Reddit community discusses AH scenario

So if you weren't aware, /r/AskHistorians is one of the best communities on Reddit, mainly for their rules (and the moderators who actually enforce these rules). Anyways there's a private community for the flaired users in AskHistorians, and there's an interesting thread on the Europeans not showing up in the Americas (practically ASB, I know). To quote the main parts:

___________________________________

OP (/u/Reedstilt)

The what-if scenario of Europeans not colonizing the Americas pops up now and then on Reddit and it never tends to get a decent response. Originally I was going send a message to my fellow Americanists to see if we could put our collective heads together and come up with a potential scenario for what happens without Columbus, Cabot, Cartier, Cortes, etc. showing up on the scene. But since it's just as important to see what's going on Eurasia and Africa without Europeans colonizing the Americas, I figured I'd open this up to everyone.
I haven't gotten around to fully fleshing out the situation in the Eastern Woodlands, but here are some of the main points I'd like to focus on:
  • Basque fishermen may still show up in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. They don't have colonial intentions, but are instead focused on trading with the local Mi'kmaq and Beothuk communities. This beginnings the process of introducing technologies from Europe into the mix. Of course, if we can't have the Basque showing up with the Spanish Crown catching wind of new lands to add to their dominion, I suppose we can leave them in Europe too.
  • The Wenro Crisis erupts into war between the Haudenosaunee and the Chonnonton, continuing the expansion the Chonnonton began when they earlier invaded the Mascouten.
  • Since it doesn't suffer from introduced epidemics, Cofitachequi better able to weather the various droughts it experiences and continues the Mississippianization of East Coast.
  • Who does Talisi pay tribute to? Coosa and Atahachi will have to settle that question, one way or another. Without de Soto getting in the way, Tuskaloosa probably makes the first move since the micco of Coosa was relatively young and inexperienced. It'll be tough going for Coosa early in the war, but they might win in the end if they can mobilize quickly enough.

On thing I'd like to avoid is having an alternate timeline that's too predictable. It'll need a healthy dose of radicals, introducing new inventions and new ideologies that keeps the same centuries-old institutions plodding along forever. I still need to work on that on my end.

___________________________________


/u/CommodoreCoCo to OP

Let's see:
  • Huayna Capac still dies eventually, and Atahualpa defeats his brother for the Spanish throne. The empire is unstable, but the conflict plays a similar role as did the Roman civil wars.
  • Atahualpa asserts his control by strong assimilation policies. The forceful relocation of the troublesome Chachapoyas people has proven successful, so he adapts the same policy with conquered Chimu and Aymara populations in 1536. Enforced Quechua education wipes out Uru and Aymara- the last Aymara speaker dies in 1627. Chimu families are relocated to crucial resource extraction zones, such as Potosi's copper and tin mines. Aymara herders are dispersed across northern Peru.
  • Atahualpa's son Macno Inca Yupanqi continues the integration efforts and furthers it with his emphasis on infrastructure. As conquered cities adapt to the new rule, he constructs "public" schools in each. These instruct appropriate manners of ethnic pride, such as unique apparel, veneration of local apus, and token cultural dishes, but instill a firm sense of Inca identity- Inca religion, language, and social organization. These schools also scout for the best candidates for government positions. Skilled children and taken from their family to specialized schools under the guise of a "fee" for the education. This contributes to a diverse, bureaucratic, authoritative meritocracy
  • The Inca military heads further north in 1545. But the Chilean Mapuche to the Incas' south turn on the offensive around 1560. The Ecuadorian territories fall to Inca control, but are not assimilated as the others were. The Mapuche manage to regain some original territory, but they find it difficult to assault the Inca's planned infrastructure. A permanent garrison is placed on the southern border. Focus returns to the north in 1566, and modern Ecuador is completely in control by 1570. The Colombians prove difficult to conquer, but rarely provoke the far-ranging Inca military. In 1597, Musuq Capac orders the first successful coup in a Panamanian polity, establishing a central America puppet state.
  • By 1580, strong trade connections have been established with the prosperous Mayapan kingdom, the first true pan-Yucatan state. This generates fast advances in metallurgy and other technologies. The trade fuels a prosperous period of Pax Incae. The empire absorbs its Panama holdings in 1621.
  • In 1682, Mayapan falls to the rebranded Mexica empire, and the Inca lose crucial resources. In 1685, the Mapuche breach southern defenses and locals retreat to the Titicaca region. A neo-Aymara cult leader begins a revolutionary uprising based in the city of Tiwanaku. He calls the Inca subjects to recall their lost identities. A few key leaders in the Inca bureaucracy secretly back him, as they were one of many leaders forcefully taken from their homes during their teenage years. This sentiment takes hold with the Ecuadorians, who appropriate a Chimu identity and rally behind a "Restore Chan Chan" slogan. The Chimu capital had since become a breeding ground for mercenaries and illicit varieties of coca. The Inca navy is able to blockade these two factions and they are unable to successfully coordinate. Nevertheless, they manage to independently separate themselves from functional Inca rule.
  • The Inca military successfully reincorpoates the North in 1697. The neo-Aymara state remains indepdent and slightly amicable for the forseeable future.
  • Meanwhile Spain is torn by provinicalism and gets its butt kicked by everyone.

