Co Australian-Canadian project with filming requirements in both locations?
This is getting more and more murky. I would not be surprised if the BBC doesn’t chip in and demand some filming in Britain!
Given its shaping up to be such a Commonwealth production I wonder if there is any pan-Commonwealth fund they can tap into?
Did like the cycle round to the Red Phone Box though.
I suppose I didn't have to do the cycle round. I just liked to play with the idea of the way ideas sometimes morph uncontrollably because everyone thinks that they have to make a creative contribution.
The classic example was J.M. Straczynski and his Babylon 5/Crusade projects, where he literally constantly had to fight enthusiastic but incompetent meddlers - studio executives who knew nothing, but constantly gave him 'notes' and sometimes 'demands.' Apparently, Sliders was also a victim of that syndrome. The level and sort of interference or 'creative input' varies a lot, but it can be hard to say 'no' too.
If you're sitting with an Executive, or a Producer, who goes "I love your proposal and I want to back it, but I think that what you need is a three breasted stripper from the planet of sex-amazons, and a cute robot." What do you do? If this is a guy with in a position to bury your idea forever, or at least put you back on the merry go round of pitching, or a who can say yes.... There's a lot of temptation to just go with the amazons and robot.
That kind of thing can extend to basic concepts for the show, or backstory, who gets cast, angles and approaches, or trivial things like costumes. It can be maddening.
But the reality is that the Entertainment Industry is full of people who either are, or want to be creative. The business side is full of people who need to justify their existence. The guy who looks at a proposal and says 'that's fine the way it is.' Well, what contribution has he made, apart from saying 'OK.' Any idiot can say 'Okay. Why was he needed, what's he offering. But if he can give a few notes, show he's made creative input, he justifies (hopefully) his involvement. He's not a rubber stamp, he's a 'contributor.'
And there's another side of it. Putting those ideas in, gives you a sense of ownership, commitment to the project. Makes you feel valued, and part of it. You're more inclined to support it. You're personally invested.
In fact, in some areas, its vital. Whenever a new writer comes on a project, the first thing they do is change all the names of characters that the previous writer did on the script. That's the easiest way to make your mark. They'll go through, and literally strip out the best lines, to replace them with their own shittier lines (hopefully, they wanted to write better lines, but sometimes they make things worse). They'll rearrange order, change scenes, drop some, write new scenes. Why do this act of vandalism? Because of credit - whose name goes up on the screen. Writers guilds have arbitrations and criteria to see who gets that movie credit on screen. If you can get that movie credit, you get more money, you get recognition, and you get more and higher level (credited work). So as a new writer, almost your first duty to yourself is to sabotage the previous writer. I've seen script editors brought into perfectly good scripts, and they just trashed it. Why? Because if they said it was fine, then they couldn't justify their fees.
Ideas, concepts, plots and themes constantly get massaged. Even with Doctor Who, if you look at the documentaries about the genesis of the show, you'll see that the initial ideas changed, sometimes dramatically, and continued to change. The Doctor was originally a human from the future. His Tardis was invisible. The Doctor was actively senile.
So, I wrote Saltzman's ideas as kind of a modernist take on the concept, without the historical baggage, but with the progressive sensibilities of someone who produced an environmentally friendly family adventure series with messages, like Danger Bay, someone not invested in the lore, but who took inspirations from contemporary sources like Sliders and Stargate.
Also, I wanted to see if I could make Doctor Who fans have a stroke.
And it was fun to do this, and then have Moses Znaimer set it all back. Although technically, it's not going back to the way it was, it's just adopting Znaimers new ideas.... which coincidentally happened to be the old format. In a sense, it's different perspectives. Saltzmann may actually have had quite a decent grasp of the underlying spirit of Doctor Who.... he's very in line with Sydney Newman's objectives for the show, for instance, and he's at least on side with the idealism of the Doctor. Znaimer's approach is less engaged, and more surface - he wants something equivalent to the police box, and the red phone booth is the easiest reach. For him it's part of the image, like requiring a starship Enterprise for Star Trek.
There's no commonwealth film fund I'm afraid, just national ones. The US market is so gargantuan that it doesn't have or need this. But small countries, including Germany, England, Canada, Australia etc., invest government money to support cultural industries.
