However Blairwitch decides to write the TL will be fine and whatever "front focus" he chooses will be fine too.
I'd like to address another issue however: POV writing in timelines.
Putting it bluntly, most TL writers absolutely suck when it comes to POV writing and, despite that fact, far too many TL writers include POV sections in their work.
Otherwise serviceable timelines are dragged down by cringe worthy POV posts crammed full of anachronisms, modern slang, modern thought processes, and other completely avoidable idiocies. No matter how good the idea and the POD and no matter how well the events themselves are handled, the inclusion of wretched POV posts cannot help but destroy the timeline as a whole. I can't count the number of times I've stopped reading a timeline after the jarring effect of a wretched POV post.
Making matters worse, it seems lately that more and more timelines consist of nothing but POV posts. People who can barely even compose a coherent sentence in prose now somehow think they can write descriptive dialogue.
Reading POV posts within a timeline is like being subjected to karaoke night. Just because a few people can actually sing and a few writers like Jared or Blairwitch can craft POV posts, it doesn't necessarily follow that everyone should step to the microphone or that everyone should write POV posts.
A series of events presented in descriptive prose works just fine and has always worked just fine. There's no reason to add POV posts unless you're an accomplished writer and very few of us here are accomplished writers.
Here's two tricks you can use to determine whether that POV post really belongs in your timeline.
First, if you're asking the question of whether it belongs or not, it doesn't belong. Second, read the passage aloud. If it sounds bad out loud, it will read just as badly if not worse.
Bill