Palmera (An African Resettlement AH)

Well-huh!

Here's the thing; researching British Florida, it turned out West Florida did not have its eastern border with East Florida at the OTL Florida-Alabama border (Perdito River, just west of Pensacola).

Also, Pensacola is a pre-British Spanish town, which British Florida or ATL Palmera would logically have inherited, but the name never occurs in the narrative, certainly not the parts post-1814.
{Edit--fixed the mixup between "Utina" and "Calusa"}
Here is a map showing the situation of British West Florida:
West_Florida_Map_1767.jpg


When Britain handed it over to the Spanish OTL, it had the same boundaries, and only after that did the boundaries of "Florida Occidental" start jumping all over the place, due to Yankee nibbling away at it. Having lost in succession the northern tier that strikes us so strangely today (just look at how far north west "Florida" reaches) and then the westernmost part of the coastal strip that left, the shrunken Spanish province, perhaps, was given a farther eastern border at the Suwanee to compensate for losing all but the southeast quadrant, and to relive the eastern province of some of its burden. I am only guessing at Spanish reasons for messing around with the divsions between the two parts of Florida they retained. Just observing that they did it, jiggered the borders around pretty frequently.

But from what you have written, I don't think the British would have had any reasons to juggle the boundaries around like that. They kept one divsion for 20 years or so, and given British power, would have no reason other than internal convenience to mess around later. I think that bureaucratic inertia would preserve the same Appallachee (aka West Palmera) from its foundation to the day Britain signs it away, and that is clearly on this map showing the OTL western 2/3 of the Florida panhandle belonged to the western province.

Between 1786 and 1814, the very thinly settled Appallachee province might indeed have suffered trespassing Yankee squatters, and Americans raiding onto the territory with little hinderance, and other forms of unrest and disorder at American hands, but under no circumstances would there be any question but that Britain held that territory, and would not be forced by petty harassment to abandon its claim to any of it. A sufficiently large amount of money might tempt someone in London to sell it, but to the American Rebels who were not fully honoring the terms of their damned peace treaty? I think not. It would take a full on declared war--for if the Yankees did not declare it formally before invading, an invasion of Appallachee would surely lead to Britain declaring it on the other side--in which Britain is forced to acknowledge a certain amount of defeat to alienate it. Therefore I reason it underwent none of the petty nibbling away over the years between, and thus when negotiators in Europe turned to their map books to remind themselves just what they were giving the Americans in the treaty, it would be these same 1763 boundaries they would refer to.

And you can see that Pensacola is clearly marked, in the middle, not beyond the eastern edge of, the West Florida/Appallachee province. The border would in fact be the Apalachicola River, which I think is perfectly suitable.

But here you are saying that it is in fact equal in area to all of OTL Florida--which is to say, at some point a big part of Appallachee got annexed to Utina.

I think you have several options here:

1) clarify your just now, in the last post's, statement that the British Dominion of Palmera looks exactly like OTL Florida all the way to Pensacola. You never claimed that before, you never mention Pensacola or any other indicator of holding anything in the west panhandle, and you named the west province Appallachee--a name that makes no sense at all if both sides of the Apalachicola River lie far within Utina. To be sure weird displacements like that happen in English language colonial geography--the state of Wyoming is a long way west of where the Wyoming Native nation used to live for instance. But if you were to say "looks a little bit like OTL Flordia in that there is a panhandle jutting west, but it is snub nosed (to me, Florida always looked like a hand gun, with the peninsula being the stock, the Apalachicola delta the trigger and Pensacola being the muzzle) since the border is well east of OTL's Perdido River, on the Apalachicola instead

2) clarify what turmoil before the War of 1812, caused the region between Perdido River and Apalachicola to be transferred over to Utina;

3) Go into more detail about the War of 1812 on the Palmeran front, such that the statement about the total abandonment of all of Appallachee is amended, presumably due to strong loyalist holdouts for British rule in both Pensacola and the Apalachicola river region, along with failure of the Americans or rebels to create counter-claims with strong settler presence in the regions in between them. Thus, instead of simply being totally defeated in all of Appallachee, we have the more nuanced situation of the southeast coast of the British province remaining loyalist and fighting off conquest, and if this was known to British treaty negotiators, then in light of the high cards Britain held during those negotiations, the US might be forced to accept that a piece of Appallachee is going to be carved off and retained by Britain, and that just by amazing coincidence, this piece happens to resemble the fragment of Florida Occidental they managed to hang on to up to the 1820's purchase--at which point it was the Americans who chose to consolidate the two provinces into one state.

