Realistic Luft' 46 Development in an Axis Victory

Hello! Last year I made an alternate aviation thread discussing WWI with Italy in the Central Powers. Here I am gonna jump forward a few decades to post-war, except in a timeline where the Axis (at least in Europe) have won. I still think that development and research into advanced designs would have happened even in the event of a win because the inability to invade the UK and especially the United States means that air raids (one of the main driving forces for more advanced designs) would still happen, amongst advanced allied fighter designs too.

NOTE: Assume all of the designs I mention would be using German materiel in place of the OTL WAllied materiel.

Focke-Wulf:
Obviously the iconic Ta-183 project comes to mind:
220px-Ta_183_Modell.jpg

Now the Ta-183 was theoretically a good design, but post-war testing of swept wing aircraft from OTL suggests that some issues could be present. This includes stability issues at low speeds and stall concerns. If the design does work, it would still likely have a performance at max of late production MiG-9s and early F-84s (not bad for what would be one of the first jets). This is with the added bonus of a swept wing, of course.

To rectify the design to be better, it would need to evolve. Fortunately, Kurt Tank actually gave us an idea of that:
df3zp5y-c8731eb1-2059-461a-8b85-7e8b98dee77a.jpg

Meet the Pulqui II, the second major Argentinian jet design, and also the second by a European (the first being from Dewoitine). The Pulqui II was designed by Kurt Tank and was an evolution of the Ta-183. Aside from the wing design caused stalls at certain angles of attack, this would likely be a better working design. This would probably appear by the early-50s. Now obviously aside from maybe exports "Pulqui II" wouldn't be the German name. Perhaps Ta-283? The design most heavily associated with this name is actually a misnomer as "Ta-283" was never used OTL, which possibly leaves it for here.
12174-c1399918fd8cd8723b86fc7333102058.jpg

The ultimate design (at least that we can more directly infer) would be the bottom design in this picture. It would be an all-weather interceptor with a stronger engine, and according to the forum* this appears on this likely would have performance similar to the F-86K.

A decade later we have this design:
300px-HAL_%28Hindustan_Aeronautics%29%2C_HF-24%2C_Marut_%287585415088%29.jpg

The HAL HF-24 Marut was an Indian jet fighter design that reached production. While this was admittedly underperforming for the 1960s, it did serve well in the ground attack role. In fact, being a bit slower as a ground attack aircraft at the time wasn't uncommon.

Messerschmitt:
With Messerschmitt their notable P.1101 comes to mind:
UroDJC_N6FlS4l6QBFv1caMWco7SuqPa01Th6yIP1E3uXEiSWLN__nM_BfvI0NP8Q8Vzoj5gg_zs1oW3VgM


This incomplete aircraft would be taken to the US and almost exactly copied into the Bell X-5 OTL:
Bell-X-5-in-flight.jpg

While the design proved fast, and the swing wing worked (though the P.1101 could only change the incidence on the ground), the design was flawed. It was fast and light but the layout of the aircraft was dangerous. One of the prototypes was destroyed in a spin that could not be saved. The Me P.1101 ITTL would maybe just be stuck as a research aircraft, and if it is used as a fighter it would probably be stuck with lesser wing sweeps for safety reasons.

In the end, a better design that Messerschmitt would probably move forward with is something along the lines of the Me P.1110 (swastika warning):
15786-21d4a76ebfa3fb682ffe02d9c9b3eebd.jpg

This design had two versions with a V-tail and a conventional tail, and each version had a difference intake for the engine. I think the more conventional of the two would probably work the best. This also seems logical considering that one of the Messerschmitt designers would go to Sweden and work on the SAAB Lansen.

Eventually Messerschmitt would (as the man himself did in Egypt) probably create an aircraft like this:
300px-HA-300_side.jpg

The HA-300, originally developed in Spain and then moved to Egypt after an initial cancellation, this light fighter was very fast and (mostly) up to the requirements of the time. This is the extent of how (imo) we can view Messerschmitt's developments ITTL.

Other:
West Germany in OTL developed some VTOL aircraft:
188706-12660-44-pristine.jpg

fw860-box.jpg

EWR_VJ_101_in_1964.jpg

Here are just a few of them, with several companies combining to form the bottom aircraft, the EWR VJ 101. VTOL aircraft became a huge priority at one point in Western Germany because of the Warsaw Pact being the closest to them. Therefore, interceptors that could takeoff this fast were desperately needed. In an Axis victory timeline whether these would be looked into is anyone's guess, but I don't discount it.

Bombers:
I will mostly focus on Junkers for this part, mainly due to what happened with OKB-1:
dr-brunolf-baades-weird-wings-lineage-ju-287-okb-1-250-v0-fi6lfglx1z3b1.jpg

The Ju-287 was evolved upon by German designers that were taken by the USSR and pressed into work. Here we can see a good idea of how this plane would evolve. This would likely be an early post-war tactical bomber for Germany. The EF-132, which did have some glider testing in the USSR would be a likely heavy bomber. The OKB-1 150 could be an early-1950s design.

To address the elephant in the room:
nevington-horten-ho-xviii-a1_orig.jpg

Obviously this long range heavy bomber design must be mentioned. This is a bit tough. First generation jet engines could not make long ranges because they were not very fuel efficient. As time would go on this could, however, mature into a realistic design. The YB-49 proved that a design like this was flyable. With time this could work.

So this is my little thread detailing this not too commonly explored idea. I like aviation, and with alternate history why not put this here! :) Any thoughts?
----
*https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/iae-27-31-pulqui-i-and-ii.3386/

(I take no credit for any pictures that appear in this post.)
 

Attachments

  • 1719712562772.jpeg
    1719712562772.jpeg
    25 KB · Views: 29
I do see this Germany lagging behind the Wallies due to lack of resources post war. Though with a lot of funding they could still build a significant airforce. The longer the regime survives though, the harder it would be to predict what they would field.

West Germany did play around with some delta wings otl , I do see them building an equivalent to the Mirage III
 
Alot of the designs were not good in themselves. They look good they look sexy but when you took up the ones that were built, either by the Germans or Allies post war they were dangerous and/or not capable of what the Luftwaffe was told they would be. Winkle Brown flew most of the ones Post WW2 and the US ones were flown at Muroc(Edwards) post war and were improved upon by the allies, P1011 becoming the F86 for example and the Pulqui fighter having so many problems that they only produced 5 flying examples that had numerous crashes even with the designer working and flying them.
 
Last edited:
Engine-wise the development of the Atar gives us a good roadmap for German engines to the early 1960s - a good way to show Germany lagging in aviation would be fore them to take the Atar path of constantly iterating on the BMW 003, as well as the BMW 018 for high-power applications.
 
Alot of the designs were not good in themselves. They look good they look sexy but when you took up the ones that were built, either by the Germans or Allies post war they were dangerous and/or not capable of what the Luftwaffe was told they would be. Winkle Brown flew most of the ones Post WW2 and the US ones were flown at Muroc(Edwards) post war and were improved upon by the allies, P1011 becoming the F86 for example and the Pulqui fighter having so many problems that they only produced 5 flying examples that had numerous crashes even with the designer working and flying them.
Yeah, though with the Pulqui II the main problem was the wing position. The idea to move the wing to the shoulder position may have prevented a heavy system to work around the engine, but it caused the stall issues. It should be noted that another major issue was that the Argentine industry was (understandably) not as up to date as that of major powers. This caused one of the crashes, which was due to poor manufacturing and not the design itself.

I do see this Germany lagging behind the Wallies due to lack of resources post war. Though with a lot of funding they could still build a significant airforce. The longer the regime survives though, the harder it would be to predict what they would field.

West Germany did play around with some delta wings otl , I do see them building an equivalent to the Mirage III
Thanks for the link! One thing Germany would be ahead on was swept wing designs. A lot of people outside of Germany didn't take swept wing designs seriously until they saw the German plans in 1945. Without this, swept wing development in the allies would probably lag behind even just a bit.
 
P1101 did not become the F86 Sabre, it was an entirely home grown design that was altered to take a swept wing. Look at the naval FJ-1 Fury to give an idea of what the original P-86 looked like.

The Bell X-4 is a slightly enlarged P1101 but proposals to adopt it as a fighter foundered largely due to inadequate fuel tankage inherited from the basic Messerschmitt design.

In any case, P1101 was only ever intended as a research machine, the P1112 was the end of the fighter studies. It didn’t look like a viable fighter. Like most of the Luft 46 types, it’s just too small and all of them were based around the Heinkel HeS011 engine, that the US and the French couldn’t get to work. The Me P1110/01 is the most feasible of the Messerschmitt designs. Bit bigger for more fuel and a decent engine and it could have worked well. The Swedish Lansen is very similar.

Part of Pulqui II’s problems lay with the fact that Tank didn’t have Hans Multhopp with him in Argentina.
 
Last edited:

thaddeus

Donor
in a Cold War scenario, it seems to me the LW would be flying some cobbled together, mixed propulsion aircraft, with use of their existing designs and tooling to every extent possible.

twin fuselage 109s & 190s, mixed propulsion AR-234s/DO-335s. they schemed "small" jets for a version of the V-1 weapon, so a manned version of that. the JU-287 reused parts in the manner I'm speculating.

think the more advanced cutting edge designs would appear after 1950.
 
Alot of the designs were not good in themselves. They look good they look sexy but when you took up the ones that were built, either by the Germans or Allies post war they were dangerous and/or not capable of what the Luftwaffe was told they would be. Winkle Brown flew most of the ones Post WW2 and the US ones were flown at Muroc(Edwards) post war and were improved upon by the allies, P1011 becoming the F86 for example and the Pulqui fighter having so many problems that they only produced 5 flying examples that had numerous crashes even with the designer working and flying them.
That is the nature of immature designs that were for the most part only tested halfheartedly. The Luftwaffe wasn't done with many of its projects, so of course they weren't so amazing when the Allies picked up the captured designs.
 
They’re going to have a requirement for roughy strip prop cargo and ground support aircraft for the ongoing “policing” matters. Which means six designs in limited production doesn’t it?
 
Hello again!

I have (mostly) finished moving so I can get more heavily involved with this again.

On air combat and technological advantages vs disadvantages:
I mentioned this briefly earlier, but Germany would be ahead of the WAllies in swept wing technology, even if temporarily. Although there were some notable studies, swept wing technology was not taken that seriously outside of Germany until documents were discovered and seized from said country. Therefore, instead of the swept wing that gave the F-86 its characteristic look, it would be the original straight wing variant:
North_American_NA-140-XP-86_3-view.png

However, due to the design not meeting its specifications (largely due to the lack of a swept wing) it may be cancelled in favor of the F-84 and later F-80 models.* In whatever the first proxy war of this timeline may be, German fighters would be superior when fighting at transonic speeds due to their better stability at those speeds and better ability to reach them. May the F-86D Sabre of this timeline becomes like the F-84F and F9F-6, an aircraft that is distinguishable by its upgrade to a swept wing. WAllied aircraft would probably be updated to swept wings over time after witnessing German designs in combat and/or through intelligence.

P1101 did not become the F86 Sabre, it was an entirely home grown design that was altered to take a swept wing. Look at the naval FJ-1 Fury to give an idea of what the original P-86 looked like.

The Bell X-4 is a slightly enlarged P1101 but proposals to adopt it as a fighter foundered largely due to inadequate fuel tankage inherited from the basic Messerschmitt design.

In any case, P1101 was only ever intended as a research machine, the P1112 was the end of the fighter studies. It didn’t look like a viable fighter. Like most of the Luft 46 types, it’s just too small and all of them were based around the Heinkel HeS011 engine, that the US and the French couldn’t get to work. The Me P1110/01 is the most feasible of the Messerschmitt designs. Bit bigger for more fuel and a decent engine and it could have worked well. The Swedish Lansen is very similar.

