Population of Ireland without emigration

Does anyone know of any projections of the size of the Irish population (Republic, North, or the whole island) without the incredibly high emigration rates it historically sustained?
 
I remember seeing this asked awhile ago, IIRC without the near insanely high levels of emmigration the whole of Ireland would have a population of somewhere between 20-25 million.
 
Last edited:
I remember seeing this asked awhile ago, IIRC without the near insanely high levels of emmigration Ireland (the whole Island) would have a population of somewhere between 20-25 million.

Surely Ireland doesn't have the resources to support such a high population, though?
 
Surely Ireland doesn't have the resources to support such a high population, though?

That was part of the reason they emmigrated.

However, lack of resources does'nt necessarily mean you're population is limited, I mean look at Japan, it's not exactly resource rich and it has 125 million people.
 
Ireland was extremely overpopulated for its time and political/economic situation. It is the only country in the world that has a smaller population today than it did in 1845.
 
Wow, I was hoping for an upper limit. Looks like that upper limit is pretty arbitrary. That's insane. Irish people must have had kids like crazy.
 

Thande

Donor
Irish people must have had kids like crazy.

Well...yes, that's the major stereotype of (Catholic) Irish.

As said above, though, the problem is that Ireland can't support that many people. Call it an upper limit of maybe 10 million, barring huge food imports.
 
however, in an industrialized nation like it currently is, i think 20 million is not a stretch. i mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but Greater London in 10 million. surely the entire island could hold more than that with modern technology and means

and there are over 40 million irish in america, you can bet we have babies like it's our job
 
however, in an industrialized nation like it currently is, i think 20 million is not a stretch. i mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but Greater London in 10 million. surely the entire island could hold more than that with modern technology and means

I'm definitely not questioning that. What I'm trying to figure out now is how I can have agricultural technology advance in step with natural population growth. Let's handwave the potato blight, or say that the British somehow decide to import food to prevent starvation. Then we have...what? Widespread introduction of mechanization, chemical fertilizers, maybe intensive breeding programs to increase yield. Does Ireland need artificial irrigation? I doubt it, but I don't know.

Introduction of greenhouses? Are Irish winters cold?
 

Laurentia

Banned
however, in an industrialized nation like it currently is, i think 20 million is not a stretch. i mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but Greater London in 10 million. surely the entire island could hold more than that with modern technology and means

and there are over 40 million irish in america, you can bet we have babies like it's our job

You have to remember, Britain is a larger island, and it imports around half of it's food, as I'm sure Thande could tell you.
 
You have to remember, Britain is a larger island, and it imports around half of it's food, as I'm sure Thande could tell you.


And it is not just the size that counts - its the quality. Ireland is no Ukraine or Iowa when it comes to soil quality.

But I would say that Ireland could definitely support more population, with food imports. 20 million seems a little high, probably around 15 million sounds a little better to me.
 
Yes, we Irish Americans do breed like rabbits. I have 5 aunts and uncles and 6 first cousins on my mother's side alone. I probably have 30-40 cousins total, and that is a fairly meager amount compared some irish Americans!
Scipio
 
Ireland could have supported its population if it wasn't for the land that was under cultivation or pasture for export to Britain.
 

Thande

Donor
You have to remember, Britain is a larger island, and it imports around half of it's food, as I'm sure Thande could tell you.

That's not actually true anymore--or it may be, but that half represents luxury. Britain would actually be a net food exporter if we restrict ourselves to crops that can be grown in the island. This is due to agricultural scientific development by the post-war governments out of paranoia that we'd end up in a blockaded, rationing situation again.

Also, I question the idea that modern Ireland is "industrialised". The Republic basically went straight from agricultural to post-industrial (the Celtic Tiger economy is largely based on tertiary industry) without ever going through the usual intermediate industrial phase.
 
I'm only 25% Irish, yet I have 5 Grand Uncles who are Irish-American, 12 Great Grand Uncles and Aunts (Each with 5-6 kids each, and 5-6 kids each as well between 1900-1985). I have around 100-150 family members I see at parties, and this is only 25% of my family.

My Italian side is small however. My Grandmother, a cousin of my Mom, and another cousin, outside of my Mother, Father, Aunt, and 1st Cousin (And my brother).
 
Ireland isn't really well-suited to high-efficiency agriculture. Too wet for wheat, too cold for rice, not sunny enough for maize. (Generally speaking, of course.)
 
Just adding to the whole Irish breed like rabbits thing both of my parents are the youngest of 8 siblings, and their parents had even larger families.
 
Surely Ireland doesn't have the resources to support such a high population, though?

Singapore has almost the same population in something like 1% of the land area. It isn't what you've got that counts, it's what you do with it - if Ireland could develop sufficiently so as to be able to pay for the imports it needs then it would have no trouble supporting a much higher population. such a level of development would probably require a pre-1840 POD though.
 
Top