling, and that his word should be the deciding blow in any war amongst political factions clung to Charles' mind and his strong belief in his divine right to rule.

Bacon undoubtedly dramatically changed Britain even if he didn't know it. However, his work was primarily applied in the home, and by politicians, his ideals of science and religion proving less hardy, though they would be taken up by others in due time. On the other hand, the changes enacted in Britain, the reforms to the Church, and the building of the 'garden-cities' and their accompanying libraries, universities and reverence for learning, made Britain a very attractive destination to scholars, scientists, philosophers, artists and simple immigrants from all over Europe. York in particular benefitted enormously, and grew stupendously, the new House of Parliament built in the new simplistic style. A visitor from the United Provinces described the building, with its hanging plants and its large accompanying park as a 'new Garden of Babylon, well-befitting the reign of the new Emperor'.
 
Last edited:
The British colonies in the New World were growing rapidly, and a home grown aristocracy was emerging as exiles and transportees of old English houses came across. Collectively, the colonies became referred to as New Britain, but it is the New English colonies which will be our focus.

By late 1630s and early 1640s, while the colonies still had only a small population, there was a veritable multiplicity of them, catering for a wide range of religious beliefs. From the Puritan colony of Massachusetts Bay, to the Catholics of Christinia, every theology which disagreed with the new religious settlement in England had their own home. But even here, intolerance bred resentment and some tried to find somewhere they would be welcome. Plymouth was quite tolerant, home to a mixed bed of Britannicans and Dissenters and they moderated their treatment of blasphemers and so on. But in Maine, with their proximity both to the Calvinist settlements of Nova Scotia and Massachusetts, intolerance bred with the exception of the area of New Hampshire which was solidly settled with a mix of Welshmen (well known for their Dissenter beliefs and strong principles of religious toleration) and Midlanders (who had brought with them the radical ideals of the Communes and their descendants).

Conflict was regular with the natives and irregular with the French and Dutch. This bred a form of independent identity, but the need for arms from the motherland alongside Cromwell's ambitions to make the colonies profitable meaned that settlement was strictly regulated in time, and certain areas designated for colonial baronetage, penal settlement or something else. Taxes were implemented at an early stage, but what with migration to the colonies coming from religious dissenters, transported criminals and indentured servants, it seemed unlikely that this imposition would drastically curtail the success of the colonial adventure.

Conflict with the natives was expensive and prevented effective colonisation, something that Cromwell couldn't tolerate. Imitating the Spanish, as well as the various governors in the colonies, he appointed a Viceroy to administrate the New British colonies on the behalf of the Imperial Crown. This Viceroy would report back to the Minister for the Colonies represented the British colonies to the Imperial Crown. This first Viceroy was a Cromwellian appointee, Roger Williams, a broad-minded churchman with whom Cromwell was sympathetic, if not the Emperor. Williams could not alter the royal charters of the colonies, many of which officially stipulated their religious leaning. But he did force the colonies to recognise the Sachems of the law abiding tribes of New England. Williams wanted to make the Sachems on a footing with the Baronets that Cromwell had sold, and in time to make them part of the fabric of New English society.

In that respect he failed, with the Narragansett War breaking out in the 1640s. Christiana and Plymouth combined their forces at the Viceroy's behest, as well as taking in the warriors of various tribes. The Narragansett were broken, in a typically Cromwellian show of force that Williams himself found distasteful. Nevertheless, the combination of Williams' velvet glove and Cromwell's iron fist won over the other tribes, and with time many native villages integrated into their respective colonies and their Sachems became notable aristocrats.

There were always negatives. The Natives would never match the numbers of the colonists. So Williams set the Proclamation Lines. Colonisation beyond a certain line was illegal and the settlers would not be liable to protection by the state. The only people who could cross the Line were those carrying an Imperial warrant to do so. The Viceroy alone decided when a line was to be lifted, and colonisation permitted in a new region. This was unpopular but meant that frontier settlers were reliant on the natives for survival. Traders were reliant on the Viceroy and the wider British government for support. Overtime, the frontier settlers either moved back behind the Line or integrated into native society at a time when the natives were integrating. This boosted numbers of British friendly natives.
 