Part of Pulqui II’s problems lay with the fact that Tank didn’t have Hans Multhopp with him in Argentina.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply! So with Hans Multhopp the Pulqui II (or "Ta-283") would probably have been more successful. Also, it is interesting to note that a Messerschmitt designer, Herman Behrbohm, went to Sweden after WWII. In fact, Sweden also got multiple Messerschmitt design studies. Therefore, the Me P.1110/01 becoming a "Lansen-esque" aircraft is not unreasonable.

They’re going to have a requirement for roughy strip prop cargo and ground support aircraft for the ongoing “policing” matters. Which means six designs in limited production doesn’t it?
This might be pretty easy for the Germans. In OTL, Germany fought French resistance with Re.2002s taken from Italy after the armistice, though Germany was considering leasing some before the armistice anyway. So lend-lease of cheaper aircraft might have been the way to go here. In fact, the Ju-87s later developments did take some inspiration from the Po-2 and R-5 over the USSR. So the Ju-87 may last longer as an anti-resistance aircraft. As technology develops, the Hs-132 would probably be used in anti-resistance in addition to its ground attack and diver-bomber roles.
Henschel_Hs_132_wiki.jpg

The original F-86 design never flew, and it was only in wind tunnel tests where the design was tested and then improved with swept wings. Therefore, we can't entirely know for sure if it would not be able to best the F-84 and stronger F-80 models. (Though we still have an idea based on wind tunnel tests.)
 
Slight problem the engine the Ta-183 was supposed to use never delivered its intended thrust and that was post war with German engineers and access to proper materials.
The Luftwaffe was run by Nazis and How's character for them,they chose the engines.
that looked to deliver the best performance with a deal of risk instead of the ones that would have the fewest risks but lower proformence.
 
A few years back I had a play with the Dornier Do-335, IOTL the Germans experimented with mounting a jet engine in the rear in place of the piston engine that was originally positioned there.
I removed the front prop engine as well and made minor modifications to the tail and wings and imagined larger more and more powerful engines being mounted over time.

LaWcfEd.png

The final pic reminds me of the Mig-21, not as sleek and more than likely not as well performing but the resemblance was surprising to me at least.
 
A few years back I had a play with the Dornier Do-335, IOTL the Germans experimented with mounting a jet engine in the rear in place of the piston engine that was originally positioned there.
I removed the front prop engine as well and made minor modifications to the tail and wings and imagined larger more and more powerful engines being mounted over time.

LaWcfEd.png

The final pic reminds me of the Mig-21, not as sleek and more than likely not as well performing but the resemblance was surprising to me at least.
This is amazing! It looks like a realistic development as well.
Slight problem the engine the Ta-183 was supposed to use never delivered its intended thrust and that was post war with German engineers and access to proper materials.
The Luftwaffe was run by Nazis and How's character for them,they chose the engines.
that looked to deliver the best performance with a deal of risk instead of the ones that would have the fewest risks but lower proformence.
That is definitely a hurdle that Germany needs to work around. How much was the HeS 011 originally supposed to produce? Both the Jumo 004 and BMW 003 had variants that either approached or surpassed its achieved thrust. This means that @CV12Hornet probably is right in that the "ATAR" is a good idea of how German jet engine development would play out.
 
That is definitely a hurdle that Germany needs to work around. How much was the HeS 011 originally supposed to produce? Both the Jumo 004 and BMW 003 had variants that either approached or surpassed its achieved thrust. This means that @CV12Hornet probably is right in that the "ATAR" is a good idea of how German jet engine development would play out.
The Germans aimed for the 1000-2000kg thrust range. Probably toward the higher end, as the engine was supposed to be suitable for single-engine projects as opposed to the BMW 003 and Jumo 004, which were only suitable for twin-engine designs. Later iterations were supposed to produce 3700 lbs of thrust.
 
This is amazing! It looks like a realistic development as well.
Thank you.
It was just gradual changes I made using ideas and sections from WWII era jet aircraft, there were actually about 9 or 10 pics that I made but these give a better idea of how the plane could have been developed with time.

BTW here's a link to the Alternate Combat Aircraft thread - https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/alternate-history-combat-aircraft.457446/
The majority of the pics posted there are of alternate combat planes made by members of AH.com.
A lot of alt-Luft.46 designs.
 
Top