Peter Goes East: An Alternate Russia

Peter Goes East
A Russian Timeline



“Where the Russian flag has once been hoisted, it must never be lowered.”
(Tsar Nicholas I)

“For a mad dog, seven versts is not a long journey.”
(Russian Proverb)​

Chapter 1


An excerpt from “Petrus: The Tsar Of The East” (1939, St. Petersburg-on-the-Ob University Press)

Our God is a sarcastic god and loves to play practical jokes on unsuspecting mortals below. A facet of this is history’s tendency to turn on the smallest and most unimportant things one could imagine—a certain unpopular man being killed in a backwoods town, or perhaps an unmeant smirk at a funeral. One would think such things would demean the good, honest profession of historian. No, indeed, they make it the truest and most pious expression of the Lord’s will known to me(1).

Perhaps the greatest of these small pivots was the heroic action of Boyar(2) Boris Petrovich Sheremetev at the Battle of Zelenaya Dolina on 15 May, 1689. For four months, the grand Russian army assembled by the great statesman Vasily Vasilyevich Galitzine had marched through the Wild Fields(3), bound for the Crimean fastness of Perekop, where Galitzine hoped to cripple the power of the Sublime Ottoman State in the Black Sea and aid Russia’s allies in their holy war against the heathens. However, unbeknownst to Galitzine, a horde of nearly 20,000(4) Tatars had left the Crimea and were ranging the Ukraine, hunting for the Russians themselves. On May 10, a Tatar scout spotted the Russians only a few miles from the town of Zelenaya Dolina. And so, five days later, the massive barbarian army launched a surprise assault on the rear of Galitzine’s army, aiming to capture the Russian baggage train. The rearguard almost immediately began to crumble under the assault, as they were weak and hungry after months of travel.

The army’s destruction would have come about were it not for the Achillean(5) Sheremetev, who, upon a great black steed, rallied the troops, calling on “Mary, Joseph, and the Lord himself!” to grant the Russians courage and lead to victory over the heathen. The troops, heartened, turned and fought the Crimeans, forcing them back temporarily: this momentary retreat was long enough, however, for the Russian artillery to ready for a second assault. Only minutes later, this second assault came, a renewed wave of Tatars rushing towards Sheremetev’s force—only to be met with cannon, musket, and the ring of steel-on-steel(6), forcing them back once again with heavy losses. By this time, Galitzine had realized what was happening, and rallied his own cavalry to inflict a stunning defeat on the Tatars, utterly dispersing them.
This victory proved the turning point in Russia’s campaign against the Crimeans.

Encouraged by his own military prowess, Galitzine and his army reached Perekop on May 18(7), catching the Tatars off guard. The Mohammedans had attempted to dig a great ditch across the isthmus, so as to keep artillery from being drawn up to the fastness—however, the ditch was not more than half-finished, and was quite shallow in width in its greatest portions, allowing Galitzine to bombard the fortifications with impunity. The Tatars had not had time to burn off the grass in the area, while drinkable water was provided by a small lake nearby(8). Thus, in a position of extreme advantage and with superior numbers and weaponry, the Russians were able to bombard the Tatars into surrender by June 6(9), allowing Galitzine entrance into the Crimea itself. However, Galitzine, ever the statesman, decided to negotiate from a position of strength rather than enter into a war with the strong opponent the Crimeans were.

And so, on June 22, 1689, Vasily Vasilyevich Galitzine and his Crimean counterpart, Selim I Giray, Crimean Kan(10), signed the Treaty of Perekop, by which the Crimean Kanate left the war against the Grand Alliance and became a vassal state of Russia: Russia also took possession of Perekop itself, allowing the Russians control of the access to the peninsula. His campaign accomplished, Galitzine returned to Moscow.

***

On July 12, the day after Galitzine had reached Moscow, the victor and his army were treated to a massive victory parade through the streets of the ancient city, delighting the populace and enveloping them in nationalistic fervor. Behind this façade of victory, Galitzine was troubled: yes, Russia had won a great victory and gained the respect of her allies, but in the distant east, the Manchurians(11) threatened the Russian colonies on the Pacific shore while the Ottomans remained a threat to the southeast.

