Is Sony to lose, i think MS moves are too little to late but two things..this will be a long generation, and this might be the last conventional generation for videogames, if MS is able overcome his fault..well expect XBSX2 for 2027, if not...buy Xcloud please,
.No money for thisIs Sony to lose, i think MS moves are too little to late but two things..this will be a long generation, and this might be the last conventional generation for videogames, if MS is able overcome his fault..well expect XBSX2 for 2027, if not...buy Xcloud please,
The problem with MS in recent years is essentially the XBone bought nothing to the party PS4 didn't have. The latter was cheaper and (in a reverse of the previous generation) it was MS's turn to do boneheaded things. They still might have turned it around but then WiiU turned out to be essentially a beta model and Nintendo shrunk the components to create the Switch. That was both cheaper (again) and due to actually being cheapish to make launched at a price both acceptable and sustainable (rather than the constant XB price cuts). But the big problem remains limited exclusives and the fact you can barely put a knife between the two consoles specs. If they can get better games, fix the marketing and avoid acts of stupid they might pull it around. Also its a "games" console guys, streaming is secondary now smart TV's (or at least Chromecast and fire sticks) are common and cheap. Sony and Nintendo recognised this and won MS not so much and it showed.
Sega already have years on the industry, the sentence should be the Start of Sega Struggles as they started to have a bad time.
don't think yamauchi would sell, but if they need the partnership to be more equal, both created a new videogame company and both put all cards on the table, not playing the other, both take the risk and profits equally. Might cause some early headbutts but later on would created good synergy as the company is outside either whim and genuine cooperation is needed
Of course, another idea I had for it to work out was to have Nintendo and Sony split profits on the consoles themselves, then have the profits from the games depend on which one of them published it.
This question is both out of nowhere and reminds me of an amusing little aside from a Super Best Friends episode about the idea of instead of selling off an IP, companies sell off individual characters. It was one of the Friday Night Fisticuffs episodes, I wanna say SVC Chaos, but that might be wrong. I know it was a Capcom/SNK crossover episode though. Could make for a decent forum game.
who?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rise_of_the_Guardians#Possible_sequels HE IS A PUBLIC DOMAIN CHARACTHER anyway
The Avengers Comic books might be a bit better. Many people think Bendis ruined some of the Avengers comic book lines in Marvel.
Given he succeeded Chuck Austin they were already pretty ruined in the first place and the book had been drifting since the end of Busiek's run. That said he plumbed alot of new depths, ruined the X-Men in the process and for all most of it was editorially mandated he still made even more mess than he had to. Pretty much the story of Marvel from about 2004 right up the present day...
