Happy Easter everybody!
First of all, I'm glad to see Jack's back; I admit I've feared that one of our finest writer could have orphaned us of P&S
I've fallen behind with the installments, so forgive me if I go back with chapters.
Very funny reference to "time fans found themselves unable to phone the speaking clock"; it made me LOL, it's probably the last thing I've thought in an imminent war situation, but time fans need love too. More seriously I understand all the government's fuzz about somenthing not so exciting as a microscopic phone grid: something is always better than nothing, especially when you have to persuade your citizens that you're just not watchin' them dying by radiation sickness or forced labour.
Glad you're still enjoying it;
P&S is still very much alive - just a case of finding time to get updates out these days.
My tongue was very firmly in my cheek when talking about the speaking clock; it's probably testament to my having had the internet etc for most of my lifetime, but the speaking clock has always seemed very strange and pointless to me. Still, I thought it was interesting that the war warning system used the same line as it, so I decided to throw it in.
You're absolutely right in suggesting that, though the actual result of this action is minimal, it's a means for the government to try and show that they're doing something other than shoot looters etcetera.
How on the earth you can obtain a group suicide with a claw hammer? You need a hell of a ricochet...
Goodbye
President Pretorious, I wonder what will happen to the refugees, BTW.
Belgian Government alive, that's kinda surprise: I've thought that BeNeLux has become a wasteland; probably they've already formed a Flemish and a Waloons party inside the bunker.
In response to your first question -
messily. Still, madness and isolation can have some nasty effects upon people.
The refugees happened to be on the
Pretorious at the time, which makes what will happen to them now something of a closed question...
BeNeLux is looking pretty wasteland, but even there there's a good chance of survival (at least in the short-term) if you get enough tons of rock between you and the mushroom clouds.
Belgium always strikes me as one of those countries that would be more likely to split up after a big catastrophe (as opposed to the USA balkanising into the Aztlan Republic, Cascadia, etc etc
) given that a lot of them seem intent on splitting up even when everything's going pretty well.
Very intriguing the hints about surviving Germans and even more intriguing how they could have communicated with them.
We're back to trains, not so bad; after all, in many post-atomic TL it's a luxury even a horse.
My compliments for the Controller/Constable scene, it really strikes for realism by any angle you choose to see it. A little bit of curiosity for the new character. I put my 0,01 € on a """resistance""" member.
Glad you found it interesting. The trains thing, again, is some parts progress and some parts propaganda. Obviously getting any form of infrastructure up and running is a good sign but, as the Constable says, it's little more than 80-odd miles of railway with irregular, militarised service.
Great stream of consciousness sequence; so Belgians were right, there are still German citizens alive. Frankly chilling the usage of the term "huntergatherer"; somehow, somewhere, we're back to sticks and stones.
Are the "visitors" British?
I hope we will see more of this small but intense mini-chapters focusing on individuals.
Very pleased indeed that you liked that little snippet; it was nice to go out on a limb and do something slightly different. It was literally a stream-of-consciousness as well - just started hitting the keys and followed where I was going.
We'll find out who our 'visitors' are soon enough...
Small nitpick: It should be "Townsend Thoresen", but we are in P&Sverse who cares about spelling
(IIRC, even Whitelaw use erroneus words like "Russian" for "Soviet").
Finally an answer for the flash over the Hebrids, thank you!
What exactly means "fags"? Maybe cigarettes? I ask you because beside that meaning I knew that fag was a very unpolite nick for "homosexual"...
Good performance by our guys on the ship, the thugs perhaps thought to be still in the good ol' days of compassionate law enforcement by socials services.
Apalling show of force by RN; that's a damn cursory way to sedate a riot
As always, keep on Jack!
Nitpick noted; I'll go back and sort that.
The confusion between 'Russian' and 'Soviet' is a mistake on Whitelaw's part, but one that's been fairly common over the years. Certainly during the Second World War, Churchill etc. preferred the term 'Russian' (even though it ignores a whole bunch of peoples) because it smoothed over the fact that we were sided with communists; this sort of got held over during the Cold War - a lot of official documents carry on this mistake, it seems.
'Fag' is English slang for 'cigarettes', yeah.