Perhaps it was divine inspiration(12). Perhaps it was confidence in his own abilities gained by his victories(13). Whatever, the case, on July 17, Galitzine and his lover the Tsarevna Sophia came up with what is generally acknowledged to be one of the most brilliant political gambits in Russian history. Deciding to deal with both problems at once, Galitzine sent a long and apologetic letter to the Manchurian envoys, apologizing for not being able to treat with them at the moment, for he had to deal with the Ottomans. At the same time, Sophia dispatched two regiments of streltsy(14) to reinforce the Russian garrison in the Amur River valley, so as to give the Russians a position of advantage in the region. Here, however, was where the unexpected intervened.

Hearing of the streltsy leaving Moscow, the young co-tsar Peter made a rare visit to his sister and her lover to question them. Galitzine, seeing an opportunity to get rid of the strong young tsar, told him of his plan, and wondered out loud where he could get more troops to reinforce the Amur garrison. Peter, eager to fight, at once offered his two self-trained regiments of Imperial Guardsmen stationed at the small towns of Preobrazhensky and Semenovsky, along with his foreign advisors, and, of course, himself. When Galitzine feebly protested, Peter insisted on it—seemingly reluctantly, Galitzine accepted.

And so, on August 1, 1689, Peter Alexeyvich Romanov left Moscow with a cohort of 20,000 men, bound for the Amur River Valley, changing history forever.

Notes

(1) You should already be able to tell that Russia and the world are extremely different in this TL. Also, I want to warn you beforehand that this author is extremely biased towards Russia, so we will be seeing some mistakes and some more outright fabrications.
(2) In OTL, he’s known as the first Russian count. Here, he’s just another boyar.
(3) Polish-Lithuanian and Russian term for the Ukraine.
(4) More like 12,000.
(5) “Like Achilles”. It’s a word now.
(6) Our good narrator neglects to mention the terrible losses suffered by the Russians in this countercharge.
(7) Two days before OTL, meaning that the Tatars are much less prepared than OTL. IOTL, they had just barely finished preparing their defenses (a 7km ditch which drained that lake mentioned later).
(8) Unlike OTL.
(9) Again, neglecting to mention the significant Russian losses and difficulties taking the fort.
(10) TTL’s spelling of “Khan”.
(11) TTL’s word for the Manchu Empire.
(12) It wasn’t.
(13) It was.
(14) The streltsy were the elite guard units established by Ivan the Terrible, intended to form a professional core for Russia’s army. In reality, they became corrupt and lazy, and often revolted, causing significant problems for the Tsars. Our narrator fails to mention that the two regiments sent are some of the most troublesome.

* * *

I like Russia. Do you like Russia? If you like Russia, you might like this. Do comment and criticize, etc.
 
Last edited:
Like it, its interesting to think of a more south and east focoused russia, although im not sure that will be quite as sucessfull in the long run. Is russia going to be more eastern culturally or will peter still try to westernize?

Boyars: beards or no beards?
 
oh... are you going to have peter die? that might not be good russia dosn't do well with dinastic crisses... also it would be fun and ironic if they end up allied to sweden and split poland-lithuania north/south between them
 
Like it, its interesting to think of a more south and east focoused russia, although im not sure that will be quite as sucessfull in the long run. Is russia going to be more eastern culturally or will peter still try to westernize?

Well, I can't be too explicit about the future of this TL, but I'm thinking it'll be more like OTL's Meiji Japan(i.e. preserving most traditional cultural power structures while adopting Western science, weaponry, and tactics).

Boyars: beards or no beards?

Definitely beards.

I think Peter will survive the expedition and build his city on the azov sea.

He'll definitely survive, but building a St. Petersburg-on-the-Azov? Eh....think more easterly. ;)

This is wonderful. I love the different POV for the POD.

This is going to be great.

Interesting. I'll be watching this.

