I got class in like 5 minutes, i should have left already
Fair enough. I do these in between classes (my dorm is close to the buildings where I take classes). I'll probably have it up by tomorrow.
I got class in like 5 minutes, i should have left already
I haven't known of the Soviet participation in the shaping of the postwar government. I didn't read anything about that. But I do remember that Japan is collectivist authoritarian, semi-Stalinist style.... in some way but it seems to be more of the beginnings of the postwar republic and will not last. It's more like before 1970. I don't see any reason for Japan ITTL to be less well-off than OTL, just because it's politically authoritarian, while economically, it seems more aligned with the American system, but with more forceful coercion by the state, just like with the Soviet Union ITTL. It's very different.
While they're is obviously going to be an element of resistance to the New Order in Japan, we shouldn't overestimate it.
The revolutionary transformation is broadly successful because the old imperialists brought the country to ruin. The old way of doing things nearly destroyed the country. The war ends with a foreign power kicking the door in, and overthrowing a government that had been brutalizing its own citizens in a vain attempt to live out their pseudo-bushido fantasies. The Emperor voluntarily* abdicates, and lays the blame for the who the whole disaster befalling the Japanese people on the imperial system.
Post war Japan is not exactly a nice place. There is eventual liberalization, beginning in the mid 50s, but it is a long process. But the bottom line is that the new order takes hold because the country is being rebuilt, the people have decent housing, health care, full bellies, and what feels like meaningful participation in their self-government, first through the JCP party-state, and then through a multi-party system.
They'll get to take advantage of a well-integrated economic sphere in the Pacific rim during their economic recovery. A market they did not have access to historically, Mainland China and the Soviet Union, are open to them. They have a relative development advantage, especially in terms of human capital, over China. They're also the lynch pin for collective security in East Asia, the sentinel that keeps Chinese territorial waters safe from FBU encroachment.
I wonder, with the socialist dictatorship in Japan, what would the famous films of that era look like. Not just Godzilla and other kaiju films, but also the films of Akira Kurosawa. Would they endorse the messages of the socialist government?
Bit of a nitpick, but if he's based more on the Germanic rather than the Norse/Viking view, wouldn't he be called Donar?-Thor: Resembling the ancient Germanic version of the character (eschewing any Viking connections) Dr. Donald Blake finds a mysterious hammer, and after picking it up, transforms into the god Thor, who battles ancient Norse monsters, as well as aliens. Introduced much later, and became very popular in the neo-Pagan scene of the New Left.
I wouldn't think Samurai films would go out of vogue. You're right, the Bushido/Imperialist parts of the culture would probably be discouraged, but perhaps a more politically correct version of the samurai culture, where they serve as protectors of the noble peasants against the greedy warlords and emperors, who oppress them. The Seven Samurai could work very well in this context. Not historically accurate by any means, but serves the needs of the government in power quite nicely. A dramatization of the Boshin War would also look good. Perhaps modify it as the story of proletariat samurai fighting against an Imperialist regime that wants to destroy them, but later appropriates their culture for its own benefit. The government would want to do this, rewriting history, as ensure some sort of foothold with a more traditional portion of the population. Despite this, I think men like Kurosawa would probably stick to more modern locales, just to stay on the safe side of the government. Kaiju film would probably work as well ITTL as OTL, except the people collective have to destroy the monster at the end. A lot of the hidden criticism of atomic culture in Kaiju films would likely escape censors, because generally, Kaiju films are very fanciful and whimsical. I'd imagine Godzilla would be the creation of a Franco-British or Soviet bomb rather than an American one.I have a feeling that Samurai films might be out of vogue for a while, or at least any that portray them, and certainly anything to do with Bushido, in a remotely positive light. It may even butterfly away the impact of ninjas in Japanese and American/Western culture. There would probably also be a de-emphasising of Buddhist and Shinto themes and motifs, as I imagine the post-war government would try very hard to disestablish, if not outright eliminate the influence of those religions, given how integral they were to Imperial ideology. There's also the factor of whether and to what extent the Japanese state employs censorship.
Another thing to consider might be the impact of foreign cultures on Japanese culture in the post-war political climate. I imagine that British and French culture would have less of an impact, given that they're now on opposite sides of the Iron Curtain, whilst the surrounding Comintern countries are likely to have more of an impact. We may have a situation where Russian and Chinese culture, and maybe even Korean and Mexican culture, is as influential in post-war Japan as OTL American culture was. This is likely to have quite an impact on post-war Japanese cinema, as well as popular culture as a whole.
By extension, and at the risk of going off on a tangent, I imagine that French and British culture would be very different ITTL. Alan Moore was brought up earlier in this thread, and it was stated that he still writes Watchmen ITTL, but in my opinion I think it would be very different than OTL Watchmen.
Whilst American comics would be present, I don't see them being quite as hegemonic in the popular culture, and there would probably be a very strong efforts to build up the French and British comics industries. Another factor to consider is that IOTL the British and Franco-Belgian comic traditions are very distinct, with their own styles, traditions, and tropes. Given how closely France and Britain are tied politically, economically and culturally ITTL, we might end up seeing a synthesis between the two traditions.
I think it would make sense for Watchmen ITTL to be set in the FBU, rather than America, and it would be a deconstruction of ATL Franco-British comic tropes and conventions, rather than OTL American Superhero tropes and conventions. Either a lot of the things that would normally be played for dark comedy (read practically anything published by 2000AD if you don't know what I'm talking about) would be played strait, or alternatively it might be a dark comedy poking fun and drawing attention to the underlying racist and reactionary elements in the FBU comic industry (for some reason I think that the ATL Comedian would be a really dark parody of Tintin, with plenty of oblique references to Tintin in the Congo). Finally it would probably be a lot more partisan about the Cold War, given ATL Moore's Communist sympathies, clearly stating that the FBU is the problem, rather than the usual pox-on-both-their-houses approach OTL Moore took with regards to the US and Soviet Union.
Also:
Bit of a nitpick, but if he's based more on the Germanic rather than the Norse/Viking view, wouldn't he be called Donar?
I wouldn't think Samurai films would go out of vogue. You're right, the Bushido/Imperialist parts of the culture would probably be discouraged, but perhaps a more politically correct version of the samurai culture, where they serve as protectors of the noble peasants against the greedy warlords and emperors, who oppress them. The Seven Samurai could work very well in this context. Not historically accurate by any means, but serves the needs of the government in power quite nicely. A dramatization of the Boshin War would also look good. Perhaps modify it as the story of proletariat samurai fighting against an Imperialist regime that wants to destroy them, but later appropriates their culture for its own benefit. The government would want to do this, rewriting history, as ensure some sort of foothold with a more traditional portion of the population. Despite this, I think men like Kurosawa would probably stick to more modern locales, just to stay on the safe side of the government
I'm still kind of sceptical. It would be like Soviet cinema making a film about a band of noble Cossacks protecting the peasants and oppressed nations of Russia from the aristocracy. Yes I know there were red cossacks, but that isn't what they are generally remembered for. Alternatively, it would be like the USAR making a film set during the second civil war, where the heroes were all members of the KKK.
The only way I can see samurai getting any depictions that aren't just stock villains would be in Jidaigeki set in the appropriate time period, which are likely to be very critical of the era, or in works that deconstruct the Samurai myth and image. To a certain extent Kurosawa touched on this in Throne of Blood, an adaptation of Macbeth where he plays with the idea that the Samurai class system leads to an unbreakable cycle of violence and murder (there's a pretty decent review of it here).
What do you think?
The eagle is an animal strongly associated with imperialism and the raven is one strongly associated with the Native American tribes.Very good. I do wonder: Why the raven in particular?
He only suggested the Turkey to show that he hated the idea of the Bald Eagle being the national so much he'd rather have the most undignified bird in North America be the symbol.Why not a Turkey? I believe that was Ben Franklin's preference for national bird.
Very good. I do wonder: Why the raven in particular?