The first Amobea, obviously. If we can`t include this, then Mitochondrial Eve, obviously.
Jul 30, 2011 #21 Chairwoman Roxelana TurkishCapybara said: The first Amobea, obviously. Click to expand... If we can`t include this, then Mitochondrial Eve, obviously.
TurkishCapybara said: The first Amobea, obviously. Click to expand... If we can`t include this, then Mitochondrial Eve, obviously.
Jul 30, 2011 #22 SavoyTruffle TurkishCapybara said: If we can`t include this, then Mitochondrial Eve, obviously. Click to expand... Even more so than Y-chromosomal Adam.
TurkishCapybara said: If we can`t include this, then Mitochondrial Eve, obviously. Click to expand... Even more so than Y-chromosomal Adam.
Jul 30, 2011 #23 Once I think "most profound" has a pretty common intuitive definition in this respect, but one can define it however one likes.
I think "most profound" has a pretty common intuitive definition in this respect, but one can define it however one likes.
Jul 31, 2011 #25 chr92 A good claimant would be Qin Shih Huangdi, whose destruction of learning so crippled Chinese civilisation. Its neighbours had so much less to learn, too.
A good claimant would be Qin Shih Huangdi, whose destruction of learning so crippled Chinese civilisation. Its neighbours had so much less to learn, too.
Jul 31, 2011 #26 Thespitron 6000 The OP says "person", not "human", so one could make a case for God, since canonically he is behind at least four on Yelnoc's list.
The OP says "person", not "human", so one could make a case for God, since canonically he is behind at least four on Yelnoc's list.