https://books.google.com/books?id=1laU3T9HWYsC&pg=PA155
Pilsudksi did not want the Whites to win the Civil War--he thought that with their "Russia one and indivisible" ideology they would be an even greater threat than the Reds to Poland--so he refrained from any major fighting against the Bolsheviks at this time. But beyond this "passivity" (as Carr calls it) he would not go; he would not agree to a formal peace with the Bolsheviks. His goal was to create a federation of Poland and the nations between Russia and Poland (Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine) and for that purpose he formed an alliance with the Ukrainian nationalist leader Petliura. The sequel in 1920 (Poles and Petliura take Kiev, are driven back, Bolsheviks cross the Curzon line, Poles defeat them, etc.) is well-known and often discussed here.
My question is, Suppose Pilsudski had accepted the Bolsheviks' late 1919 bid for a formal peace? An obvious argument against his doing so is that the Bolsheviks, once they had defeated the Whites, would not respect the borders agreed to but would attack the Poles. But would they? They would have to know that Poland was (unlike, say, Georgia) a fairly strong military power, and one moreover that might get substantial Western support if attacked without provocation. Anyway, suppose the border lasts (either because the Bolsheviks don't invade or are thrown back if they try). What are the consequences of Poland extending further east than in OTL and having larger Ukrainian, Belorussian, and Jewish minorities?
Last edited: