Pop Culture - The Extended Adventures of Peter Cushing's Doctor Who

Welcome. In our timeline, Peter Cushing is an interesting footnote in the history of Doctor Who. He was the star of two movies - Doctor Who and the Daleks, and Daleks Invasion Earth 2150, for AARU/Amicus Productions. He was also the first radio/audio Doctor Who. For another company, Stanmark, he voiced the Doctor in Journey Into Time, a half hour pilot proposed for a radio drama series, a pilot now lost to us, which, ironically, would be the first Doctor Who production to vanish into the mists and be lost to us.

This Timeline is going to explore the history of Cushing, of Amicus and Stanmark, and show us a different Doctor Who, and a new set of adventures, parallel to the television series. It's part of a trilogy of small timelines about Alternate Doctor's, including Nelvana's animated Doctor Who, and Burton's lost 1990's who series.

I hope that you enjoy the ride...
 
Interesting choice.

I wonder which of his OTL roles will get butterflied. I'd say that he probably won't have time to appear as Sherlock Holmes in the 1968 BBC series, which sounds like it would be a relief to him as he doesn't seem to have enjoyed it much.

Cheers,
Nigel.
 
Interesting choice.

I wonder which of his OTL roles will get butterflied. I'd say that he probably won't have time to appear as Sherlock Holmes in the 1968 BBC series, which sounds like it would be a relief to him as he doesn't seem to have enjoyed it much.

Cheers,
Nigel.

Also missing also in some iconic Hammer Movie productions

i wonder if further Rolle as Doctor Who will have impact on Peter Cushing later career
like for Star Wars as Obi Wan Kenobi instead of Grand Moff Talkin ?
 
According to Wikipedia they planned on making a third film based on The Chase. However the idea fell through after Daleks - Invasion Earth 2150 AD underperformed at the box office.

There's a fan made trailer for it on you tube somewhere.
 
They did try and market the movies in America. Somewhere I have a copy of the novelization of one of them. They even brought a Dalek over. (Hilarious in Hindsight bit: He visited the Empire State Building. Simply hilarious bit: He referred to a siren as his mating call...)

One also wonders how this will affect the career of another noted Who actor, and one of the few connections between official Who and the movies- Bernard Cribbins.
 
The Story Begins....

Doctor Who aired on television in 1963, and would go on to become a classic British program. But in 1965, with Peter Cushing, the Doctor would go on to have a second career in movies and radio that would span a decade, six movies, a stage play and three seasons of radio serials in foreign locations, and come very close to a spin off American television series.

The story begins with Joe Vegoda. Born in 1910, Joe Vegoda had found work in the British film and television industry. In his early fifties, he’d moved into a producer role, acting as an uncredited producer or executive producer for What a Whopper, Fury at Smuggler’s Bay and Live Now, Pay Later. He set up his own company, Regal International pictures.

It was Joe Vegoda who had the brainstorm of making a Doctor Who movie from the serials. Back in those days, television programs were aired once, and broadcast on relatively poor resolution, small screen, black and white televisions.

Television was a brand new medium, and the rules were still being developed. There was no such thing as reruns or syndication in British television back then. Rather, a lot of British television was live, or shot so close to live as hardly made a difference. When you wanted to edit videotape, you actually had to cut and splice it by hand with scissors and glue. The background of British Television came not from movies, but from a centuries old and well developed theatre tradition, and that tradition was, once you finished a run, it was finished. No coming back, no replays, no reruns. Even if you wanted to replay or rerun a serial, how would you deal with the actors rights? Would you pay them again, full rates? No one knew. It was this attitude that would result in so many of the old Doctor Who serials, and so much else being junked in the 1970's.

So if a British program or serial was a ratings hit, well, too bad. That broadcast was a one time only thing. It was never going to be aired again.

But that also opened a door. There was opportunity to remount the story again for the theatre on the movie screen, with a bigger budget and more impressive production values. Given the tiny budgets, and the limitations of television generally, it was pretty much a requirement to do it bigger and more impressive. The original broadcast on a low resolution twelve inch black and white screen with crackling sound. The remake would show up in high fidelity, on a 20 foot or better screen, in full colour, with camera quality resolution. You had to do it bigger and better, there was no other choice. And you also had to adapt for the shorter self contained stories of the movie theatre format.