Reedstilt responds back:
Atahualpa defeats his brother for the Spanish throne.
But how will Spain fall to provincialism under Atahualpa's steadfast imperialistic leadership? :)
An Inca push into Colombia could in-spite-of-a-nail the migration of Chibchan-speaking peoples into Panama, and I could definitely see the Muisca Confederation being an early target for Inca imperialist expansion after they solidify control over Ecuador.
I'm a bit surprised to see the League of Mayapan up and running again, and apparently more centralized than ever. Luckily it looks like the Mexica fix that paradox within a century or so. Apparently the Immutable Forces of Time really want independent Maya kingdoms out of the picture by 1700.
I do really like the idea of a neo-Aymara revival, mainly because that's the sort of unpredictable game-changer that keeps things interesting. Though I have to question why rebellious Ecuadorians who weren't assimilated by force would co-opt a Chimu identity, rather than dissatisfied northern Peruvians who had had their Chimu identity beaten out of them co-opting some other identity to replace what was stolen from them by their imperial overlords.

(CoCo responded by saying that he just liked the word Mayapan so his POD is further back)

___________________________________


/u/RioAbajo responds to OP

This is actually very difficult given how well-trained I am to have violent physical reaction to speculative history, but I'll give it a go. Incidentally, this really shouldn't be as difficult as it is given that my dissertation is on the ways in which social organization in the couple centuries before contact profoundly impacted the first century of Spanish colonialism in the Southwest.
There are two big things that characterize the late pre-contact period in the Southwest that would have to be taken into consideration. First, after AD1275, the overall contraction of the Southwestern "world" in terms of population size, depopulation of certain regions, massive migration, and the decline in long-distance relationships.
Secondly, consequent to the first point, you get the creation of dense, aggregated and multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic communities which sees an increase in novel religious expressions like the Salado and Kachina cults probably to help create community solidarity in these large heterogenous communities.

