Giggle.Yes, I think you've hit the nail on the head as far as the biggest obstacle. A functioning parliamentary system needs and requires only ONE
Since of course Britain doesn't have a bicameral system at all.
Giggle.Yes, I think you've hit the nail on the head as far as the biggest obstacle. A functioning parliamentary system needs and requires only ONE
Giggle.
Since of course Britain doesn't have a bicameral system at all.
Granted, that doesn’t mean the US still cannot have a parliamentary system. It’d just be semi-presidential one with various differences added.
We don’t have much of a system of checks and balances given how the Supreme Court is not as balanced as everyone likes to make it out to be.
We don’t need to have a first past the post system or such there.
Yes, I think you've hit the nail on the head as far as the biggest obstacle. A functioning parliamentary system needs and requires only ONE legislative body.
There are many types of checks. For example, separate separate university system which gives push-back to the government, a separate hospital system, etc.The US system has a lot more checks and balances than the UK.