From The Role of British Colonial Policy in the South Sudanese Civil War: A Postcolonial Conflict Analysis, by David Lin (2018):I remember reading a text saying that at one point, the British Empire considered giving the Christian/Animist-majority regions of Sudan (modern-day South Sudan) to Uganda, does anyone knows about this source?
If this happened, it would cause some interesting effects on the region, probably butterfly the Sudanese Civil War, and make Uganda much bigger, which itself comes with its own countless problems.
Officials within the British administration had not intended for the North and South to become a single state in the independent era. Instead, many within the Sudanese colonial administration intended for South Sudan to gain official emancipation from the North and join British East Africa (Kenya and Uganda). Harold MacMichael, a senior British civil secretary announced that 'the administration of the South was to be developed along ‘African’, rather than ‘Arab’ lines, and that the future of southern Sudan might ultimately lie with the countries of British East Africa, rather than with the Middle East'.
How about that. This is him, isn’t it? Just saw it on mine. I can’t imagine anyone else would want this out of the entire population, so it must be. I wish I still got more maps popping up on my front page. It’s a lot of porn all of a sudden, and for no reason, since I only use DA to subscribe to mappers.
Yep. That’s him.
I’ve been having the same issue, especially with lots of weird nude photos. Every time I see it I check the “show less like this” thing, but Deviantart doesn’t get the message because the very next day I’m assaulted with a dozen more, even though I’ve never once looked for nsfw art there, let alone real life photos like that.
to be entirely honest i just googled "library of congress eritrea map" and it popped up lolNice find!
CzechosilesoslovakoandsomeotherstuffiaCasually searched up the Czechoslovak Corridor and came out with a treasure trove of maps I've compiled into this document
Also, have Tennis Shoe Czechoslovakia (Proposed by Vavro Šrobár in 1919) as a freebie :3
View attachment 808358
Casually searched up the Czechoslovak Corridor and came out with a treasure trove of maps I've compiled into this document
Also, have Tennis Shoe Czechoslovakia (Proposed by Vavro Šrobár in 1919) as a freebie :3
View attachment 808358
Hungary is a bit more... compacted as wellnever mind Czechoslovakia, what's with Serbia apparently taking most of Austria
All I can say is that Lawrence must not've thought too much of Zeid's ability, to propose giving him Deir ez-Zor
T.E. Lawrence’s proposal for the division of the Middle East in the aftermath of WWI
Germans would feel less punished, germany would be more catholic probably more stable over all.Following the disintegration of Austria-Hungary during the final days of World War I, there were discussions that the Republic of German-Austria (comprised of the German-speaking regions of Austria and the Sudetenland) should integrate with Weimar Germany. The Allies did not favour the proposal, and as part of the Treaty of Saint-Germain, Austria was forbidden from uniting with Germany while the Sudetenland was given to Czechoslovakia. As we all know, Austria would later unite with Nazi Germany in March 1938. That same month, the Nazis would invade Czechoslovakia; the Sudetenland would be annexed by Germany, while Czechia would become a German-occupied "protectorate" and Slovakia a Nazi puppet-state.
What would have happened if German-Austria was not banned from uniting with Germany in 1919? Would this lead to less resentment towards the Allies, or would it just embolden the Nazi movement? Either way, Czechoslovakia would probably feel maligned, and this would also have consequences for Hungary, Yugoslavia, Italy, and Poland.
Considering Weimar Germany's economic and political crises during the Great Depression, and the long-standing historical rivalry between Prussia/Northern Germany and Austria -- could this lead to an Austrian secessionist movement instead? Would this secessionist movement be a Habsburg restorationist movement, or one led by the Communists of "Red Vienna" (as the Austrian government was called, between 1919-1934), or something else entirely?
If the former -- I can see Habsburg loyalists making common cause with Bavarian monarchists, who were still loyal to the House of Wittelsbach. I can also see Mussolini's Italy supporting them -- though Italy had long hated the Habsburgs, OTL Fascist Italy supported Austrian independence, and was very nervous that the German annexation of Austria would lead to Germany pressing Austrian claims on South Tyrol. IOTL, Hitler swore not to do this when he and Mussolini formed the Axis in 1937 -- but in a timeline where that agreement was never reached, I can see Mussolini trying to support Austrian secessionist to create a conservative Catholic buffer-state in his sphere of influence, to undermine further pan-Germanist aspirations.
Alternatively, if Austria becomes a hotbed of Leftist radicals, I can see "Red Vienna" Marxists making common cause with the Bavarian Soviet Republic and eventually the Spartakus League. Either way -- I can see Austria and Bavaria forming a bloc against the government in Berlin.
Of course, Austria and Bavaria were both also hotbeds of Nazi activity -- in part because of the backlash to the Treaty of Saint-Germain (in Austria's case), and Bavarian Marxist uprisings (in Bavaria's case). So, it could be that Austria's presence only strengthens the Nazi movement in Germany, if Austro-separatism/Habsburg monarchism fail to take hold and Leftist movements are still suppressed.
Former seems more likely to me.Considering Weimar Germany's economic and political crises during the Great Depression, and the long-standing historical rivalry between Prussia/Northern Germany and Austria -- could this lead to an Austrian secessionist movement instead? Would this secessionist movement be a Habsburg restorationist movement, or one led by the Communists of "Red Vienna" (as the Austrian government was called, between 1919-1934), or something else entirely?
While, like the Partition in general, splitting Bangladesh caused a great deal of avoidable pain (atop being solid AH fodder)... I do not see the Hindutva sorts claiming this either going 'Good Riddance' or welcoming East bengal back into the fold.Map of Greater Bangladesh, a conspiracy theory floated around in contemporary Indian ultranationalistic circles which claims that modern Bangladesh not only wishes to annex West Bengal in hopes of creating a United Bengal, but also the Seven Sister States due to them having sizable Bengali populations.