CaliGuy
Banned
Starting from 1900 (to the present day), was it ever plausible for the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene and help decide a U.S. Presidential election other than the 2000 one if such an election was as close as 2000 was?
For the record, the reason that I'm asking this is that, even in 2000, only five U.S. Supreme Court Justices actually wanted to hear the Bush v. Gore case; indeed, the other Justices and many observers falsely believed back in 2000 that such an intervention would severely damage the credibility of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Anyway, any thoughts on this?
For the record, the reason that I'm asking this is that, even in 2000, only five U.S. Supreme Court Justices actually wanted to hear the Bush v. Gore case; indeed, the other Justices and many observers falsely believed back in 2000 that such an intervention would severely damage the credibility of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Anyway, any thoughts on this?