WILDGEESE
Gone Fishin'
The Bristol Belvedere was hampered by a cabin that was way to small, width wise and with engines that where put at either end of the fuselage.
What if the money was available for development, plus sales optioned from the RAF/RN
What if the engines where set at the rear, CH-46/CH-47 style, with a fuselage shortened plus but widened to help with troop carrying capacity. Plus a lowered front set of wheels (which was a throwback to a RN spec, for carrying torpedo's)
How do you think this would perform compared to the Boeing Vertol CH-46 SeaKnight?
Could this be purchased instead of the S-58/Westland Wessex for the RN?
What sales do you think would be attained by the RAF/RN?
Would Australia/Canada/New Zealand be interested in buying this aircraft/
Regards filers
PS: HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR, TO EVERYONE ON THE FORUM, NO MATTER WHAT GOD YOU FOLLOW. GOD BLESS.
What if the money was available for development, plus sales optioned from the RAF/RN
What if the engines where set at the rear, CH-46/CH-47 style, with a fuselage shortened plus but widened to help with troop carrying capacity. Plus a lowered front set of wheels (which was a throwback to a RN spec, for carrying torpedo's)
How do you think this would perform compared to the Boeing Vertol CH-46 SeaKnight?
Could this be purchased instead of the S-58/Westland Wessex for the RN?
What sales do you think would be attained by the RAF/RN?
Would Australia/Canada/New Zealand be interested in buying this aircraft/
Regards filers
PS: HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR, TO EVERYONE ON THE FORUM, NO MATTER WHAT GOD YOU FOLLOW. GOD BLESS.
Last edited: