Aww...Glad to hear you're liking it! There won't be a President Hamilton, but a Hamiltonian VP is going to happen (spoilers!).
Nevertheless, I'm excited to see what comes next!
Aww...Glad to hear you're liking it! There won't be a President Hamilton, but a Hamiltonian VP is going to happen (spoilers!).
"I have but one life to give for my country, but I have many bullets to fire in her defense."
- Alexander Hamilton, prominent military figure and future Secretary of State and of Finance (under President John Adams)
Not at all!! Thanks for reminding me I need to update the epithets I had for Hamilton (I was debating having him a VP, finally decided he would be one)Do you mind if I steal this for my signature?
The plan is, in essence, for this Bill of Rights to be a combination of Madison's proposed amendments and the sections from Mason's Virginia Declaration of Rights. Both had the right to bear arms listed.article 5 still exist? and it spefficaly says right to bear arm? was that pretty contingent on event at the time?
I'm pretty sure the Founding Fathers wanted the Bill of Rights/Constitution to be as vague as possible to let it bend with the times. Being clear is not one of their strong suits.Would it be possible to amend "bear Arms" to "bear Arms for said Protection" instead? Thus making it clear that the right is while one is a member of a militia?
That actually makes sense.I'm pretty sure the Founding Fathers wanted the Bill of Rights/Constitution to be as vague as possible to let it bend with the times. Being clear is not one of their strong suits.
I'm pretty sure the Founding Fathers wanted the Bill of Rights/Constitution to be as vague as possible to let it bend with the times. Being clear is not one of their strong suits.
HeX is right here. Also, if there was to be any greater explanation, it might well be in the opposite direction: Mason's Rights specifically stated "that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty." It'd be interesting to put this in, but I don't think I will.Would it be possible to amend "bear Arms" to "bear Arms for said Protection" instead? Thus making it clear that the right is while one is a member of a militia?
Clay was vaguely antislavery IRL by the time that Jackson's Revolution (as the Civil War will be called ITTL) occurred, so he probably wouldn't be too raring to fight for the slavers.Remembering that this timeline will feature an early civil war, I'm going to guess men like Clay and Webster won't be too prominent in this world.
I mentioned Webster because of his ability to compromise and that he helped negotiate with Calhoun over the nullification crisis. I thought maybe an absence of him and clay would allow America to veer closer to civil war earlier.Clay was vaguely antislavery IRL by the time that Jackson's Revolution (as the Civil War will be called ITTL) occurred, so he probably wouldn't be too raring to fight for the slavers.
Though this gets a bit beyond into the future, I have rough ideas for what happens to Clay. He'll actually be a President ITTL, part of the Nationalist Republican Party, and see out the Score of Good Feelings. That being said, you bring up a good point that when I get to Jackson's Revolution, I should probably focus in on Clay for a hot minute.
As for Webster, I'm assuming you're talking about Daniel Webster here? If so, why?
Fair enough. Webster probably will be a minor political figure ITTL, maybe a VP for a candidate or two (not sure yet, obviously). But good points, obviously, didn't consider those!!I mentioned Webster because of his ability to compromise and that he helped negotiate with Calhoun over the nullification crisis. I thought maybe an absence of him and clay would allow America to veer closer to civil war earlier.
National Republican Party forms earlier than 1832 ITTL (don't wanna get too much into that just yet). Davy Crockett is... interesting. I haven't considered him yet, but he won't be fiddling in Mexico ITTL. Probably will be out exploring the Midwest.@Bennett , interested to see the future Clay presidency and a more prominent National Republican party that lasts beyond 1832.
Which makes me wonder, any plans for Davy Crockett?
(I had him as the first National Republican president in one of my timelines, actually)
the Burnball American Organization (BAO) -- does exist for the sport, but it is an odd entity in that it is, also, technically an organ of the United States military.
You're lucky you're choosing the timeline that updates about once a month, then! I have a break coming up soon, so hopefully I'll get back onto updating this. I have a lot of this timeline planned out in my head, but putting it down on paper is super hard for me.This world takes the phrase America's pastime literally! This whole timeline is amazing, and this post in particular - I love to see cultural tidbits like this. Don't know how I didn't see this timeline before, but I'm glad to be catching up now