alternatehistory.com

From what OTL history has told us, fascism has been prejudicial towards govermental balance. While other forms of government have been proven to be effective or at least honest in the ways they handled their governmental checks and balances, fascism has only spawned examples of pseudo-monarchical absolute dictatorships. I do not know how fascist theorists didn't denounce this, instead focusing on theories of national unity and monopartidarism. They didn't explain what kind of government to use in a fascist state, be it a monarchy or hereditary oligarchy or elective single-opinion democracy.
So, could a fascist government have at least theoretically implemented a decentralized government system with at least a few checks and balances (such as separation between executive, legislative, and judiciary) or was the ideology doomed from the start?
Top