PAN EUROPEAN SS

I think you're the one who needs to learn how to read, I said that the numbers the OP posted were wrong, I never disputed that. What I did dispute was you putting in your own guesstimates as fact. Don't tell me that I'm misunderstanding when you yourself haven't actually read what I've written. If you had read what I had written and actually understood it, you'd realize that the only problem I actually have with what you've said is the fact that you decided that your own numbers were fact:

See, if you knew what "probably" means, you'd also know that I was not presenting 300 men in two companies as a fact. But as a probability.

And, you know, if one is somewhat knowledgeable, even guesses by him may have some value. Indeed, guess what, it seems nobody has ever claimed that those two companies may ever have had more than 300 men taken together. So my guess, correctly introduced as such by "probably", turns out to be correct.

I hope you don't mind if I'll refrain from reading your posts from now on, I feel it wouldn't be all that profitable if you don't know what "probably" means.
 
I think you're the one who needs to learn how to read, I said that the numbers the OP posted were wrong, I never disputed that. What I did dispute was you putting in your own guesstimates as fact. Don't tell me that I'm misunderstanding when you yourself haven't actually read what I've written. If you had read what I had written and actually understood it, you'd realize that the only problem I actually have with what you've said is the fact that you decided that your own numbers were fact:

and:

You're not disagreeing in substance with his assertions, you're just shouting "NUH UH" and then frantically backpedalling when he does back them up. That's not contributing, that's being a jerk. Don't be a jerk.
 
Top