POD 1967. This has important repercussions, in particular relating to Section 28.
Oct 7, 2009 #1 RogueBeaver POD 1967. This has important repercussions, in particular relating to Section 28.
Oct 7, 2009 #2 Dathi THorfinnsson RogueBeaver said: POD 1967. This has important repercussions, in particular relating to Section 28. Click to expand... PM of ??? (google. Apparently Great Britain) Section 28 (didn't bother googling) ????
RogueBeaver said: POD 1967. This has important repercussions, in particular relating to Section 28. Click to expand... PM of ??? (google. Apparently Great Britain) Section 28 (didn't bother googling) ????