  • In the Pueblo world the religious experimentation and formalization of the 14th and 15th century continue well into the 16th and 17th centuries creating a nascent sense of pan-Pueblo identity while simultaneously reinforcing regional differences into increasingly distinct ethnicities and other identities. The tension of distinct regional identities makes a pan-Pueblo political system unfeasible, but temporary or small-scale cooperation increases..
  • The movement of Athabaskan peoples into the Four Corners, Mogollon Rim, and Western Plains means that these previously occupied regions are never reoccupied by sedentary agricultural people - the regional contraction of the 14th century are never reversed even as populations begin to recover and grow more dense locally. Hostile interactions between Athabaskan people and sedentary agriculturalists are much lessened without the introduction of the horse but pressure from these nomadic groups helps reinforce whatever nascent pan-Pueblo identity already exists along the Rio Grande and upper Colorado.
  • In the middle of the 16th century the internal tensions in Pueblo society between private ritual life and community-wide ceremony lead to internal conflict within communities about restrictions on ritual knowledge and what constitutes "orthodoxy". The society leaders look down on kachina ritual which serves as the primary form of ritual expression among non-religious specialists. Events like the purging of pro-Spanish supporters at the village of Awatovi or the split at Oraibi (in our timeline) occurred with increasing frequency, usually directed towards non religious specialists. However, by the end of the century Pueblo social organization has drifted towards a more egalitarian distribution of religious duties and participation and away from secret societies - Kachina ritual becomes the primary form of religious expression and Kachina spirits become increasingly standardized between communities due to closer inter-community relationships.
  • In southern Arizona/northern Sonora the Hohokam almost completely disappear archaeologically (if not as a people) by about 1400-1450. The collapse of nascent centralized and hierarchical government in the late 1200's and 1300's (the wars against the "Big Houses" and tyrannical chiefs) means the immediate tendency would be the shy away from large villages and other forms of hierarchy. However, the movement of Athabaskan peoples into the Mogollon Rim and of semi-nomadic groups in northern Mexico into northern Sonora means that competition for resources and periodic raiding necessitate a return to some form of "Great House" social structure, if on a much smaller scale, as a form of defense.
  • Despite being a constant threat, nomadic groups along the periphery of the sedentary agricultural groups are much less a threat without the introduction of horses. Consequently, some of the long-distance trading relationships that dissolved in the centuries of turmoil following 1275 start forming again in the 16th century, linking southern Arizona and the Pueblo world together as well as resuscitating trade relationships with other north Mexican groups for prestige items like macaw feathers. The increasingly centralized control of central Mexico by the Triple Alliance means trade routes into northern Mexico are more and more viable. Southwest turquoise flows south in quantities larger than at any point in the past to furnish the explosion of ritual paraphernalia (especially macaws) related to the increased public control of and participation in ceremony and ritual.

Edit: I would also love to knit-together the Missisippian world with the Southwest, even in some tangential way. Without horses the plains remain a significant barrier, but the increasing movement of people into the southern Plains might facilitate some sort of contact.

/u/Reedstilt responds back:

This is actually very difficult given how well-trained I am to have violent physical reaction to speculative history, but I'll give it a go.
Glad you could fight through it.
the Salado and Kachina cults
I don't think I'm familiar with the Salado; at least, the name isn't sparking any memories? What sort of question do I need to ask in the main subreddit to get an explanation?
Despite being a constant threat, nomadic groups along the periphery of the sedentary agricultural groups are much less a threat without the introduction of horses.
Any thoughts likelihood of the incoming Athabaskans taking a "if you can't beat them, join them" stance one Pueblo society with the absence of the horse? Might we see some Diné or Indeh pueblos in this timeline? Any chances of an eastward expansion of the Pueblo world. Without suffering from mounted raids, I imagine Pecos Pueblo would still be around so the eastern Pueblo "frontier" doesn't collapse. Could additional pueblos be established along the Canadian and Pecos River?
trade routes into northern Mexico are more and more viable.
With trade routes linking the Pueblo region to Mesoamerica again and a resurgence of "Great House" culture in northern Mexico, any thoughts on what might happen at La Junta? Does it stand to benefit from these new trade routes or are they going to be bypassing it for more westerly routes?
I would also love to knit-together the Missisippian world with the Southwest, even in some tangential way. Without horses the plains remain a significant barrier, but the increasing movement of people into the southern Plains might facilitate some sort of contact.
This is the main reason I've been asking about eastern pueblos and La Junta. It won't take much to increase trade interactions between the two areas. Though once the Mississippians get actual cotton plants rather than cotton cloth from the Pueblo, that'll be one less thing they'll need to import. Though those macaw feathers will help fill the void left by cotton. Meanwhile, I hope the Pueblo continue to enjoy yaupon tea with their Mesoamerican chocolate and fine bowwood bows.
Also we need to get /u/Ucumu in here to weigh in on how the Purepecha might profit from these trade routes to northern Mexico and beyond.