If I were you I'd go with option 1, unless you really really wanted to include anything west of Apalachicola in some future chapter you were planning on. So far you've never mentioned it. The simplest thing to me seems to be to stick to those old 1763 boundaries, and reason that the far west, farthest from the African resettlement zones and the strong Seminole and other eastern tribes, would be "Sutchey" country, and Pensacola despite its Spanish name had long ago been captive of such interests. Presumably many of Utina's Sutchey rebels did flee west to consolidate US control after the failure of their attempts to deliver Utina to US hands as well, while British loyalists in former Appallachee would flee east.

Is there any reason at all Palmera needs to reach as far west as Pensacola? I actually have a personal dog in this race as it happens that I spent about half my childhood growing up in a town somewhat to the west of Apalachicola, Panama City, and by my reasoning this region will belong to Alabama now. But I resigned myself to that long ago; the fact is I have had little reason t long to return to Panama City since I left it, whereas holding the border at Apalachicola does keep certain rather nice places in Palmera. Reading the OTL history and extrapolating the ATL continuation of British rule, I could see no reason why Palmera would wind up with the entire Panhandle, not unless there were enough British troops and also loyalists to hold Appallachee as well as Utina, in which case we'd have quite a Florida-wank on on our hands! Given that you tossed the west to the wolves, quite realistically, I figure the West is all gone.

The northwest panhandle winding up part of Alabama is not too unfitting a fate too.

I greatly appreciate the rest of your geographical clarifications. Apparently nothing you've named or spent much time referring to ever happens in the panhandle, nothing anyway but Sutchey treachery.

By the way, I have no idea where names like "Sutchey" or "Jucker" come from, and perhaps if we had a bit of an explanation how the various quaint specially Palmeran terms came to be, it would be easier to keep their meanings straight!
 
Last edited:
Interesting. Don't know how I missed that about the West Florida border before, but that kind of feedback is why I'm posting this here, so thank you. It won't be difficult to correct that and I find your argument sound.

By the way, I have no idea where names like "Sutchey" or "Jucker" come from, and perhaps if we had a bit of an explanation how the various quaint specially Palmeran terms came to be, it would be easier to keep their meanings straight!

The various "Palmeyisms" are patois bubbling up into English, for the most part. They're based on a stew of borrowings from patois languages from around the Caribbean (that's where "jooker"/"jucker" comes from), and in a few cases from African languages. I should put up a glossary at some point.
 
Glossary of Palmey English Terms
A Selective Glossary of Palmey English.

There are already several "registers" of language by 1914. Standard English is the language of business, politics, and the educated elite. "Local" or "Palmey" English imports a variety of colloquialisms from the patois or "Chatta" of the streets. Chatta is essentially a separate language of its own, though people are still reluctant to admit it.

A number of Palmey English terms or other unfamiliar language occur in the text. The list below will be updated as the timeline progresses.

Abeng. A trumpet-like instrument made originally from cattle horn, used in Jamaica by maroons for signalling and ceremonies (and also on plantations to summon slaves to work). Later replicated in Palmera where they are used primarily as a symbol of working-class noireist nationalism and as noisemakers at sporting events.

Bassey.
A relatively neutral Chatta term for a Black man, derivation obscure.

Booney-man.
Slang from Chatta for a liquor smuggler and all-round gangster. From the Garifuna word "binu," meaning liquor.

Buckrah.
From Gullah and West Indian English. "Boss," a word used specifically to refer to plantation masters, overseers and bosses of chain gangs.

Buffalo Soldier.
Originally the "Negro Cavalry" formed at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. The name is repurposed by radical Dustie militias in Palmera known for lethal reprisal actions against the Night Riders (the Palmey version of the Klan). Precursors of the Nono Nemo Society.

Bulloe.
A goon. From a Garifuna word meaning "to punch."

Calusa.
South Palmera, the counties south of the Masterman Line between the 27th and 28th parallels. (From the Native American tribe of that name, whose territories centered on the area where Eleutheria was founded, around the IOTL site of Cape Coral.)

Combo.
Originally short for the Combined Expedition Force of Palmera and the British West Indies, as part of which most Palmey Servicemen served in the Great War. Via veteran fans and players in the post-war period it became applied to prestigious football squads.

Crucian.
An Epiphany carnival from the Leeward Islands, also celebrated in Palmera.

Culley.
Rhymes with "pulley." A federal land grant, most commonly for veterans. Derivation obscure but might be related to the Irish land measurement the "cumal," which was pronounced "cool." (There may be an obscure medievalist at work here, because at around thirty-six acres a culley is also similar in size to a cumal.) [Ed. -- in reality I did derive the term from "cumal." It's a bit archaic to actually crop up in this timeline but I liked the idea of a term popping in from the history of European slavery (a "cumal" was originally the price of a female slave that gradually migrated into being a land measurement); besides, it's more compact than saying "forty acres and a mule." In the timeline it's coined by some obscure over-educated bureaucrat.]

