That's exactly what the mughals were trying to do, They were smarter than the other Turkic and Afghani lords before themAre you serious?
Britain enforced the caste system they exploited it. So apartheid is more humane for india than indians ruling themselves?
Seriously you think some white supremacy and european oppression was the more the humane thing for india? First you suggest having the colonist breed there way to victory creating a loyal class and to then suppress the natives. This sounds like some next level colonialism and imperialism being said here.
Yeah shashi tharoor does it brilliantlyHave you tried comparing economic development in 1800 india vs 1950 india?
they will never assimilate or be equals as britain will never see them as equal humans they were a colony.You are totally mis reading the post I stay that it is more humane when the British treat the Indians as equals That's the only way the racies can mingle and produce are another caste if you may of people who are more likely to rule this is nothing unique in human history
White supremacist was the english policy in the OTL which limited intermarriage with locals and created a ruling caste of Indians who were englishmen culturally but indian in blood.
What I propose is more humane as this way English will over decades completely assimilate in india just like mughals did
You are being unnecessarily provocativethey will never assimilate or be equals as britain will never see them as equal humans they were a colony.
So what are you saying indians are naturally savage? and they must be civilised by english and must adopt the west?
All you are saying is we need to wipe out the native population by breeding them into submission.
Far from it my friend dont even get me started on the genocidal food policies of british right upto 1943Don't do apologetics for colonial racism. Assuming anything that divides and abuses people is "humane", is a losing bet.