/u/RioAbajo responds back:
I don't think I'm familiar with the Salado; at least, the name isn't sparking any memories? What sort of question do I need to ask in the main subreddit to get an explanation?
Something like "How did Pueblo religion change in the 14th century due to outmigration from the Colorado Plateau?".
Salado is really interesting. It is almost entirely based on decorated pottery (Salado Polychromes), so cult might be a bit charitable (but I borrow it from Patty Crown). Think of it like Mesoamerican religion-lite imported to the Southwest. The other really interesting part is how closely associated it is with these large, multi-ethnic communities and how it cuts across traditional "culture areas", showing up in southern Arizona, on the Mogollon Rim, and in the Pueblo area.
Any thoughts likelihood of the incoming Athabaskans taking a "if you can't beat them, join them" stance one Pueblo society with the absence of the horse? Might we see some Diné or Indeh pueblos in this timeline?
This is a really strong possibility. Without the introduction of sheep and horses, a pastoral/nomadic lifestyle is much less viable in these areas and you might very well get some "Pueblos" forming out of these groups.
The other big one is I'm not sure you even get Dine forming as a distinct identity without the Spanish. There are clearly some differences between Apache groups even before the Spanish, but I think without the introduction of European herd animals and the political/economic dynamic created by Spanish colonization those differences might not result in ethnogenesis, or at least not as swiftly as it did happen. Likewise with a distinct "Apache" identity. I imagine there would be some sort of distinct identities forming through the 17th century, but if they would split along the Navajo/Apache line and have the same characteristics, I sort of doubt.
Without suffering from mounted raids, I imagine Pecos Pueblo would still be around so the eastern Pueblo "frontier" doesn't collapse. Could additional pueblos be established along the Canadian and Pecos River?
Definitely. Without the Spanish, that Pueblo "frontier" is even more robust with the Salinas/Jumanos Pueblos sticking around as well as Tijeras Pueblo. I could maybe see some fissioning of Pecos Pueblo during the religious conflict of the 17th century resulting in new Pueblos down the length of the Pecos river. Definitely would strengthen the possibility of connection with the Mississippian world.
t won't take much to increase trade interactions between the two areas. Though once the Mississippians get actual cotton plants rather than cotton cloth from the Pueblo, that'll be one less thing they'll need to import. Though those macaw feathers will help fill the void left by cotton. Meanwhile, I hope the Pueblo continue to enjoy yaupon tea with their Mesoamerican chocolate and fine bowwood bows.
Definitely. I can also see some importation of Southwestern obsidian as a possibility. Copper and coppersmithing is another potential import from both West Mexico and the East. Perhaps this influences southern plains groups to adopt a more intermediary position, trading bison both east and west and acting as middle men taking macaw feathers, cotton, turquoise, and obsidian east and bringing back copper, yaupon, and special woods.
On that note, the La Junta area might get drawn into that same system as the intermediaries with Mesoamerica. You might end up with distinct trade routes, those up the Pacific coast and those up the Gulf side ending in south Texas and then up the Rio Grande to the Pueblo area or out to the Plains and then up the Pecos/through the Salinas.

/u/Ucumu responds a bit later to Reedstilt:
I'm sad I missed this thread.
Assuming things continued the way they were, I think the Mexica would have exerted more control over the Triple Alliance (to the point where we can actually call it the Mexica Empire), and they would have continued their strategy of encircling the P'urépecha while avoiding direct military invasion. I could potentially see a situation where the Kingdom of Tzintzuntzan became the new (albeit much larger) Tlaxcala, an independent enclave within a larger Aztec state. On the other hand, if they chose to start expanding again, they would probably target Zacatula and Colima to the west. Zacatula had already been part of the empire, but defected to the Aztecs. Shortly before European arrival, it had broken away from Aztec control. The P'urépecha could have used that opportunity to reassert their control on the Pacific, possibly targeting Colima in a subsequent war. If that happened they would have their back to the Pacific and could have more easily resisted Aztec encroachement. If there were greater trade with the North then the P'urépecha would have had better access to tin (with the only viable source being in Zacatecas), and could have had more bronze. Although I doubt they would have switched to bronze weaponry as a result. It still would have been expensive. Since they relied on bows and arrows, it would have been a huge waste to shoot bronze at their enemies when obsidian works just fine.
EDIT: Also, if /u/CommodoreCoCO's scenario of the Inca expanding into lower Central America happens, then at some point Central Mexicans need to get llamas. The Central Mexican Plateau is probably one of the few other locations in the Americas were llamas would be well suited. It would be interesting to see what the introduction of llama caravans would do to trade and military organization.

___________________________________


A different user asks

Hmmm, very interesting.
I do wonder if the Inca and the Triple Alliance would continue to expand, if they would ever actually interact with any regularity, and what the repercussions would be. What would those empires look like with a couple more centuries of development?
I'll puzzle this over more tonight, because this is a fun exercise.