All the stuff about how the money gets put together, the public funding, co-productions, house of cards, by the way, is essentially the way it really works for a lot of television and film production outside the United States. The situations where the BBC simply puts up the money and that's it, for example are rarer.
It can be overlooked, because often, productions aimed at the American market can look a lot less cobbled together. But that's because you're syndicating to multiple purchasers from essentially the same culture.
Paul Saltzman, and Sunrise Pictures, by the way, is a real person. I used to watch some of his programs, including Danger Bay, and My Secret Identity. By all accounts, he comes across as very principled, idealistic, professional, and decent. Perhaps a bit too sincere. But this is a guy who hung out with the Beatles in India, learned meditation, hung out with McLuhan and fell in love with India. I chose him because his career seems to have gone quiet at the right time. I think he probably made his money and took a few years off. But he was available. And his career suggested a good fit/not fit, a producer who might embrace Doctor Who, but also who might not get it. Who would end up as a force in conflict, trying to drag the show in certain directions.
This isn't in his record - but in the 1990's, Canadian companies were pioneering the use and development of CGI. So expect that to come in from that angle.
Moses Znaimer, is also a real person, as is City-TV, CHUM, and the Canadian Sci Fi Channel. And quite an interesting and accomplished one. His role in the story is limited, and now concluded. He's got a lot going on, and his casual purchase of a legacy series, and his feedback over lunch is as far as his involvement gets.
The Canadian Sci Fi Channel was called 'Space' and it premiered on October 17, 1997. As noted, part of its mandate was to support or generate programming - which they did through Lexx (space opera), Conspiracy Guy (low budget comedy), Innerspace (talking heads/documentary), short films etc.
The pathway of Burton meeting Saltzman, leading to Znaimer, leading to a Space Channel buy, leading to using that as a tentpole to build up a house of cards of funding commitments and international purchases, is plausible and has numerous precedents.
Terry Nation, is a real person, obviously. The notion of Nation inserting himself into the project is also plausible. Terry doesn't have enough credibility or juice to push a series on his own. But he's got enough to make a package like this seem more serious, if his name is attached to it. This is the deep sunset of his career, so he's inclined to grab onto it. Terry is charming, smooth, business savvy and loyal only to himself.
The model of international co-productions is also pretty solid. I can give you various examples. Lexx, Highlander, etc.
A great example is Starhunter, produced in Canada by Jackson/D'or. But as a British co-production, money had to be spent on British talent. So in the first season two of the five core cast members were British... and worked in England. One played a hologram who shot all his scenes separately in England and just got composited in. The other also shot in England, and did opening and closing 'commentary' as the Employer of the protagonists. Commitments from French and German television meant that the show had a lot of different accents, because actors were all over the place - they had to hire french and german actors to justify french and german funding. Behind the scenes, directors, writers, creative tech, special effects, were farmed out all over, based on funding commitments.
Sadly, Jerome Armquist and Ken Roarch are both fictional characters. I just have a lot less command of the Australian film and television industry in the 1990's, As far as I can determine, the Australian business and funding models are relatively accurate. While Jerome and Ken are fictional, they're also based relatively loosely on people I've known personally, or heard or read of in the business.
Jerome is absolutely mercenary. If Paul Saltzman may be a slightly misguided idealist out of tune with and occasionally at cross purposes with the show, then Jerome simply cares about the deal and the money, and making it happen. He has no interest in the creative side.
Ken on the other hand, is almost a fanboy. He understands the show almost as well as Terry and David. On the other hand he's also a hustler and b-movie guy, so his sensibilities are much coarser, and more flamboyant. His ideas for the series "tits and explosions." Gratuitious nudity, or as much as he can get away with for television. He knows, and would like to use martial arts choreographyers, stunt men, pyrotechnics, etc. He's a practical effects guy.
As an example of one of his ideas: He likes the Tardis console, but instead of a time rotor, he wants a greenscreen, so that they can project the top half of a naked woman (delicate parts carefully obscured by static), who can talk and interact as the voice of the Tardis, delivering exposition, and providing a slot for a credited cast member. The sort of idea that would leave Saltzmann horrified, and Burton stunned. He's about a pushy enthusiasm that can cause headaches.
Anyway, setting various personalities up for conflict behind the scenes.