after a given nuclear conflict, the historical context of wich is now irelevant, given that it is of a magnitute by wich it afects all of the world population, and that of the pre war population enough survive 10 years after the war to alow "normal" demografic population increase, or in other words that, althou the population is at say... 10-20% of the pre war level the demografics are still healthy, how large a percentage of the post war generation would be afected by damaged genetics to the point of disability, how would this evolve with time, and what are the actuall factors involved, wich are the most damaging, exposure during and imediatly after the attacks, or later exposure to falout and intake of contamination from the enwiroment?
wich tipes of radiation are the most dangerous in the longterm, concerning inherent genetic damage?
i know most people wont know much about this, maybe theres someone who knows these things for some reason
i just wached mad max again and cant help but wonder, wouldnt half of those people look like chernobil and depleted uranium victimes
i heard stories about areas in former sssr where rural populations live in areas of extreemly high contamination levels, and basically live shorter, have a higher cancer rate, but go on living, as in no spectacular change has ocured
wich tipes of radiation are the most dangerous in the longterm, concerning inherent genetic damage?
i know most people wont know much about this, maybe theres someone who knows these things for some reason
i just wached mad max again and cant help but wonder, wouldnt half of those people look like chernobil and depleted uranium victimes
i heard stories about areas in former sssr where rural populations live in areas of extreemly high contamination levels, and basically live shorter, have a higher cancer rate, but go on living, as in no spectacular change has ocured