The 1950's and early 60's, had seen this done with the two Quatermass movies, with Canadian Brian Donleavy replacing Andrew Keir in the Quatermass Xperiment and Quatermass II. 1984 had also been remounted as a movie, following a successful television run, although Peter Cushing, who had starred in the TV broadcast found himself replaced.

So in late 1964, Vegoda approached the BBC, intent on remaking Doctor Who as a theatrical feature, or more accurately, remaking the Dalek serial as a feature.

The BBC turned out to be receptive, and why not? The Daleks were a hit. Doctor Who and the Daleks had already been separately licensed to two different comic books. Toy manufacturers were buying the right to Dalek toys.

So why not a movie, to be made from a serial that had already aired and would never air again? It certainly could do nothing but help the continuing show.

The problem was that the production was too big for Vegoda alone. Regal International Films might be nice on a letterhead, but it was essentially Joe Vegoda in an office.

He didn’t have a lot of independent history, and he didn’t have access to financing, and a Doctor Who film was going to be expensive. Even a comparatively small production was going to cost at least a few hundred thousand dollars.

He needed to bring in partners....
 

Postscript: All of this is OTL as far as it goes. There’s not a lot of information out there on Joe Vegoda, so I’m employing a certain amount of guesswork. While the first two Doctor Who movies were being made, he appears to have folded up his company and moved over to British Lion, a distribution company.
 
 
Enter Amicus...

Amicus Films, in one guise or another, between 1960 and 1975, produced over thirty movies before its final dissolution. One of England’s leading independent producers, it was best known for its horror anthologies, making it Hammer Film’s biggest rival.

Among their titles were Dr. Terror’s House of Horrors, the Skull, the Beast Must Die, The House That Dripped Blood, the Deadly Bees, the Terrornauts, Asylum, Tales from the Crypt, The Land That Time Forgot, At The Earth’s Core, the People that Time Forgot and so forth.

Oddly enough, this quintessential British institution was actually the work of two New York jews, Max Rosenberg and Milton Subotsky.

Subotsky in the 1950's was an earnest young scriptwriter. In 1956, he submitted a script to Hammer studios titled Frankenstein and the Monster, and never quite forgave them for turning him down.

Rosenberg was the son of a furrier. After graduating law school, Rosenberg got into the film business in 1939, distributing foreign films in America. In 1954, he hooked up with Milton Subotsky and the two of them became producers.

Together they produced a handful of forgettable teen flicks, such as ‘Rock, Rock, Rock’ and ‘Jamboree.’ This was the era of the baby boom, and the American teenager, as a phenomen, was a recent invention.

For the first time, you had a large population of mostly urban teens, who were not getting put straight into adulthood. Instead, they drove cars, went to dances, suffered through high school, and partied. It was the golden age of rock and roll. And that meant that teenager oriented rock movies were the natural target of a pair of want to be producers, trying to bite off a piece of the youth market.

But the real money proved to be importing British horror films. These were movies that were accessible, or could be accessible to an American audience, particularly to the audience of youth and teenagers who were the primary consumers of horror movies. British movies were shot in English, their locations and situations were recognizeable to Americans, and most importantly, they could be made cheaply. The cost of production in England was a fraction of what it was in America.

In 1954, Rosenberg obtained the rights to Hammer’s Curse of Frankenstein, for half a million dollars and made seven million in tickets. That was the breakthrough moment. For Subotsky it was a sort of personal insult, Hammer had turned down his Frankenstein script... and then made their own.

In 1960, Milton Subotsky moved to England. Still working with Rosenberg, under the name of Vulcan productions, they made City of Death, a fairly traditional gothic horror starring Christopher Lee. A few years later, they formalized their relationship under the banner of Amicus Productions.

Their first real production as Amicus was ‘Doctor Terror’s House of Horrors’, the film which would put them on the map, and set the model for many of their future productions.

Doctor Terror’s House of Horrors - There’s no house involved. Instead, five men enter a train car where they encounter Peter Cushing as the titular Doctor Terror, aka Shreck. To while away the time, he produces a tarot deck and tells each of them the story of their fate...

In the first story, we hear of an ancestral curse, a gothic house in the Scottish highlands, and a werewolf bent on revenge. The next story is a sci fi tale of a vine that grows in a garden and turns out to be bent on homicide. In Voodoo, Roy Castle, a Jazz musician, gets into trouble when he steals a west indies tune. Christopher Lee stars with Michael Gough in a story about a severed hand. Finally, Donald Sutherland gets mixed up with Vampires.

At the end, Doctor Terror tells the men that the only way to avoid these fates is to die first. It turns out to be unnecessary advice, as there has been a train wreck, and they’re all already dead. Doctor Terror turns out to be death.

There’s a corny quality to these stories, a very EC Comics vibe, each story ends with an ironic twist. The stories hit all the traditional bases - there’s a vampire, a werewolf, voodoo sorcery, a vengeful disembodied hand, and even a sci fi.

Consider the marquee - you had Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee, Donald Sutherland, Michael Gough and a host of recognizable names.
Behind the scenes, Milton Subotsky wrote the script, Rosenberg produced, and Freddie Frances directed. Joe Vegoda took an uncredited role helping the production along as an uncredited Executive Producer.

This was very much Milton Subotsky, for all his desire to be a screenwriter, Subotsky’s sensibility had formed on the pulp sci fi and EC comics of the 1940's and 1950's. He liked Frankenstein and Dracula and all that, he liked family friendly horror, and he had little taste for the harder edged, sex, gore and shock that would come to define the genre as the years wore on. His writing style and choice of subjects was already old fashioned in his heyday, and as the 70's wore on, he drifted further out of touch.

Made for the paltry sum of 105,000 pounds, it was shot in May through July, 1964, and released in February, 1965. It would go on to make its money back several times over, inspiring Subotsky and Rosenberg to visit that well again and again.

More importantly, it established Amicus, and the Subotsky/Rosenberg team as people who could put a serious project together, who could find the money, book the talent, and get the production going. Peter Cushing and Roy Castle, would, of course, transition directly into Doctor Who.
Doctor Terror was a portmanteau film - essentially an anthology of short films, loosely based around an idea or character. The big advantage of the portmanteau was that it was cheap. You could get big stars like Peter Cushing or Christopher Lee, without having to pay the full rate. Donald Sutherland, for instance, an internationally respected actor, was paid a mere thousand pounds. Instead, you hired them on for a couple of days shooting for one of the stories, and then plastered their names on the Marquee.

Shooting as a series of self contained short films simplified problems every which way and contained costs. You didn’t need to commit to extensive locations, productions. You basically got a small cast and crew together, knocked a short story off, and proceeded to the next. You could make it very cheaply, and with a series of headline names, you could sell it easily. In terms of audience satisfiction, you weren’t putting all your eggs in one basket. For the audience, well, if one of the stories didn’t work, they’d simply go on to the next one. There was something for every taste and inclination.

After a few years delay, more portmanteau horror films followed: Torture Garden (1967), The House That Dripped Blood (1971), Tales From the Crypt (1972), Asylum (1972), The Vault of Horror (1973), From Beyond the Grave (1974).

Oddly enough, Amicus didn’t proceed immediately to the genre - having made Doctor Terror, their next step was to go with Doctor Who and Sci Fi films, and even more conventional single subject horror movies. It was as if, as they went along, they seemed to lose some confidence, their particular style of horror was going slowly out of fashion, and instead of changing, they tried to return to and cling to their earliest success.
Along the way, they produced horror films, from low budget potboilers like the Deadly Bees, to high concept art-horror like I, Madman, there were gothic stories like the Skull and Now the Screaming Starts, and even a new wave horror, Scream and Scream Again. They established Cinerama Releasing in 1966, and were involved in the distribution They dabbled with science fiction in the Terrornauts, had a late swerve into adventure with At the Earth’s Core and Land that Time Forgot, they even went upscale for a time in the early 70's.

For all of its output, and we’re talking over thirty films in a fifteen year span, Amicus was a modest affair. It was literally a small office, rented for Milton Subotsky, on the Shepperton film lot, stacked with paperbacks, comic books, scripts, correspondence, and posters, where Subotsky worked with only a secretary. In New York, Rosenberg helped to arrange business.
It was literally ahead of its time, a virtual film studio that existed as a small office, two partners on opposite sides of the ocean, and as a web of deals, contracts, arrangements and relationships. Physically, Amicus barely existed. But it got movies made.

Although the temptation was to see Subotsky as the creative side, and Rosenberg as the business side, and although that was mostly true, it was a bit more complex. The two men argued and bickered frequently, and their roles sometimes blurred. Subotsky sometimes put together deals, Rosenberg sometimes put together films.

Doctor Terror was fundamental for Doctor Who. Ironically, it hadn't even hit the theatres when Joe Vegoda in 1964 approached the BBC to license Doctor Who.

But what there was, was a fully fledged film, well on its way to the theatres, and it was a project that Joe Vegoda had worked closely with both Subotsky and Rosenberg. So when he needed partners, they were only too happy to oblige.

They chose the name AARU together, as a joint venture of Amicus and Regal. I'm not sure what AARU represents, but I'm assuming it's an acronym of some sort.

Negotiations proceeded and by December of 1964, AARU Productions had negotiated a license with Terry Nation and the BBC for a Doctor Who and the Daleks, movie, with an option for two more films.

Doctor Who was on its way to the theatres.... All they needed was a star, a budget, a studio... and some Daleks.


[Note] The description of Amicus as a virtual production house is essentially accurate. It really did come down to one relatively tiny office, and two partners on opposite sides of the ocean. The history of Amicus, it's career in films, and in particular, Milton Subotsky's sensibilities is accurate. The description of Doctor Terror is also accurate.

[Note #2] Sources seem confused as to the origin of AARU. A couple of sources suggest that this was Joe Vegoda’s production company, but that was clearly Regal International Pictures. My best interpretation is that AARU was an acronym representing the partnership of Vegoda, Subotsky and Rosenberg. AARU was only ever used for the Doctor Who films.

[Note #3] There is some controversy here. Some sources have the AARU deal as allowing for only one option on a second movie, not two more. This makes a certain amount of sense, as at the time of the negotiation, there had only been two Dalek serials. The tendency back then was to negotiate for the stories. However, it should be noted that during the 1960's, a third Dalek movie was actively discussed... at least until the returns on the second came in.

Milton Subotsky appears to have believed that he retained the option for a third movie, or at least that he felt somewhat confident that he could obtain it. In an interview in Kevin Jon Daley's documentary, Dalekmania, Subotsky speaks protectively of the Daleks, as if he still retained some control. As late as 1984 he appears to have approached the BBC for license for a Doctor Who script, 'The Lossiemouth Affair,' and by 1990 he, appeared to be pitching looking for financing for the third film ‘Doctor Who’s Greatest Adventure.'

Not much is known of these later projects. Michael Sheard was attached to one. Apparently Greatest Adventure would involve a giant monster. And apparently he wanted to recruit either Tom Baker or Jon Pertwee. It's mostly rumour.

This is a little peculiar, since Amicus had broken up by the late 70's, and Subotsky on his own didn't have that much of a career. He was involved in a few films that came and went, and that was it. It's unlikely that he would have gotten anywhere. His scripts and proposals are now lost.

For purposes of this Timeline, I am assuming that the arrangement was for one movie, with options for two more, for the Daleks and Doctor Who. Or alternatively, that there was an informal commitment to the third by the BBC, that amounted to a de facto option.
 


 
 
Last edited:
Off to an excellent start here.

Negotiations proceeded and by December of 1964, AARU Productions had negotiated a license with Terry Nation and the BBC for a Doctor Who and the Daleks, movie, with an option for two more films.

[Note #3] There is some controversy here. Some sources have the AARU deal as allowing for only one option on a second movie, not two more. This makes a certain amount of sense, as at the time of the negotiation, there had only been two Dalek serials.

The second Dalek serial was broadcast from 21-Nov-1964 to 26-Dec-1964. So at the time of the negotiation the second serial was still in progress. I don't know what effect this might have had on the negotiations, but maybe the iconic scene of the Daleks crossing Westminster Bridge might have encouraged the negotiators to option multiple movies.