Thanks, ya'll! The next update should be up tonight or tomorrow, depending on how fast I write.
 
Well, I can't be too explicit about the future of this TL, but I'm thinking it'll be more like OTL's Meiji Japan(i.e. preserving most traditional cultural power structures while adopting Western science, weaponry, and tactics).



Definitely beards.



He'll definitely survive, but building a St. Petersburg-on-the-Azov? Eh....think more easterly. ;)







Thanks, ya'll! The next update should be up tonight or tomorrow, depending on how fast I write.

Eastward-looking Russia becoming like OTL Meiji Japan? Looks like Peter would have his work cut out for him.
 
Wait...St. Petersburg-on-the-Ob? Would that be at or near OTL Novisibirsk? That's rather far east...I suspect large chunks of northern and western China will be Russian ITTL.
 
Eastward-looking Russia becoming like OTL Meiji Japan? Looks like Peter would have his work cut out for him.

I don't mean to make an exact parallel, more just the mix of Western technology and Eastern politics and culture.

Huh. Does him going east mean that the Swedish Empire survives a bit longer?

;)

Wait...St. Petersburg-on-the-Ob? Would that be at or near OTL Novisibirsk? That's rather far east...I suspect large chunks of northern and western China will be Russian ITTL.

Astute observation and cunning deduction, Watson. I will confirm that St. Petersburg-on-the-Ob is in fact between OTL's Novosibirsk and Barnaul, lying roughly on the border between Altai Krai Oblast and Novosibirsk Oblast. As for your deduction, well...

I like Russia. It looks like im going to like this. :D

:)
 
Well he can't intend to move his capital to somewhere on the Ob river. It would mean he would not only be far to the east of the centre of Russia's heartland but he would be past the frontier of actual settlement (as opposed to trading posts). Altai Krai wasn't even settled in otl till the 1890's.
 
Well he can't intend to move his capital to somewhere on the Ob river. It would mean he would not only be far to the east of the centre of Russia's heartland but he would be past the frontier of actual settlement (as opposed to trading posts). Altai Krai wasn't even settled in otl till the 1890's.

Yes, and? There was no one within a hundred miles or so of St. Petersburg. I don't find it the least bit of stretch to see that a Eastern-minded Peter would push the frontier of actual settlement several hundred miles east himself by building a new capital on the Ob as sort of a forward base. Anyway, it'll all make sense later.

Would OTL Vladivostok be founded a lot sooner?

Though Henriksson does make a good point, I'm thinking there'll still be a northern port to protect Russian interest in the Pacific Northwest (later). So, yes.
 
Yes, and? There was no one within a hundred miles or so of St. Petersburg. I don't find it the least bit of stretch to see that a Eastern-minded Peter would push the frontier of actual settlement several hundred miles east himself by building a new capital on the Ob as sort of a forward base. Anyway, it'll all make sense later.

Yes OTL St. Petersburg was the arse end of the world but it wasn't a complete wasteland, people did there, but much more importantly it was situated between two places. The Baltic was Russia's main access point to the west in military, economic and cultural terms and St. Petersburg in OTL sat right between it and the heart of Old Muscovy: the Moskva/Oka/Volga River basin where almost all Russians (rather than nomadic tribesman who sort of acknowledged the Tsar) lived. It linked the two and "brought" Russia into the West.
Now it is entirely plausible for a different Russian leader to decide that actually Russia's destiny doesn't lie in Europe, it lies on the vast steppe to the East. Moving the capital east is a possibility, maybe to Kazan or to the actual frontier which is the Urals. Yekatrinburg was founded towards the end of Peter's OTL reign and it's 861 miles or two months travel further east to Novosibirsk. So if you want a frontier city to act as Russia's new capital I would suggest Yekatrinburg, though that's a bit ASB to be honest. Or alternatively Tyumen, it may be only a glorified fort but it is Russia easternmost possession with a population over 2000.
For Peter the Great to move his capital to the Ob would be like Jefferson moving the US capital to Wichita immediately after the Louisiana purchase.
 
Last edited:
Top