Laying some seeds for some rather cool events

The Moriscos of Spain when expulsed under Phillip, mostly fled to Morrocco and then to the more anarchic Barbary Coast. They came here because in Morocco, they received abuse and persecution for the same reasons they had in Spain. This time, their Christian faith and European acculturation made them alien, and seen as a harbinger of Spain wanting to expand its holdings in Morocco. Fleeing into the Barbary Coast, they were more accepted though in many areas restricted to certain cities, or even certain areas of cities. Here, as the Ottomans concentrated their resources on Arabia and Europe, the writ of Turkish law was not so strictly followed. Many Moriscos found a life for themselves as money lenders, offering securities to the pirate lords and corsairs who plied their trade in the Mediterranean. Others found more legitimate work, using links that remained with friends in Spain to build a healthy trade route that connected the Turkish empire to Morocco and Spain via the various coastal cities of the Barbary coast.

As the corsairs grew more successful over the course of the Twenty Five Years War, and the various troubles afterwards and the more legitimate trade route profitted from the lack of Mediterranean maritime trade, slaves grew ever more important to the economy. And so the corsairs began plying their trade in old hunting spots, kidnapping whole villages and selling them in slave markets where they would find lives of pulling oars, mining salt or as house servants. This contributed further to the wealth of the Barbary cities and soon they were training slaves to sell to the wealthy of the Ottomans, or even the Italians and the Safavids. And this forced them to find ever greater numbers of slaves. So laying the seeds for their doom...


Elsewhere, the Ottomans were having some problems. They had built a great buffer state against the Poles, but this land was full of Cossacks who saw no reason to listen to the Ottoman Sultan. They saw no help forthcoming from Poland or Muscovy, one too weak to intervene, the other too concerned with its other ambitions to bother. And while they languished alone, the Turks had done what the Poles had done. They had used the Jewish moneylenders and businessmen of the region to collect taxes and administer this puppet emirate. A growing resentment amongst the peasantry and the Cossacks towards these rich men and their Turkish benefactors grew. This was a false resentment, as most Jews lived in moderate conditions and their movement was strictly limited, with any abuse attributable to the powerful Muslim rulers. But they soon shifted the blame for their poor decisions onto the Jews, and the Cossacks blamed the wealth of the rulers and the poverty of the majority on the avarice and cruelty of the Jews. They claimed that the Ottomans had sold the people into slavery to the Jews. Poland was increasingly anti-Semitic under its Wurtemburg king, and as the Cossacks grew braver and more certain of the right they had to rebel and punish those who they believed had done wrong, a distinctly unpleasant circumstance was building...
 
Last edited:

forget

Banned
Thanks for the really cool updates Mumby.
What has not been made clear is Cromwell policy of colonisation in the new world settling land in the New World expanding faster than in OLT?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the really cool updates Mumby.
What has not been made clear is Cromwell policy of colonisation in the new world settling land in the New World expanding faster than in OLT?

I would say its about the same or even slightly slower. This is because while the penal colonies are more intense, there are more religious immigrants and the sale of colonial baronets is moderately successful the imposition of standard British taxes has rather taken OTL's economic immigrants out of the equation.
 

forget

Banned
Higher taxes means less money is being brought into the coffers as less people want to live in an under developed land were there is not enough to support the taxes in the first place.
 
Higher taxes means less money is being brought into the coffers as less people want to live in an under developed land were there is not enough to support the taxes in the first place.

There are more people being forced to go to the colonies than OTL, albeit less going of their own free will.

However, after a little reading, I see your point, and I have decided to take a new tack.

One of Cromwell's revenue raising master strokes was to divide the colonies into several tiers of government and taxation. The most developed regions and towns of the colonies would be divided into 'shires' and 'burghs' and send full taxes back to Britain. They would however receive full protection from the Crown, and a priority level of representation. This also allowed Cromwell to establish bicameral legislatures in the colonies, the lower house made up of the representatives of the whole voting population, the upper house representing only the shires and burghs. Below this top tier were the 'provinces' who had a lower tax burden, but less representation. The lowest tier were the 'marches' who paid the least taxes but were at the most risk. Provision of certain services by the state were more generous to these lower tiers, the assumption being that the higher tiers were more capable of looking after themselves. The imposition of the Viceroy streamlined this whole system nicely.
 

forget

Banned
Hi Mumby
Thanks for taking the little points I have been putting down.
I have examined your latest comments closely and I am very glad you have defined Cromwells colonial economic management into a 7 tier system of tax imposition.
I get quite excited about my economic theories and your right Cromwells colonial management is organised and quite revolutionary way of encouraging settlers into new areas.
While encouraging paying of taxes with representation in the English parliament.
The whole economic theory is very clever if not genius.
I love it.:D
I really have to start studying up on my Cromwellian history now.
 