Taking a look at the appearance of Daleks in Newspaper cartoons in 1964, it looks like the fourth episode (broadcast 12-Dec) caused a particular reaction with 5 cartoons appearing in the following week. These include not only the famous "Degaullek" but also cartoons by Jak and Giles, who were two of the big newspaper cartoonists of the Sixties. Interestingly three of the cartoons feature Dalek Costumes - that was obviously the hot present in Christmas 1964.


Cheers,
Nigel.
 
Interesting choice.

I wonder which of his OTL roles will get butterflied. I'd say that he probably won't have time to appear as Sherlock Holmes in the 1968 BBC series, which sounds like it would be a relief to him as he doesn't seem to have enjoyed it much.

Cheers,
Nigel.

Maybe Patrick Troughton will get the part!
 
The Making of Doctor Who and the Daleks

It fell to Vegoda, Rosenberg and Subotsky to make a Doctor Who movie. Principal photography was scheduled for six weeks in April, 1965, a mere four months after the ink was signed on the license deal. Which left the completion of principal photography sometime in July, and the post-production to follow up. This was for a release date of August, 1965. In modern terms, we're used to seeing movies take a year or even years in production. This scattering of months seems like a breakneck pace.

That pace left very little time for pre-production, including writing the script, casting, set design and construction, dalek builds and budgets. Gordon Fleming came in as Director, he had worked with Subotsky in 1963. Malcolm Lockyer did the musical score.

Ironically, William Hartnell would not be available for the film role. During the period the original movie was in production, Hartnell was engaged in a grinding schedule for the Space Museum and the Chase. Back in those days, Doctor Who averaged between 40 and 45 episodes per year, and each episode could take as much as ten days. Hartnell was pretty much working year round. In order to take a vacation, they would literally have to write him out of an episode.

In any event, AARU was looking for international marketability - they needed a star with recognition in the United States and Europe. That wasn’t Hartnell. The obvious choice was Peter Cushing, who had just starred in Doctor Terror, famous for his work as Van Helsing and Doctor Frankenstein in the Hammer films, he had the international bankability they were looking for. Cushing’s Doctor would have two central traits - he had to be a brilliant inventor, after all, he’d built a time machine in his back yard, but he also had to be a grandfather, so he had to be played as an older man, more grandfatherly than leading man or action hero.

Of course, at this time, the cumulative personality, arrogant, brilliant, mercurial, witty, passionate, of the Doctor hadn't emerged. That would really only come into its own with Troughton. All of it would come later. As it was, there was only Hartnell, and Hartnell had barely a year under his belt, the character was barely evolving. So Cushing and Subotsky can hardly be faulted for their own spin.

Also coming over from Doctor Terror was Roy Castle, a song and dance man, who would take over the part of Ian. Subotsky was strongly cognizant of the importance of the youth market. His earliest films were rock and roll, for teenagers. Ian and Barbara would no longer be a pair of fusty old school teachers, but rather, young adults for audience identification. No longer a schoolteacher, Barbara, played by Jenny Linden, became the Doctor’s older grandaughter, and Ian became her boyfriend.

Meanwhile, the television teenager, Susan, would be played even younger by the precocious child actress, Roberta Tovey, again, to appeal to the pre-teen audience demographic. That pretty much drove the scripting and casting process, they only had the one ‘name’ star, the other choices were based on audience demographics. This was hardly unreasonable.

Ironically, as it turned out, this left a hole in the script. There was no place for the classical ‘leading man.' Without a central adult protagonist, the movie tended to devolve toward's a 'boy's own adventure.' Enthusiastic, but superficial. This was in tune, however, with Subotsky's pulp sci fi/EC comics sensibility.

For the most part, the script, by Milton Subotsky and David Whittaker amounted to a compressed, but faithful version of the serial. There was some debate as to whether Whittaker or Subotsky really wrote the script, or the degree of collaboration. Whittaker at that time was the story editor for the BBC series, and had supervised Terry Nation’s scripts.