Cussid.
From West Indian English, meaning "accursed." A disparaging term for a strain of White supemacist that emerged after the Great War.

Doekoe.
A term for cash or coin. Doekoe music was popular or commercial music. (From West Indian English.)

Dooney.
The appellation of radical abolitionists in Palmera's early history. May originate with "dundoo" from West Indian English (which was a term for whites and probably insulting in context), or perhaps "dunnaroo" (a Garifuna term for a migrant or settler.)

Drover. A nickname for socialists during the early era of Palmey history. This one is direct from standard English and refers to the movement's sense of having to drive or shepherd the people.

Dustie. Short for "Exoduster," an African-American settler from the first major waves of "exodus" out of the American South, from the 1870s through to the "present." Also a nickname for members of the Liberty and Justice Party.

Filibuster. Palmeys used the term after its original sense to mean "mercenary," but it became specifically identified with pro-slavery or "anti-freedom" mercenaries like Josiah Harlan and William Walker. Palmey mercenaries were called "freebooters," and the term signified something more like "freedom fighter."

Gitchey.
From the Gullah term "geechee," the autonym of Gullah people from South Carolina. It migrates in Palmera to being a term for working-class Blacks, just as Sutchey becomes a term for poor Whites.

Habbu.
Farmer. From Garifuna "ubou," meaning country.

Hacktey.
From a Seminole word for "white." Liberal Whites who unequivocally support the cause of Palmeran freedom and racial equity.

Jolly-Boy.
Working-class football fans of the post-Great War period who gave rise to the first generation of football hooligans. Owing to the robust representation of women on the factory floors, football fanaticism came to be more than just a laddish phenomenon after the War and there were Jolly-Girls too. This very old Palmeyism originally referred to the "Jolly Roger" and piracy; in its more modern usage it denoted piratical morals or thuggishness.

Joss.
God in Chatta. From "djos" or "dios" in the Spanish-based creole Papiamento.

Jucker.
(Also "jooker.") From the Gullah word jook or juck, meaning to fight. The nickname of the Freedom Parties' members, and eventually those of the United Freedom Congress.

Ketch. Gullah word meaning a thug, hoodlum or trouble-maker. In Palmey usage it acquires a bit of a bias toward "White trash hoodlum" but it can be used for malcontents of any race.

Kitchener Camps. The internment camps used to crush Sutchey rebellion during the Third Border War. Named for their inspiration by Herbert Lord Kitchener, who would later go on to employ such camps against the Boers during the South African War.

Landship. Meaning "township," usually a rural town. Landship music meant "folk music." (From Bajian Creole.)

Lanney.
A Coloured person or Creole. (From a Seminole word meaning "yellow.")

Mandey. A folk musical genre descended from landship music. Typically consisted of various forms of percussion combined with banjo, guitar and probably a fiddle, concertina, hurdy-gurdy and/or penny-whistle. Popularized in recorded form in the Twenties, it is sometimes confused with Caribbean folk genres like Jamaican mento or Trinadadian calypso.

Marches, The.
The American states bordering Palmera, or the "slave states" of America more generally. Marcher meant someone from or a subject pertaining to these states. In archaic parlance The Slavers' Pale.

Montserrado. A province of British West Africa analoguous to IOTL Liberia. It's named for what would become a county of the country of Liberia in our history.

Muckya: An important person or official; someone who is Kind of a Big Deal. From a Marathi word meaning "chief" or "boss."

Night Riders. A Sutchey terrorist organisation around the time of the Third Border War, directly descended from the Ku Klux Klan. Swiftly crushed, but their name would live on as the colloquial term "Riderism" for Sutchey White supremacism until at least the turn of the century. [Ed. An actual alternative name of the early Klan IOTL.]

Noireism: Early Black Nationalism, inspired by the works of the pioneering Haitian anthropologist Antenor Firmin.

Nonay.
"Northern." Common term for Americans. Probably from "No-neg" ("North man") in Haitian Kriyol.

Nono Nemo Society.
In Greek, the "Godfather Nobody Society." Prone to terrorism and ritualized murder; the dark side of early 20th-century Black Nationalist student activism. They're basically the Palmey counterpart of the Ku Klux Klan.

Pascoe. Carnival in Palmera. From the Papiamento word for Easter, 'Pasko.'

Peck.
From "peckerwood." A much nastier grade of slur--almost always a fighting word--for the population more commonly called Sutcheys.