OP responds to that

The oncoming Little Ice Age is going to force Ecuadorian shell merchants further north again into the tropical waters off Central America in order to acquire certain species of spondylus and other tropical shells. So that potentially could fuel contact between the two empires, if the Triple Alliance continues to solidify its hold on Guatemala through Q'umarkaj (though it's next big push will likely be from Q'umarkaj into the Yucatan, rather than continuing further south).
Now, without smallpox going around, Huayna Capac isn't likely to die nearly as early as he did, but I wonder how likely he is to split the empire between his kids and end up causing the Inca civil war regardless.

RioAbajo responds to this

The big problem there is solving the Pacific currents, right? As I understand, the coastal currents all strongly flow northwards and then out very far to sea before turning south again. What sort of techniques or technology do the Andeans develop to make the return voyage reliably?

To which OP responds back

According simulations done by Richard Callaghan, the return voyage could be done in as little as 3-4 months, if the sailors left west Mexico in April and were willing to swing fairly widely out to sea for two months. An alternative 5-month route stayed closer to the coast for the most part, but swung out to sea for a week at a time away from the Guatemalan coast, then again between the Gulf of Fonseca and the Gulf of Nicoya.
Establishing permanent settlements in the Galapapos Islands and on Cocos Island might help with the shorter open-ocean route. Though we might need other techniques and technologies to make those voyages reliable (there's some scant evidence to suggest that pre-Columbian Ecuadorian sailors were reaching the Galapagos Islands occassionally). Emphasizing the semi-coastal route is probably better. While longer, it gives these merchants a chance to keep trading along the way.
Another alternative is the keep expanding the Inca north until they conquer the the Tairona, giving them access to Caribbean routes to Mesoamerica and Central America.

That's it, mostly. Thoughts?
 
Every AH scenario along these lines always seems to suggest the Triple Alliance becoming dramatically larger, namely by expanding over both Guatemala and the Yucatan. There's not much basis to think that's so extremely plausible, IMO, aside from the trend of AHers to want to fill the map with as few states as possible and making large empires is the easiest way of going about that. Of course an argument could be made that it's technically feasible considering the Teotihuacano entrada into the Peten a thousand years previously, but given that the details are as sketchy as you'd expect (assuming you knew that detailed historical records from Early Classic Mesoamerica are not forthcoming) and from what we can tell there wasn't any centralized rule coming from Teotihuacan over Tikal and the other city-states they came to, conquest in the vein that most people imagine when writing these scenarios wasn't likely. That, and the Triple Alliance isn't Teotihuacan, whatever Teotihuacan actually was. The Tawantinsuya I think had more in the way of a structure that would allow for conquest than the Mexica did.
 
This might be as good a place to ask as most others:

I have seen very different description where the Dhegihan Siouan speaker started from. There are those who claim they always live on the middle and lower Missouri and Arkansas rivers. But most claim that they migrated from somewhere on the upper or central Ohio, going downriver to ~Cairo when pushed from the NE. Then the Quapaw split off moving to the Arkansas, the Osage split off next near the eponymous river, then the Kaw/Kansa, than the Oto, at last the Ponca on the lower Platte/Niobrara.

But regarding this migration, I have seen very different suggestions when it happened. Ranging from 1000 CE, ie close to the linguistic split from the Chiwere Siouans (Hochunk, Ioway, Missouri, Omaha), via 1400 CE, possibly causing the decline of Cahokia, to ~1650 CE as result of Iroquis hostility during the Beaver Wars.

Is one of these version historically more likely, or can simply not say anything?
 
Proof that some places on Reddit, quite a few actually, there exists excellent discussion by cool-headed people with a vast arena of knowledge.
 
Interesting stuff.

I've always been disappointed at how many with strong historical knowledge have the same reaction as RioAbajo - namely, that counterfactuals are the devil.
 
