“Has anyone noticed that Sega does 2-D games a lot better than Nintendo does or is that just me?”
-an anonymous poster on an InsideTheWeb.com video game forum
It's a pickle and a shame, that. A focus on artistry and style (in 2D) over raw (3D) graphical would play to the Saturn's strengths and give it a distinct identity from the Ultra, which it can't beat in terms of horsepower. However, I can't see Sega doing such a thing in this era. I get a sense that the SNES-CD had allowed for a more gradual introduction of 3D graphics and phase-out of 2D graphics, but in this particular era I think gamers and the gaming press would be biased towards thinking of any 3D graphics as "advanced" while even excellent 2D graphics would be somewhat "old-fashioned".
I wonder if the Saturn's reputation will benefit in the long-term (like, 2010+) from its ability to do excellent 2D graphics, resulting in games that hold up better over time. Early 3D graphics generally age poorly.