Recessions don’t actually exist. Even less so than political parties or ideologies.
Recessions are a normal science or common knowledge term to talk about repeated aggregate negative growth over time. The aggregation is an imposed concept: even the state in these wage labour societies doesn’t command the economy in aggregate. Macro tools don’t allow for such a command, even closely controlled state property producing for market (post offices, etc) can’t determine aggregate growth. You can prime the pump: you can’t actually do the pumping no matter the size of your state enterprises. (More over most capitalist states are controlled by bodies of men opposed to aggregate control).
People don’t experience the economy in aggregate: they purchase individual consumption bundles in local labour markets. Or they own capital bundles that vary from the aggregate: always with less state enterprise than aggregate, often with a market plan (don’t bet on the bad ones), sometimes with a fixation such as selling Fords in Mayfield West. This means that for many, despite the system wide affects, aggregate accounts are poor matches.
The long aggregate recession for Australian workers since the 1970s is a case in point: non labour markets achieved growth over inflation. The labour market did not.
So with multiple causes and multiple outcomes “recession” is a really poor category. What do you want to actually do:
fuck the workers?
tank industry specific growth?
tank long term growth?
convertibility or macro indicator crisis?
weaken one state compared to others?
Recessions conceptually mask those and others. Their local or market effects are complex and “fun.” Flipping on or off major structures such as state enterprise or expense, tarriffs or float prices, land release or closure, there are loads of ways you can shut down growth.
Dead locked state agent who is a major investor, and expected state expenditure changes is a good one. Then you have the party and the faction have differing opinions on macro indicators combined with government instability.
The most important thing is to wait. Whatever consensual or regulatory system will be subverted and fail. However this doesn't play into your need for agency for PODs.