Huayna Capac still dies eventually, and Atahualpa defeats his brother for the Spanish throne. The empire is unstable, but the conflict plays a similar role as did the Roman civil wars.
This ignores that Huayna Capac's heir was neither Atahualpa nor Huascar, but Ninan Cuyochi, who died in the same plague outbreak as Huayna Capac. And if NC died ahead of HC, the heir in a smooth transition scenario would be Huascar who was the full Cuscan son left in charge of the capital at the time of HC and NC's deathd, not Atahualpa who was a half-Ecuadorian usurper. Maybe Atahualpa still tries to usurp his brother, but I doubt his capability to do that if HC doesn't die in Ecuador in the middle of a campaign and leaves an army there for Atahualpa to pick. His assertion that "the empire is unstable" is pure determinism; he expects a civil war to break out in the Inca empire simply because there was one at that time IOTL, even though the circumstances would be completely different.

Atahualpa's son Macno Inca Yupanqi continues the integration efforts and furthers it with his emphasis on infrastructure.
Manco Inca was not Atahualpa's son! He was another son of Huayna Capac (he had like 50 thanks to poligamy). This very same fact was used by his descendant Titu Cusi Yupanqui decades later in his attempt to reconcile with the Spanish: he pretended in his correspondence that MI had been HC's heir all along and that both Atahualpa and Huascar had usurped him, making them responsible for the war and subsequent conquest (thus exonerating the Spanish of any responsibility, as absurd as it sounds, as the price to get peace and a ticket out of the Vilcabamba backwater).

Unfortunately for the user and Titu Cusi, I don't think that MI would come anywhere near the throne in a no-European scenario. MI wasn't even the first choice of Pizarro for puppet Inca, but yet another of HC's sons, Tupac Huallpa, who was older than MI and died after a few months on the job.

I'm not going to discuss the user's "social" predictions because I don't have the knowledge, but I can't help but be at least a little skeptical after reading everything else.

The Inca military heads further north in 1545. But the Chilean Mapuche to the Incas' south turn on the offensive around 1560. The Ecuadorian territories fall to Inca control, but are not assimilated as the others were. The Mapuche manage to regain some original territory, but they find it difficult to assault the Inca's planned infrastructure. A permanent garrison is placed on the southern border. Focus returns to the north in 1566, and modern Ecuador is completely in control by 1570. The Colombians prove difficult to conquer, but rarely provoke the far-ranging Inca military. In 1597, Musuq Capac orders the first successful coup in a Panamanian polity, establishing a central America puppet state.
Honest question: Did the Mapuche ever go on the offensive IOTL? And were there any "polities" worth of the name state in Panama ever? How do the Inca cope with crossing the Darien Gap, and most importantly, why? Why would the Inca seek terrestrial expansion in Panama when they were content to stay out of the Amazon?

By 1580, strong trade connections have been established with the prosperous Mayapan kingdom, the first true pan-Yucatan state. This generates fast advances in metallurgy and other technologies. The trade fuels a prosperous period of Pax Incae. The empire absorbs its Panama holdings in 1621.
So he has the Mayapan League still around centuries later despite falling 3 decades before Columbus set sail IOTL just because he likes the name as per later comment, and (along with the mysterious Inca interest in Panama) its survival is little but a pretext to give Inca technologies to the Maya. Who then do nothing with them and just fall to the Aztecs. Alright.

Frankly, the contact with Central America would be far earlier than that, and it would be by sea long before the Inca got anywhere near Panama. In fact, it was already there when Huayna Capac died. Tumbes was a center of sea trade with Central America, and not for nothing, the first encounter between Spanish and Andeans was at sea, and Tumbes was the place the Spanish first landed. It's also far likelier that Tupac Yupanqui's supposed prestige expedition to Polinesia was actually to Central America or Mesoamerica (or both). TY was HC's father and immediate predecessor.

In 1682, Mayapan falls to the rebranded Mexica empire, and the Inca lose crucial resources.
What crucial resources would the Inca lose? It's the Andes that have resources. Central America (not Mesoamerica) is the one devoid of anything more than rainforest and mosquitos.

Everything that follows is just, well, so removed from the POD that he can basically do anything he wants under author's prerrogative.

Meanwhile Spain is torn by provinicalism and gets its butt kicked by everyone.
Yeah, because Columbus not setting sail would somehow result in Spain not undergoing the social and political reforms that predate him by decades and Córdoba revolutionazing European warfare in a theatre completely unrelated to him. I'm surprised he didn't go the Guedalla road and have it taken back by zombie Moors. Haw. Haw. 'stupic 'spics suck dick. I rather appreciate people who can discuss Amerindian history without shoehorning "and fuck Spain" at the end.
 
