I had a fun little idea for any musical fans out here: what if 'Chicago' and 'A Chorus Line' switched fates?
During the 30th Tony Awards, 'Chicago' wins Best Musical... and sweeps a bunch of other categories. Basically, the inverse of what happened IOTL:
Chicago during the 1976 Tony Awards:
A Chorus Line:
Nearly a decade later in 1985, instead of
A Chorus Line being adapted into the big screen,
Chicago gets that treatment instead, with Michael Douglas starring as lawyer Billy Flynn, and the Velma and Roxie roles given to unknown actresses. The reviews come in, and they are equally as negative as the ones that the
A Chorus Line 1985 movie received IOTL:
The New York Times (30/100): "
Chicago is less a movie than an expensive souvenir program".
The 1975 Broadway production of
Chicago, however, gets great reviews and boosts Chita Rivera's and Gwen Verdon's careers to great heights. The Broadway production has over 6,000 performances and goes through a revival in 2006. No more movies are made.
A Chorus Line, on the other hand, runs on Broadway until the end of the 70s. It then goes through an astronomical revival in 1996, sweeping the 1997 Tony Awards. It becomes a global production, opening in London, Australia, and many other countries.
In 2002,
A Chorus Line finally makes it to the silver screen. The film stars Richard Gere in the role of play director Zach, and Catherine Zeta-Jones as Cassie. Critics love it, and it's the smash box office hit of 2003:
This felt almost sacrilegious to write given how good the 2002 Chicago movie is, and how it probably makes for a better movie than A Chorus Line ever did. But anyway, a random idea that I feel wouldn't be out of place in the
Fringe alternate universe!