Bulgaria would also join, just about all of the Balkans would join if it meant more landKing Carol I of Romania wanted to join the Central Powers.
Needs a pre-1900 PoD but you could get the US as part of them as well.
Bulgaria would also join, just about all of the Balkans would join if it meant more land
It would be helpful, but why would the U.S. join?
It would be helpful, but why would the U.S. join?
Needs a pre-1900 PoD but you could get the US as part of them as well.
The US is not joining the Central Powers. The British were stopping our ships but they were not killing anyone. There were no democracies in the Central Powers.
Well I geuss they could be neutralGreece, not really. At least one and probably both of its rivals will be in the CP before them, so they have nothing to gain. The only real choices are neutral or Entente Greece.
King Carol of Romania knew that his nation would not approve of joining the CP and that the best he could hope for was neutrality as long as the Entente has a decent chance. Romania might join the CP only if and when the Russian Empire starts breaking down.
Albania might join if Prince William somehow manages to not only stay in power but pacify his numerous opposition. Hard to imagine how that could happen, though.
Has Italy be mentioned or is the 'Italy as a Central Power' cliche debunked as impossible or unlikely?
More pro-German anti-British feeling could reverse the roles that lead the US into the war. American ships are intercepted or sunk by the British navy trying to reach German ports and the build up of British soldiers in Canada leads to increased tensions. I think you'd need the English to do something stupid to really anger the Americans but it's not impossible.
The US was largely on the fence about the war at the start. Britain was a better trade partner but the US had a huge German and Irish population who weren't particularly fond of England.
Also a central powers USA leads to some interesting shifts in theater. I'd expect to see decent sized battles in the far east and Caribbean.
Japan considered it. Largely, the pro-German side was out of power at the time, but was heavily the genro and the old Army hands; the pro-British side was stocked with the more pro-democracy sorts and to a lesser extent the Navy. Were the sides swapped, several prominent Japanese statesmen had advocated joining the German side because they were convinced of a swift German victory; there had been diplomatic feelers to weigh changing to the German side since at least 1912.
More pro-German anti-British feeling could reverse the roles that lead the US into the war. American ships are intercepted or sunk by the British navy trying to reach German ports and the build up of British soldiers in Canada leads to increased tensions. I think you'd need the English to do something stupid to really anger the Americans but it's not impossible.
The US was largely on the fence about the war at the start. Britain was a better trade partner but the US had a huge German and Irish population who weren't particularly fond of England.
Also a central powers USA leads to some interesting shifts in theater. I'd expect to see decent sized battles in the far east and Caribbean.
The US is not joining the Central Powers. The British were stopping our ships but they were not killing anyone. There were no democracies in the Central Powers.
But the possibility of a incident resulting in a sunken ship coupled with Anglophobes(eg Hearst) in positions of some power could do it.