Rating the Governors

Bob Riley (R-AL) [5]
Sean Parnell (R-AK) [6]
Jodi Rell (R-CT) [5]
Charlie Crist (I-FL) [15]
Linda Lingle (R-HI) [2]
Butch Otter (R-ID) [5]
Mitch Daniels (R-IN) [18]
Mark Parkinson (D-KS) [4]
Bobby Jindal (R-LA) [37]
John Baldacci (D-ME) [5]
Martin O'Malley (D-MD) [13]
Tim Pawlenty (R-MN) [4]
Brian Schweitzer (D-MT) [16]
Dave Heineman (R-NE) [5]
Jim Gibbons (R-NV) [5]
John Lynch (D-NH) [11]
Chris Christie (R-NJ) [22]
Bill Richardson (D-NM) [18]
John Hoeven (R-ND) [10]
Donald Carcieri (R-RI) [7]
Mike Rounds (R-SD) [5]
Gary Herbert (R-UT) [5]
Jim Douglas (R-VT) [19]

Parkinson to Christie.
 
Democratic mock primaries are now locked:

Mark Parkinson (D-KS)
John Baldacci (D-ME)
Martin O'Malley (D-MD)
Brian Schweitzer (D-MT)
John Lynch (D-NH)
Bill Richardson (D-NM)

Tentative Republican list expecting no changes:

Mitch Daniels (R-IN)
Bobby Jindal (R-LA)
Chris Christie (R-NJ)
John Hoeven (R-ND)
Donald Carcieri (R-RI)
Jim Douglas (R-VT)

And as for independents:

Charlie Crist (I-FL)


This will be a very interesting scenario. RogueBeaver, want to work together on it?

Also, Parkinson to Douglas.
 
I am vetoing that idea, because there are more liberals than conservatives on this Board, so it will be a (D) win by default. See any of the presidential FBWI threads. Continue playing as normal.
 
I am vetoing that idea, because there are more liberals than conservatives on this Board, so it will be a (D) win by default. See any of the presidential FBWI threads. Continue playing as normal.

Also, this game started with the understanding that it would be played straight. If it were to be done otherwise, we may have played it differently. Liberal forumites, for example, may have played votes against Richardson or Lynch so that more solid Liberal Establishment governors remain.

O'Malley to Hoeven
 
Bob Riley (R-AL) [5]
Sean Parnell (R-AK) [6]
Jodi Rell (R-CT) [5]
Charlie Crist (I-FL) [15]
Linda Lingle (R-HI) [2]
Butch Otter (R-ID) [5]
Mitch Daniels (R-IN) [18]
Mark Parkinson (D-KS) [1]
Bobby Jindal (R-LA) [39]
John Baldacci (D-ME) [5]
Martin O'Malley (D-MD) [13]
Tim Pawlenty (R-MN) [4]
Brian Schweitzer (D-MT) [16]
Dave Heineman (R-NE) [5]
Jim Gibbons (R-NV) [5]
John Lynch (D-NH) [11]
Chris Christie (R-NJ) [22]
Bill Richardson (D-NM) [18]
John Hoeven (R-ND) [10]
Donald Carcieri (R-RI) [7]
Mike Rounds (R-SD) [5]
Gary Herbert (R-UT) [5]
Jim Douglas (R-VT) [20]

Parkinson to Jindal.
 
Bob Riley (R-AL) [5]
Sean Parnell (R-AK) [6]
Jodi Rell (R-CT) [5]
Charlie Crist (I-FL) [15]
Linda Lingle (R-HI) [3]
Butch Otter (R-ID) [5]
Mitch Daniels (R-IN) [19]
Bobby Jindal (R-LA) [39]
John Baldacci (D-ME) [2]
Martin O'Malley (D-MD) [14]
Tim Pawlenty (R-MN) [4]
Brian Schweitzer (D-MT) [16]
Dave Heineman (R-NE) [6]
Jim Gibbons (R-NV) [4]
John Lynch (D-NH) [11]
Chris Christie (R-NJ) [23]
Bill Richardson (D-NM) [18]
John Hoeven (R-ND) [10]
Donald Carcieri (R-RI) [7]
Mike Rounds (R-SD) [5]
Gary Herbert (R-UT) [5]
Jim Douglas (R-VT) [20]

Baldacci to Daniels.
 
I am vetoing that idea, because there are more liberals than conservatives on this Board, so it will be a (D) win by default. See any of the presidential FBWI threads. Continue playing as normal.

It won't be up to a poll. It'll be plotted out using logic and reason. We can keep playing the game as well.

Crist to Douglas.
 
Top