It was pretty straight on, there was little in the way of rearrangement. Ian’s part was reduced, and he became more of a comic foil, given to pratfalls. Susan’s part increased, and her character became braver and more resourceful. Details changed, but it was pretty much a straightforward edit. That was probably a good thing, since Terry Nation’s script tended to be slow moving and draggy, in order to stretch across six expisodes. In contrast, the movie was fast, economical, and efficient in its storytelling, even as it became more superficial, more a children's movie than a family movie. But back then, it was much less of a distinction.

One of the most controversial changes in hindsight was dispensing with the Doctor’s backstory as an alien wanderer. The film didn’t dispense with it, it simply didn’t allude to it, leaving the conclusion that Doctor Who was simply a regular earthman.

Truthfully though, at this time, there was hardly any backstory to dispense with. The Doctor wouldn’t encounter another member of his race until the Time Meddler, later in that year. The Time Lords wouldn’t be named or appear until 1969 and the War Lords. The Doctor’s two hearts, the name of his homeworld Gallifrey, would only show up in the Pertwee era, and it would take Tom Baker’s Doctor to actually visit Gallifrey. In the beginning of 1965, all we knew was that the Doctor and his granddaughter was not from Earth and he seemed to be hiding. All the backstory, all the legend and lore of the Doctor, that was still to be invented, back in 1965... there just wasn’t enough to matter.

Even the name, Doctor Who, rather than simply ‘Doctor’ or ‘The Doctor’ would periodically show up in the television series, in serials like the War Machine or Underwater Menace, and would remain on the credits until well into the Pertwee/Baker era.

Again, at the time, it just didn’t matter. The real stars of the show, however, were Daleks, and AARU gave us more, bigger and brighter Daleks than ever seen before. Eight full working Daleks were commissioned from Shawcraft, in February, 1965, at a cost of $350 pounds apiece, another ten full sized prop daleks, with working lights and poseable limbs were cast at Shepperton plaster, for a veritable army of eighteen Daleks. Up to this time, the BBC itself had built only six. The AARU Daleks would be taller to make them more intimidating, with larger fender skirts, larger dome lights, and some of them were equipped with claws rather than suckers. Instead of solarizing a television image, which wasn’t practical, they would actually fire jets of smoke, rather than drawn in laser beams. An earlier notion to equip them with flamethrowers died quickly, fortunately for all. Most gloriously of all, they were in full colour - electric blue, resplendent gold and fire engine red.

The only downside was that during shooting, the Director didn’t realize that the Daleks dome lights were meant to flash in time with their dialogue, and so they simply flashed randomly. This made for post-production headaches as editors struggled to synch up Dalek voices to the dome lights.

Also impressive were the sets. Taking place on an alien world, Doctor Who and the Daleks were entirely set bound. And what spectacular sets these were. The production went all out, renting Shepperton Studio’s largest sound stages, including the largest sound stage in Europe. An entire petrified forest, complete with charcoaled animals, dim and forbidding in somber blues and greens. The Dalek City was an alien artscape of peaches and bronze. There was even the lava cliff face, before the Dalek city, reproduced with fiberglass, as a climbable forty foot prop. There was an entire village of Thals, and the Thals themselves rendered as day glo androgynous toughs.

All of this in the super-saturated intensely bright colours that were the hallmark of British Cinema in the the 1960's. Colour had been around, but it had been expensive, and the frugal British Cinema of the 40's and 50's had made do with black and white. But now that it was financially viable, British film makers went wild with colour in the sort of way that only a child with a brand new toy can.

It was a glorious cotton candy confection of a movie, and not just for colour. The television show would not go to colour until 1970, five years later. It was in Widescreen, something the series would not attempt until 2005.

Doctor Who and the Daleks cost 180,000 pounds. With an exchange rate of about $2.80 per pound, that came to a roughly half a million dollar budget. Compared to other genre offerings, 1964's ‘The Time Traveller’ by Ib Melchior, came in at about $250,000. The Budget for Amicus previous offering, Dr. Terror’s House of Horrrors was roughly 105,000 pounds, or slightly better than a quarter million dollars. Doctor Who and the Daleks was entirely respectable and within the range for a genre offering.

