IMO it doesn’t take an ASB effort for the British to colonise Patagonia and the northern regions of what is today Argentina starting in 1809. Some argue that they couldn’t realistically populate it, I’d argue they easily could (without impacting migration to SA, AUS and NZ) by handling the Irish famine better, diverting some migration away from the US, maintaining high early 19th century birth rates or even pushing for a higher degree of migration. The Brits could even recruit some of their most easily assimalable Saxons from Hanover and other regions of Germany.
Other than this, Dutch East Indies which was mentioned before nearly happened during the Napoleonic wars , it’d be interesting if Britain aligned with a southern chinese uprising or at least form some sort of friendlier relationship with the Chinese, which could lead to a higher than our TL chinese migration to a united Malay/Dutch East indies colony which obviously includes Singapore. Mixed with a more substantial Indian migration to this East Indies colony along with a reasonable British infrastructure policy and governing framework, you might see a Singapore on steroids which could lead to some pretty interesting ATLs
Other than this, Dutch East Indies which was mentioned before nearly happened during the Napoleonic wars , it’d be interesting if Britain aligned with a southern chinese uprising or at least form some sort of friendlier relationship with the Chinese, which could lead to a higher than our TL chinese migration to a united Malay/Dutch East indies colony which obviously includes Singapore. Mixed with a more substantial Indian migration to this East Indies colony along with a reasonable British infrastructure policy and governing framework, you might see a Singapore on steroids which could lead to some pretty interesting ATLs
Last edited: