I have a question whats the earliest a united Italy can be achieved? With a pod after 600AD.
With such a PoD, it could simply never fall apart in the first place, and instead centralise, as France did.
At this point, though, you have the Byzantines to contend with...
And they are quite powerfull at this point...
The Southern Peninsula wasnt thought as "Italy" at this time, so an united Italy at this time doesnt need to include it. Of course, in 600 Byzanz also contrilled the Exarchate of Ravenna, okay, yes, but nontheless, my point stands - you can simpyl wait until the Kingdom of Italy forms in the 9th century, and then have it centralise throughout teh centrueis like France did.
Having a weaker Frankish Empire would help quite a bit... Or have them concentrate more on either Spain or the lands to their east (Saxony etc...).
Weaker Frankish Empire? Why that? Then you have a Langobardic Kingdom... just have the Kingdom of Italy appear in teh Frankish divisions as IOTL.
Id assume the same, but the Kingdom of Italy was one of the Frankish successor states! One of the Lotharingian successor states, to be exact, established at the Prüm Partition 855. Strange that there is no English wiki article, and the mao sucks, but, well: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teilung_von_PrümAh...
I assumed that the OP required it to be independent too...
In that case... Charlemagne away...![]()
I'd assume the same, but the Kingdom of Italy was one of the Frankish successor states! One of the Lotharingian successor states, to be exact, established at the Prüm Partition 855. Strange that there is no English wiki article, and the mao sucks, but, well: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teilung_von_Pr%C3%BCm
Lotharingia was divided, and Louis II became King of Italy. Charles' territory is of coruse the Inevitable Kingdom of Burgundy (later divided into Upper and Lower Burgundy), and Lothar IIs territory is Lotharingia proper, which later fell to Germany (and Burgundy and Italy formed the HREGN as an union with Germany, of course).
As long as u have the Pope stuck in Rome claiming temporal authority i d say never...
As long as you have the Pope stuck in Rome claiming temporal authority, I'd say never...
With Italy i mean at least the Apenian peninsuala and a nice northern border and not the Roman Rubiconwhere there Italy starts.
Also thank you all for the information i already gained by reading your answers.![]()
No surviving Ostrogothic kingdom please im making a TL with a largely united Italy but i need some advice.
The ostrogotic kingdom will be a nice alpine kingdom![]()
No surviving Ostrogothic kingdom please, I'm making a TL with a largely united Italy but i need some advice.
The ostrogotic kingdom will be a nice alpine kingdom![]()
But then where to put the lombards? hmm Bohemia![]()
On the other hand, you could have a more successful Byzantine Italy that reconquers the entire peninsula, and then at some time later have an unified Italy emerge as a Byzantine successor state under some Exarch that breaks with Constantinople.