Still, it wasn’t huge. In comparison, the Beatles ‘Help’ cost 1.5 million, and the James Bond film of the year cost 9 million. The massively inflated budgets of the modern era were still decades away, and film budgets were all over the map. A James Bond or a Doctor Zhivago might cost several millions, but on the other side of the map, a $50,000.00 B-movie could still get theatrical release. American movie budgets on the whole, probably averaged a half million to a couple million. British budgets were often under a million.

As always, there were huge discrepancies between American and British films, between Studio and Independant productions, and between big movies and small ones.

Whatever it’s shortcomings, Doctor Who and the Daleks looked far bigger and more expensive than its costs, which is not something that can be easily or often said.


Note: All of this is basically OTL. I've made a few assumptions about who made decisions or how they were made, but it's pretty much a straight retelling.

Doctor Who and the Daleks, on my grandmother's colour television, in St. John, New Brunswick in the early 70's was probably my first exposure to Doctor Who. I don't remember a lot of it, but I do remember some of the striking images and colours, including the petrified lion. It would be another decade or so before I discovered and got into the television series.

It's reputation has suffered as the decades have worn on. This is partly because the show evolved in different directions, and there's been a tendency to judge the movie against standards that weren't in place at the time. It's also partly because with colour television, reruns, VHS and DVD and the raw longevity of the old and new series, a lot of things that made it special don't seem so special now. Partly because the past is an undiscovered country and so many of the things that were going on back then that made the movie so special are now forgotten to us, we're looking at an artifact from an alien land, and so no wonder it doesn't speak to us in the same way.

Having watched it again recently I'm struck by how visually gorgeous it is. It's as much a product of its time, a visual product of its time, as Barbarella, or the most overwrought Hammer spectacle. In comparison, 2001 seems restrained and drab in comparison. With its day glo sensibility, the visual androgyny of the Thals, its almost perverse disregard for large parts of what is now rote formula I think it's worth reappraisal. I'm not sure I'd call it a classic, ultimately while the script moves faster and is more efficient and watchable than the Hartnell serial, a lot of subtext has been left out and the impression is somewhat shallow and juvenile. But it is, confidently, its own thing. That's to be respected.
 
Last edited:
Doctor Who and the Daleks - Movie Synopsis

Doctor Who is an amiable sort, who lives with his two granddaughters, Barbara and Susan. They're both brilliant, and the younger one, twelve year old Susan, is especially precocious.

One day, his older Granddaughter, Barbara brings her boyfriend Ian home. The Doctor makes the mistake of showing him his time machine, which he's built inside a police box in the back yard. Turns out it's a lot bigger on the inside, but it's mostly a mess of electronics and black backdrop.

Ian is an idiot and stumbles over a lever, accidentally catapulting it through time and space. Ian will spend a lot of the movie stumbling over things, falling down, and generally being comic relief.

They end up in a mysterious petrified forest, and are momentarily startled by a petrified lion... until Ian falls on it, destroying it. They spot a strange city in the Distance, and decide to check it out. Ian and Barbara want to go home, but the Doctor fakes a malfunction. They discover a mysterious package left outside the Tardis.

When they arrive at the city, they discover that the whole planet is radioactive and they’re suffering from radiation poisoning. Before they can do anything about it, they are captured by the City’s inhabitants, the Daleks.

It turns out that the mysterious package was anti-radiation serum. The Daleks want it, so that they can leave the city and exterminate their enemies the Thals. Susan is sent to get more. She meets the Thals, who are kind of nice and a little gay. One of them gives her some extra anti-radiation serum and a plastic cape.

Susan comes back to the city. The Daleks take the serum, but Susan hid some of it. She saves her friends. The Daleks decide to use Susan to to lure the Thals to the city with offers of food and shelter, and then exterminate them.

Meanwhile, our heroes trick and manage to kill a Dalek, and then one of the group hides inside the Dalek shell and under guise of escorting prisoners, the group manages to escape. Unfortunately, the Daleks still have an essential part of the Tardis, so the group cannot go anywhere.

After escaping, Susan leads them to the Thals. Unfortunately, the Thals are pacifists and unwilling to fight the Daleks, but the Doctor manages to convince them to give that up, because... you know, genocide.

