Proposals and War Aims That Didn't Happen Map Thread

GodoftheTranses

Etruscan-enthusiast35 said:
View attachment 442001
The East African Federation.
No idea what the internal borders would be so feel free to make as many guesses as you wish.
Click to expand...

From what I understand one of the reasons for the federation would be to allow internal subdivisions that match with the tribes of the area so as to try to increase the region's stability, I have no idea where to find information on tribal boundaries in African countries but it will probably be those
 
Crying

Crying

the 14th doctor said:
From what I understand one of the reasons for the federation would be to allow internal subdivisions that match with the tribes of the area so as to try to increase the region's stability, I have no idea where to find information on tribal boundaries in African countries but it will probably be those
Click to expand...
all-tribes.png

murdockmapbound.png

Africa_comp.jpg

HOW+DO+THE+DIFFERENCES+BETWEEN+THE+TWO+MAPS+CAUSE+A+PROBLEM.jpg


I have some doubts about the accuracy & relevancy of these maps, but this was literally just the results of some quick google searches. It shouldn't be too hard for someone to model internal borders off of these.
 
oshron

oshron

Clandango said:
I don't think it actually was implying anything about independence. Otherwise imagine the Rust Belt and Sun Belt maps we would get on here.
Click to expand...
it could easily just be seen as a version of the proposed New Afrika state since it covers pretty much that entire area
 
NorthTension

NorthTension

No one ever made a map for this afaik but:
easttn.JPG

The Civil War sentiments of East Tennessee were among the most complex of any region in the nation. Whig support ran high in East Tennessee (especially in Knox and surrounding counties) in the years leading up to the war, as many people in the region were suspicious of the aristocratic Southern planter class that dominated the Southern Democratic party and most southern state legislatures. When Tennessee voted on a referendum calling for secession in February 1861, more than 80% of East Tennesseans voted against it, including majorities in every county except Sullivan and Meigs. In June 1861, nearly 70% of East Tennesseans voted against the Ordinance of Secession (which succeeded statewide), although along with Sullivan and Meigs, there were pro-secession majorities in Monroe, Rhea, Sequatchie, and Polk counties. There were also pro-secession majorities within the cities of Knoxville and Chattanooga, although these cities' respective counties voted decisively against secession.

In June 1861, the Unionist East Tennessee Convention met in Greeneville, where it drafted a petition to the Tennessee state legislature demanding that East Tennessee be allowed to form a separate Union-aligned state split off from the rest of Tennessee (à la West Virginia).
Click to expand...
From Wikipedia
 

Pragmatic Progressive

Albidoom said:
Yes, but a slogan on the line of "Ten remote hell holes where we would allow Jews to build their own nation" won't sell those locations.
Click to expand...

The thing is: There actually are places on the list that are pleasant and livable. But I have discovered some more falsehoods there (AFAIK):

"Ample rain" in Kimberley? I thought that this area of Australia was barren desert?

"Rich jungle-like vegetation" near or in Aklavik (on the Mackenzie river)? Possibly, there is vast Taiga, but otherwise? At least "huge animal herds" is correct if you refer to caribou and/or musk oxen.
 
damein fisher

damein fisher

Banned
SaveAtlacamani said:
The thing is: There actually are places on the list that are pleasant and livable. But I have discovered some more falsehoods there (AFAIK):

"Ample rain" in Kimberley? I thought that this area of Australia was barren desert?

"Rich jungle-like vegetation" near or in Aklavik (on the Mackenzie river)? Possibly, there is vast Taiga, but otherwise? At least "huge animal herds" is correct if you refer to caribou and/or musk oxen.
Click to expand...

Yeah, as someone who lives in Canada, I cannot honestly expressed how much I found that funny
 
Albidoom

Albidoom

SaveAtlacamani said:
The thing is: There actually are places on the list that are pleasant and livable. But I have discovered some more falsehoods there (AFAIK):

"Ample rain" in Kimberley? I thought that this area of Australia was barren desert?

"Rich jungle-like vegetation" near or in Aklavik (on the Mackenzie river)? Possibly, there is vast Taiga, but otherwise? At least "huge animal herds" is correct if you refer to caribou and/or musk oxen.
Click to expand...

Well, yes, my phrasing was a bit of an overreaction in the other direction, but given how they keep describing all the goodies of those ten proposals one can't help but wonder why those areas aren't already heavily settled when they are so wonderful locations to live in?

Pic unrelated

proposalyep2.png
 
Linbot

Linbot

Albidoom said:
Well, yes, my phrasing was a bit of an overreaction in the other direction, but given how they keep describing all the goodies of those ten proposals one can't help but wonder why those areas aren't already heavily settled when they are so wonderful locations to live in?

Pic unrelated

View attachment 443150
Click to expand...
"South-East Asia"

Right. Is its capital Bangkok or something?

Also, the Middle East, Turkey, and the Balkans should probably be their own region.
 
Crying

Crying

xmoose said:
But I don´t read anything from him yet so maybe wrong...
Click to expand...
Wouldn't recommend bothering, the guy is openly a National Bolshevik (aka a literal CommuNazi). His 'theories' are, to put it mildly, not very good. They're a lot more about what he wants to happen than they are about actually trying to objectively hypothesise the future. Kind of like that George Friedman dude, who's theories about the next 100 years can be summed up as 'American political dominance forever' - which I'm sure has nothing to do with his Neocon political stance.
 
Rosa Luxemburg

Rosa Luxemburg

Banned
Crying said:
Wouldn't recommend bothering, the guy is openly a National Bolshevik (aka a literal CommuNazi). His 'theories' are, to put it mildly, not very good. They're a lot more about what he wants to happen than they are about actually trying to objectively hypothesise the future. Kind of like that George Friedman dude, who's theories about the next 100 years can be summed up as 'American political dominance forever' - which I'm sure has nothing to do with his Neocon political stance.
Click to expand...
Oh I own his book! It's interesting stuff, really. Probably way off but interesting nonetheless
 
Crazy Boris

Crazy Boris

Banned
Albidoom said:
Well, yes, my phrasing was a bit of an overreaction in the other direction, but given how they keep describing all the goodies of those ten proposals one can't help but wonder why those areas aren't already heavily settled when they are so wonderful locations to live in?

Pic unrelated

View attachment 443150
Click to expand...

Romania? Totally African.
Bahamas? Latin as hell.
Turkey? Basically the same as India.
China? More southeast Asian than a bathtub full of Pho.

Makes perfect sense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top
Top