Last edited:
Honest question: Did the Mapuche ever go on the offensive IOTL? And were there any "polities" worth of the name state in Panama ever? How do the Inca cope with crossing the Darien Gap, and most importantly, why? Why would the Inca seek terrestrial expansion in Panama when they were content to stay out of the Amazon?

Against the Inca the Mapuche did not ever go on the offensive, but considering their later expansion across the Andes to conquer Mapuche-influenced cultures in Patagonia there is no reason to think they wouldn't do the same against the Inca's tenuous control in Central Chile.

I also very heavily doubt the Inca would try to expand into Central America, they had enough trouble holding the empire together as-is, and I'm not even convinced they can consolidate all their conquests that happened right before the Spanish arrived. They were massively overstretched across the Atacama, for instance.

http://www.geocurrents.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Chile-Indigenous-Peoples-Map.png is a good reference for this. The Picunches, Pehunches, and Puelches are all Mapuche-influenced cultures, and the Inca fought the Mapuche to a standstill in the middle of Picunche territory. I see absolutely no reason why the Mapuche, who held off a European power as well as a Latin American power right on their doorstep, would not be able to break the Inca's hold on Picunche territory, especially considering the vast stretches of desert separating the Incas from Central Chile.

In fact, it seems pretty plain to me that the Inca and Mapuche would just arbitrarily pick some location in the Atacama to serve as their border, just as Chile and Bolivia did IOTL. As lame as it would be to have their border between Copiapo and Antofagasta, it's the least hospitable, most barren, and most easily demarcated place to do so.

The rest is too distant into uncharted territory to predict accurately in my opinion. EVENTUALLY Europe/Asia/Africa will discover the Americas, but hopefully the two worlds are on a much more equal footing by then. The Mapuche can make a fortune with the Strait of Magellan if they control all of Patagonia, but will they be able to make the transition to a merchant society? Who knows? Can the Inca successfully engage in nation-building from Bolivia to Colombia? There is no way to know if they would have been able to.
 

Spot on. Took the words right out of my mouth.

Against the Inca the Mapuche did not ever go on the offensive, but considering their later expansion across the Andes to conquer Mapuche-influenced cultures in Patagonia there is no reason to think they wouldn't do the same against the Inca's tenuous control in Central Chile.

Tenuous? Dubious claim. Raids can be launched anytime; outright expansion is different.

I also very heavily doubt the Inca would try to expand into Central America, they had enough trouble holding the empire together as-is, and I'm not even convinced they can consolidate all their conquests that happened right before the Spanish arrived. They were massively overstretched across the Atacama, for instance.

Though the reddit poster seems to be off in his assessment, this doesn’t speak to OTL Incan empire-building. It seems telling that there was not a single revolt IOTL Chile against Inca rule, before the Spanish arrival, but instead an ongoing expansion and implementation of the imperial state apparatus across the desert, all the way down to the Maule River. Overextension seems to be overstated here.

http://www.geocurrents.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Chile-Indigenous-Peoples-Map.pngis a good reference for this. The Picunches, Pehunches, and Puelches are all Mapuche-influenced cultures, and the Inca fought the Mapuche to a standstill in the middle of Picunche territory. I see absolutely no reason why the Mapuche, who held off a European power as well as a Latin American power right on their doorstep, would not be able to break the Inca's hold on Picunche territory, especially considering the vast stretches of desert separating the Incas from Central Chile.

In fact, it seems pretty plain to me that the Inca and Mapuche would just arbitrarily pick some location in the Atacama to serve as their border, just as Chile and Bolivia did IOTL. As lame as it would be to have their border between Copiapo and Antofagasta, it's the least hospitable, most barren, and most easily demarcated place to do so.

There’s a factor that changed radically the way in which the Mapuche were able to hold their own and they lacked before European arrival: horses. Without them, their odds against Inca expansionism are slim (though still existent.) If there’s imperial resolve, there’s a wealth of Inca tradition of dogged determination to ruthlessly crush an enemy, no matter the cost: IOTL to the south the Collas, the Charcas, and the Chichas. To the north, the Caranguis and the Cayambis. All fierce defenders of their independence; all brutally crushed.
 
Top