On the one hand, the Doctor and his people are clearly self serving in trying to rouse the Thals to fight for them, because they need the Thals in order to recover their spare part from the Daleks. If they don't get it, they can never go home.

On the other hand, the Daleks are pretty clearly bent on genocide of the Thals by any means necessary. Of course, the Daleks had spent centuries or millennia leaving well enough alone because it never occurred to them that the Thals had survived. So really, the Doctor is to blame for stirring them up.

The Doctor and Susan leads the Thals on a failed raid on the city, using mirrors to try and confuse the Daleks sensors. But the Thals retreat and the Doctor and Susan are captured.

The Daleks try the anti-radiation serum on themselves. Unfortunately for the Daleks, they discover the serum is toxic to them, so they cannot leave their city. They decide the only way to get rid of the Thals is to nuke the planet all over again. This seems like a bit of an overreaction, given that the Thals are pretty much harmless primitives a few meals away from starvation. (indeed, it's the threat of starvation that has lead them so close to the Dalek city, the traditional hunting grounds have been failing).

Ian and Barbara then lead the Thals on another attack on the city from the rear. They stop the bomb, there's a big fight in the control room, the Daleks are destroyed. In the end, it’s Thals one and Daleks zero. Everyone lives happily ever after.

With his spare part restored, the Doctor, his granddaughters and Ian can return home. Unfortunately, when they look out of the Tardis at their next stop, they’re on a roman battlefield.

The movie follows the television serial pretty much beat for beat, except for the opening and closing scenes. It's in gorgeous full colour, stereoscope, and everything is bigger, brighter and bolder. Apart from obviously editing and contracting, the principal chances are the handling of the characters, with Susan being brighter, braver and more resourceful than her teenage counterpart, Ian being a bit of a goof, and being friendly but also much more of a protagonist.

Note: This is the movie OTL. I debated including this synopsis, given that both the original serial and the movie are such well established parts of Doctor Who history. How can you be a Whovian and not know all about this. But, it's been 50 years, and while available, both stories are relatively rare. So here it is.
 
Last edited:
The Doctor and Susan leads the Thals on a failed raid on the city, using mirrors to try and confuse the Daleks sensors. But the Thals retreat and the Doctor and Susan are cancelled.


Cancelled ? I guess that's supposed to be "captured", but it sounds like the Daleks have got a new catchphrase.

All OTL so far. Presumably the POD is going to be something that makes the second film more commercially successful.

Cheers,
Nigel
 
Cancelled ? I guess that's supposed to be "captured", but it sounds like the Daleks have got a new catchphrase.

All OTL so far. Presumably the POD is going to be something that makes the second film more commercially successful.

Cheers,
Nigel

I wouldn't be surprised if it was. Also I doubt this will affect Cushing''s career that much. He was already churning out vast numbers of movies a year in the 60's so what's one more. On the other hand it may increase his health problems (he was quite ill at times in the 70's).

Also I wonder if this will make him want to play Tarkin even more, he'd be even more of a hero archetype in this TL having played the Doctor as well as Van Helsing and he seems to enjoy the villain roles he did take so he may want to avoid being typecast.
 
Interesting choice.

I wonder which of his OTL roles will get butterflied. I'd say that he probably won't have time to appear as Sherlock Holmes in the 1968 BBC series, which sounds like it would be a relief to him as he doesn't seem to have enjoyed it much.

Cheers,
Nigel.

I hope this had no effect on his radio work. Especially his appearance in the Price of Fear episode The Man Who Hated Scenes and another programme he did with Vincent Price called Aliens In The Mind.

On the other hand I'm looking forward to more Dr Who movies in place of the Amicus Doug McClure vehicles of the 1970s: Dr Who and the Warlords of Atlantis; Dr Who at the Earth's Core; and Dr Who in the Time That Land Forgo perhaps? With the Clapper Board making of documentaries on Youtube.
 
Cancelled ? I guess that's supposed to be "captured", but it sounds like the Daleks have got a new catchphrase.

All OTL so far. Presumably the POD is going to be something that makes the second film more commercially successful.

Cheers,
Nigel
:) Shades of the new Cybermen? "You will be cancelled".
 
Top