oh damm this will have major repruccasion also deifntily another war coming over that area
we need to see how the US develops and how Britain able to fill the areas with loyalist and future settlers. People in general just wanted to be left alone to do their thing and not looking for fight.
but yeah major change compared to iotl.
With the Frontier closed for now, how will American colonists expand themselves? OTL, some claimed it was a safety valve to prevent social dissent by sending poorer sectors off West.
And it seems Southern states are larger, maybe due to the fact most of the colonies' charters allowed them to expand until the Pacific.
Yes the Americans will need to adjust their thinking. Where will the Americans who went to the North West go? Some won’t leave so there is ramifications with that, some will migrate to areas south of Ohio River which means more smaller farms and more settlers. Some will move west to the “northwest” regardless of who controls it. Just like some move to Ontario regardless of British control over it. They be attracted to available land.
As for the Southern States they be split soon enough and while some may be pro slavery there be a lot more settlers and that mean smaller farms instead of large plantation (some will exists) but settlement will change and with more settlers there might be less support for slavery. But we also need to remember st this time slavery was legal in New York State also.
One thing that also impacted is the interaction between 5 civilized tribes and white settlers as more competition for land.
Those are some interesting borders in the United States...I do wonder what will happen in the future there...especially with the French Revolutionary War and the Napoleonic Wars...
Borders set from Afar do not take into consideration people who might live in the area. Native groups now might be living on both sides of the border. How will they become impacted? This is similar to the map drawing of the Scramble for Africa. With people in area having to deal with the agreement made without their inputs.
This is a game changer for sure. We will need to see if Britain and USA develop that close relationship as per iotl.
Will the US look for additional trading partners beyond Britain? How will the US politicians and people see Europe? What will it’s relationship be with Portugal? All very interesting questions.
British investment played a huge role in the early development and Industrialization of the US (especially northern states. How will that play out. Money always finds it way to where there is profit to be made but will it be to the same extent. Britain can now direct both government and private investment into the BNA. I am interested to see if we see the development of earlier canals linking the Great Lakes/ St Lawrence to the Atlantic. Could we see ships sail to the Great Lakes directly from Britain by 1800? Don’t see the Eerie canal being built since the Americans only have a small portion of Lake Ontario and rest part of BNA. a British canal system to the lakes would be a huge game changer both in the interior provinces development and settlement.
now to your question about French Revolution Wars and subsequent Napoleon Wars that be interesting. First and foremost there is no impact of these changes to Europe (Nothing that would impact them happening). This could make Britain stronger with a better supply of wood and other ship building materials. Might even result in stronger shipbuilding capability in BNA. Food production could be greater with large amount being sent to Britain, therefore much less reliant on US.
The border tensions and native attacks on American settlers in Northwest that were one of the irritants and caused of war of 1812 may not exist depending on settler patterns and native behavior. The manor in which natives in southern states adopted European agriculture could happen in north. There could be border skirmishes snd tensions but nothing like iotl.
The other major difference is that we will be dealing with an economical weaker US and wonder if that translate to more hostile US or cautious one? That a question to address in future.
lastly is the sale of French Louisiana to the US. How would the British react to it. That could be POD for an outbreak of war between USA and Britain, not saying it will. Britain could seize part of it or attempt to capture it all. That very important future event (maybe France not sell it since a weaker and poorer US can’t afford or Congress reneges on ratifying the agreement. Could Britain and US seize it and divide along existing areas of control? Giving Britain the northern half and US the southern and acess to the Pacific or would we see the seizure of it by Britain and subsequently movement Americans to west results in new countries along the west coast. Oh the possibilities.
This is economically devastating to the Growth of the US. Loosing not only the Great Lakes but also diminishing the value of the Mississippi while irrevocably boosting the Slavocratic South.
Yes as I have mentioned above there are mayor changes to the US as we know it. To the US in the TL it will be a shift south but not necessarily one to more Slave owning states. The souther US west will receive maybe double the number of settlers (maybe 3X) compared to iotl. That have an impact on settlement, size of farms and settlers. You may have areas that have many more smaller farms and less demand for slaves.
another thing is will this means more industry in south and central US as opposed concentrated one New England and northern US. how will slavery play out with an more industrious South?
the Mississippi becomes crucial for both only the US but also BNA as the lands south of Great Lakes would also benefit from use of the river and port along coast. A neutral Louisiana? Is that possible to guarantee acess to the Mississippi? Oh boy did I open up a can of worms. Lol.