The riot on the ship was, in fact, not the reason the Navy turned up; it had been planned all along - a quick, cheap way of getting rid of useless mouths; the fact that the prisoners were rioting merely made things messier. Still, as you say, it's very harsh stuff.
Thanks for the interest, and I promise the next update will come soon!
When it comes to Italy and probably Spain it depends on how much do surviving soldiers still want to take orders from government officials.It depends on factors like desertion in the ranks,what legitimacy do they still give to the italian state and most importantly how will they pay the troops now that money is pretty much worthless.Desertion is probably high especially among conscripts who wonder if they still have a home,even summary executions are unlikely to curb the problem.The real problem is the risk of insurrection, following the war most people would view government officials with distrust and radical ideas like violent revolution would easily grab hold.The same thing happened after the Great plague when peasant uprisings became the norm,here the situation would be different but the devastation of the war would make many governments susceptible to violent overthrow.
Mario's pretty much hit the nail on the head about the Mafia better than I could hope to; that's not to say that locally (espec. in rural areas),
mafiosi might be well armed enough to gain small scale,
de facto power, but a Mob state is unfeasible for the reasons Mr. Rossi describes; even in the small pockets the Mafia do try and get some influence, they're going to be hard pressed to keep it when what's left of the Italian Military turns up.
With regards to that, Mario and Jan have explained well; what's left of govt. can't buy loyalty with money, but they can certainly blackmail it with food/threats etc.
You're absolutely right in saying that Europe's last great apocalypse, the Great Plague, led to great upheaval and peasant revolts. In this scenario, in 1984, however, the nature of a 'peasant revolt' is somewhat different.
In the Middle Ages, weaponry was much more 'democratic'. A sword is a sword, for example - anyone can make one, anyone can use one. Therefore, any rebels could find themselves pretty much as well armed as the authorities they sought to overthrow. There wasn't even that big a discrepancy in training, given that the majority of the ruler's forces were just peasants themselves that happened to be indentured by the king (or whoever). The only real 'technological) advantage that the authorities could bring to bear was heavy cavalry, and even this wasn't too hard to deal with once you made pikes and stuff.
In the modern era, there's a much larger discrepancy in power available. It's all well and good sharpening a stick in order to stop a galloping horse; the man on the street will find it much harder to craft something that'll stop an M60 MBT, much less an Agusta gunship. Even in pure infantry terms, a modern 'peasant' will be hard pressed to match the training and the equipment (assault rifle, grenades, radio, camouflage, night vision etc etc) that the most basic soldier has. Therefore, for better or for worse, 'peasant uprisings' these days are up against some pretty bad odds.
This isn't to say that such a thing is impossible, however - one can get a long way with determination and some Kalashnikovs and molotov cocktails. This is partially being proven right now in Libya; an armed rabble, effectively, is defeating the military of the state. Note however, that this is largely down to NATO intervention levelling the playing field by turning all of Gaddafi's tanks/jets/whatever into charcoal. Before this, we can see that well-motivated rebels in pick up trucks with shotguns were no match even for a pretty second-tier air force and army.
You've raised some interesting points though, ivfl, and I'm very glad that you're taking such an interest in the timeline.
The colloquial term 'fag' for homosexual does not exist in the UK. Here is means cigarette.
Brits would use different terms of abuse, which I shall not repeat here.
'Fag' is certainly an alien term in the UK, being an Americanism, but it's still pretty common (around here, at least) due to its prevalence in US Films, Video Games, Music etc etc. Indeed, round these parts, I think it's probably surpassed home-grown slurs as the bigot's weapon of choice, but whatever. It's still used to mean cigarette (espec. in the South; up in Newcastle for example, one smokes 'tabs') as well, which leads to all sorts of tired American jokes about going to London and being appalled when someone offers them a fag.
For those who are interested, the Detective and the Deputy, now that I think about it, use a pretty varied selection of homophobic slurs against one another - all though they're doing it in good fun - which, again, for better or worse, is a pretty accurate facsimile of some conversations round here.
Wheew - speaking clocks, Mafia states, a little essay on 'democratic weapons' and then a refresher course on homophobia. Didn't expect to type all that out when I clicked reply! It's good though - great to get comments keeping me on my toes.