Last edited:
Hi Mumby
Thanks for taking the little points I have been putting down.
I have examined your latest comments closely and I am very glad you have defined Cromwells colonial economic management into a 7 tier system of tax imposition.
I get quite excited about my economic theories and your right Cromwells colonial management is organised and quite revolutionary way of encouraging settlers into new areas.
While encouraging paying of taxes with representation in the English parliament.
The whole economic theory is very clever if not genius.
I love it.:D
I really have to start studying up on my Cromwellian history now.

When I say representation, I don't mean actually in Parliament. The Minister for the Colonies has a priority to make the greivances of those areas known.
 
Galileo and the birth of the Scientific Method in Italy

Galileo's theory of heliocentrism shook the idea of immutable Scripture to its core. The concepts that he was proposing were heretical in the eyes of the Church. Fortunately, he had his defenders. Pope Urban VIII was an admirer of Galileo, and he had other supporters like the Archbishop of Siena. While both men were geocentrics, they saw no reason why Galilei's theories should be treated as heresy. Galileo was in the process of writing a book on the subject containing the Pope's own views on the subject, when his house was destroyed in a tragic fire, losing his valuable manuscripts.

The great Italian scientist fell into a deep depression, and Urban and his allies came to sympathise more deeply with the aging man. In 1636, the Twenty Five Years War came to an end, and France began making changes to the structure of the Catholic Church. During the intervening time period, Galilei had written a shorter text detailing both sides of the argument, as well as the Pope's own opinions. He had also been careful to cultivate allies in the Roman clergy, as well as amongst the other scientists of Italy. The publication of the book was dynamite.

At a time when the Catholic Church had never looked so vulnerable, with the Protestant powers in the ascendacy, the French making intimations towards ecclesiastical independence, and the demolition of the Holy Roman Empire, an outright rejection of Galilei's ideas when they were increasingly popular amongst the Italian intelligentsia and parts of the Church itself could cause critical damage to the Church's position.

Galilei was summoned by the Roman Inquisition to convince the Pope of not only the scientific grounding of his arguments but also to back them up with Scripture. Galilei did this quite skillfully. Urban was not entirely convinced but with talk in the streets of angry intellectuals who wouldn't take kindly to their hero being declared a heretic, Urban VIII reluctantly declared that the heliocentric Copernican model of the solar system was the correct and Catholic one, backed up by science and scripture. The intellectuals of Italy came out robustly in support of the Papal decision, and soon Galileo was heading a Papal Commission of Natural Philosophy. While he only sat in this position for a year before retiring, he established Rome as a centre of scientific research, a new model of experimentation and observation being adopted that would take many years to spread beyond Italy and Catholic Europe.
 
Well, that's a rather nice inversion of OTL.

Little mini POD there. The house fire destroyed his OTL book that while it described both heliocentrism and geocentrism, and included the opinions of his geocentric Papal benefactor, it also made geocentrism and the Pope look stupid. The destruction of this manuscript means that Galileo never alienates the Pope, and is able to informally spread his ideas before making them public, by which point they are moderately broadly accepted anyway.
 
Richelieu versus Medici

What with a smooth transition from Henry IV to Louis XIII, Richelieu and Medici never formed a Regency, and so contested for power over the King while he tried to rule. The King's mother was deep in the pockets of certain allies at court, mostly concerned with gathering honours and wealth to their personage. Because of this, Louis distinctly favoured Richelieu, though he wavered in this alliance whenever the Cardinal tried to broach a closer relationship with Rome. Louis was determined to secure control of the Catholic Church in France, and reassured Richelieu that though the clergy were now to be more closely regulated by the state, they would also be more involved in the state.

This restructuring of the realm was unpopular in certain noble circles. Louis and Richelieu were busily cutting down noble privileges, shortening the power of parlements, and centralising power and influence to the throne. However Louis' building of an absolute monarchy was still fresh and weak, and the nobles were determined to halt Louis' planned tax reforms in their tracks.

