So, his is something I've been pondering both for my current timeline a Britain of panthers abd lions but also for other timelines where the Stuart's are on the throne without a bill of rights.
Would the office of prime minister and the ascendancy of Robert Walpole be inevitable or was it a chance of fate? Could either rise without the glorious revolution of 1688?
Of so, would Walpole necessarily need to be a Whig?
Would the office of prime minister and the ascendancy of Robert Walpole be inevitable or was it a chance of fate? Could either rise without the glorious revolution of 1688?
Of so, would Walpole necessarily need to be a Whig?