Marie de Medici was determined to maintain a political stranglehold on her son, in order to amass wealth to herself and her allies. She formed a conspiracy with many high ranking nobles to seize power over the King, execute or exile Richelieu and reverse many of the King's policies.

This culminated in 1639, when the King's Mother demanded that Louis dismiss Richelieu from his service. This cam mere days after a great falling out between Louis and the Cardinal, over weakening the power of the Pope to excommunicate royal officials. The King made no clear decision that day which caused Medici and her allies to believe that that Louis had sided with them.

In fact, Louis was simply busy reassuring Richelieu and gathering his guard to arrest the conspirators who had gathered in Paris to celebrate the fall of the Cardinal. Louis and his men marched in and seized the King's mother and her allies, and accused them of treason and corruption. They were exiled or imprisoned, and Louis affirmed Richelieu in his position as his chief minister.

Louis' revenge was absolute. The estates of those who had conspired against him were seized and variously granted to either himself, political allies or to the Church. He used this final gift to assuage Richelieu, and from this point on, the Gallican Catholic Church received the full support of the Cardinal. A new part of Louis' political vision from now on was to turn the Church in France into an organ of bureaucracy centred on Paris, to replace the power of the parlements. This also fed into his vision of a godly France, with churches and monasteries supported by villages of peasants, with nobles having a responsibility of care.

Of course, just because he had removed some rebels didn't mean that he now had absolute power to reform France, and that the nobles had now come round to his way of thinking. Louis still faced considerable opposition to his wish to reform taxation, and his vision would go uncompleted until after his death.
 
While piracy reached a new height in the Mediterranean, those powers with most to lose had lost interest. Spain was too focussed on her internal problems and reforms to bother, and Louis XIII was also focussed on reforming France's archaic political and religious settlement. However, traders now sailed with large compliments of guns, and ports all around the Mediterranean now employed large cannon to ward off corsair attack.

The demand for slaves, especially European ones was high in the booming cities of the coast. The success of the pirates had deterred the maritime trade of the Mediterranean from growing again, so the land based trade route across North Africa had grown extremely important, as had the land based route across Spain, France and the Italies.

This golden age of corsair piracy, was to be rapidly curtailed by one of history's bizarre events that suddenly get out of hand. Slave raiders had operated as far away as Iceland for a long time, and raids had even taken place in Western England and Ireland from time to time, whole villages disappearing over night. In 1639, a particularly ambitious pirate lord, a man whose real name has been lost to history but is remembered as the Black Knife or Sakkim Aswat. He had been brought up on stories of the power of pirate lords in previous centuries, on crusading individuals who had forged empires around themselves. He had also heard of the fantastic worth of white slaves from Ireland, and of the weakness of the isles after the Triplicate Wars. He believed that if he could conquer land in Ireland, he could a build a slave trading and piratical empire on which he could die fat and happy.

With a not very small fleet, he landed in southern Ireland, and waged war on the local lords. This area was weakly united under Elizabeth's rule, resentful of the rise of Ulster as the most powerful part of Ireland. But nevertheless, no matter how much they resented Elizabeth and the Earls of Tyrone, that didn't mean they welcomed a Muslim pirate lord with designs on enslaving most of the peasantry.

Nevertheless, Sakkim was moderately successful, raiding the coast and torching settlements. He seized a poorly defended keep and declared himself Emir of the Isles. However, his army was poor in the field and the emirate was soon crushed in a matter of weeks. The eyes of Ireland were suddenly drawn east to the Barbary Coast, to the great golden cities, to the hordes of valuable slaves, to revenge.

Elizabeth's husband had been an adventurer in his youth and had briefly visited one of the cities of the Barbary Coast. He now badgered his wife to use Ireland's navy to build their empire there, in North Africa, not on the swampy Outer Banks of Virginia. Elizabeth soon caved in, the prospect of loot and a powerful empire to match that of Britain's proving attractive.

Sakkim's invasion was used a casus belli to attack the Barbary Coast. The Irish fleet received some support from the Spanish, who believed that if Ireland could seize some land in North Africa then they might get a return on the investment they made in the invasion of southern England.

Shane O'Neill directed the war, one which was hard fought at sea, but soon went in the favour of the Irish. Particularly as O'Neill found willing allies in the form of the Catholic Moriscos. While they had become wealthy on the trade routes and off the slave trade, they had severely curtailed rights and liberty of movement. O'Neill promised those with the most influence, titles and rights, maybe even dynastic marriages to make them the most powerful men in the new Irish kingdoms of the Barbary Coast.

By the time that Shane O'Neill had conquered Tunis, the Ottomans had taken Tripolitania and expelled the Moriscos, and defeated the Irish at a key battle. However, the Ottomans were not interested in reclaiming Tunis and Algiers preferring to concentrate on their European and Arabian territories. While removing the Bey of Tripoli, they recognised the Irish as overlords of Tunis and Algiers.

From this point onwards, Ireland would be a major player in North African politics. A couple of cities were ceded to the Spanish as payment for their help in the naval campaign and for their help in the Triplicate Wars. Viceroys were appointed from the Moriscos to rule over the two kingdoms over which Elizabeth now ruled. The area was soon attracting Irish settlement, and via trade links with the Morrocans, they were trading with the slavers of the interior to sell to the Ottomans and the Spanish and even sending them west to the tiny toe hold of Virginia. Worryingly for France, the Spanish, Austrians and Irish now jointly dominated the Eastern Mediterranean, and all three were Hapsburgs. The seeds of the Irish Empire had been sown...
 
While Catholicism was by this point concentrated in France and the Hapsburg Empires along with Poland, Lithuania and other areas, the Protestant Alliance that had won the war had secured a position of dominance in Northern Europe, and Islam had secured southeastern Europe as their own. But while Catholicism (with the exception of the growth of the Gallican Church) remained united, as did Ottoman Islam, Protestantism was far more fractious. Because of this, enmities and rivalries soon emerged between the various Protestant states. Particularly Denmark and Sweden. The Danes under Christian IV had never forgiven Gustavus Adolphus for his short victorious war in which he had reforged Sweden into the most powerful Protestant state in Europe. The Dutch fell out with the Swedes as well, as the Swedes could carry on their own transatlantic, North Sea-Baltic trade of their own. They also resented Swedish involvement in Westphalia which the Dutch saw as their playground to move in on.

Prussia and Saxony-Bohemia had falling outs too. Both nations had grown from electorates in the Holy Roman Empire into great kingdoms in their own right. Both kingdoms wanted to move east and take land from Poland. The two were also rapidly diverging culturally and religiously. Saxon Lutheranism was increasingly absorbing elements of Hussism just as Saxon German was picking up Czech loan words.

The British and Dutch also had a rivalry kicking off, as their most important settler colonies directly neighboured one another and frequently fought battles with one another without sanction from the mother land.

While Ireland, Spain and Austria drew together and formed the Hapsburg Family Compact, the Protestant kingdoms were moving apart and forming their own ambitions. The Poles, Lithuanians and French while Catholic had their own objectives. The Wurtemburg king of Poland had converted to Catholicism but hated the Hapsburgs and was leaning towards building a Polonic Church to mirror the Gallic Church of France. Lithuania, while staunchly Catholic was deliberately isolated, with closed borders and extreme state power.

Tensions were building across Europe, as cities recovered, trade was reinvigorated and interests in various domains across the globe intensified. The Spanish were securing their American domain, proxy wars were fought in North America, and the Irish had colonies in Virginia, North Africa and India...
 

katchen

Banned
Wow! Ireland a world power! No reason under certain circumstances that the Irish couldn't be any more than there's any reason that the English could not be. Until industrialization, when coal deposits begin to make a difference, Ireland has the same advantages and disadvantages that England has (island, population that needs to expand overseas, good land and weather for sheep, plenty of people who can be weavers, ect).
And the Irish have every likelihood that they will take the Mahgreb away from Dar al Islam and convert it's people to Catholicism while colonizing it with themselves, Italians and Germans and Croats from Austria. And African slaves from across the Sahara.

Sugar can be grown in the Mahgreb where there's water too. As can tobacco. Then again, sugar and tobacco can also be grown in India.

Yes indeed. Colonial resources are much more evenly divided TTL.
 
I really appreciate all the comments. :)

Importantly, Ireland has suffered a wave of migration from Britain as Catholics and other supporters of the Elizabethans came across. Thats boosted the population even more, and the need for colonies has grown massively.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top