Redemption. A specifically Palmey phenomenon of the early nineteenth century which planters used to get around the abolition of the slave trade. African-American slaves were "redeemed" and "freed" from the Slavers' Pale, but were placed in debt peonage for the price of their "redemption" at interest rates that basically made actual freedom nearly impossible to attain. Protecting and/or reviving the "redemption economy" or the "compassionate necessity of redemption" was a core cause of Sutchey political movements right down to the Third Border War (by which point "redemption" would have at least in theory meant buying out the debt of peons in the Marcher states).

Riddey. "Chief." The rough equivalent of saying 'bwana' or 'massah.' From Garifuna.

Rissey. Russian. From Haitian Kriyol.

Shakers. A celibate millenarian Christian sect that emphasised work and self-sufficiently and often adopted orphans. They went into decline in America of OTL after the Civil War, but in this timeline achieve a longer lifespan in Palmera, where they're still vigorous by the early Twentieth Century. Ex-Shakers found new religions that play a part in Palmey history, particularly Yohannism and Tribulationism.

Slavers' Pale, The: Antebellum term for the American slave states, e.g. the Confederacy. The Pale for short. The more common term in 1914 is The Marches.

Sundown towns.
Not exactly a Palmey-ism but might be unfamiliar; this referred to towns with White supremacist charters that forbade people of colour from remaining in town after sunset. An actual phenomenon of American history, but in the Twentieth Century; in Palmera it arrives earlier.

Sutchey. Originally a term for anti-Loyalist Whites. Later a general slur for poor Whites. Derivation obscure but possibly from the Hausa word tsutsa (meaning "worm" or "maggot"). [Ed. -- I honestly can't remember where I got the word from, so "derivation obscure" is not entirely a dodge. I just like the sound of it. The Hausa derivation is as plausible as anything else.]

Tawney. Not a Palmey-ism but may be unfamiliar. This was a historical nineteenth-century American (and possibly British) slur for people of mixed race, just a different spelling of "tawny"; it turns up in the writings of Ben Franklin, for instance. It's used to some extent in Palmey English but without particular rancour or malice, in much the same register as a word like "cracker."

Teague.
Slang for an Irishman, or a Sutchey who at least claims Irish heritage. From the Gaelic name Tadhg, common enough to have become a synecdoche (or a slur) for Irish Gaelic men.

Toney.
An agent of the private Overton Security Agency. (The name derives from "Overton.") Head-breakers and union-busters extraordinaire, basically Palmera's version of the Pinkertons.

Touladi, The. The Parliament building in Eleutheria, metonymous with Palmera's government more generally. The term comes from a kind of freshwater char native to the Great Lakes, for obscure reasons. [Ed. -- It's just because it's distinctive and I like the sound of it. In-timeline it's probably because some diplomat ate "Touladi" at a state banquet and thought the fish would be a spirited icon for the gumption of the Nation.]

Trans-Makona, The. Region of Montserrado above the Makona River. A theatre of Union Mercantile Company activity from the latter 19th century, and the basis of Palmey perception of Montserrado more generally.

Tribulationism. A religion founded in the mid-1890s by ex-Shakers led by the visionary Sawney Hustus, later named Solomon ben Solomon. They were motivated by a belief that the Tribulation described in the Book of Revelation had already begun and that they were God's spiritual army against the Anti-Christ. They advocated a return of Biblical virtues, simplicity of diet, good works and Shaker-inspired economic self-sufficiency. They also had some much more controversial beliefs, such as that Palmera was the true Israel, that their prophet was the reincarnation of Solomon the Wise, that white skin was the Mark of Cain, and that polygamy was the natural order of marriage. (Later versions of the faith would renounce the last two of these doctrines.)

Tumbley. A post-Exoduster Black American immigrant who came to Palmera as part of the Great Migration, after the Great War. A reference to tumbleweeds and rather unflattering, though rarely a fighting word.

Utina.
The area of "East Palmera" surrounding Daltonville, or (as time progressed) more generally to the north of Palmera outside of Calusa. Named for a Native American tribe on the region's eastern coast.

Whyrah. Emigration from abroad to Palmera, especially by Blacks seeking freedom from oppression and racism elsewhere (usually meaning escape from Jim Crow in the States). To "make whyrah" is to engage in such emigration. First attested in the late-19th century but takes wider hold from the early days of the Great Migration. Probably from the Garifuna word "awaira," meaning to climb.

Wuttie. Road, track or byway. From Haitian Kriyol.

Yohannism. New religious movement dating to the late-19th/early-20th centuries, founded by Shaker Palmey emigrants to Jamaica. Combining anti-imperialism, anti-colonialism, Black nationalism, elements of both Shaker and Ethiopian Orthodox worship and a veneration of the Ethiopian Emperor Yohannes V, it's the timeline's possibly-more-eccentric counterpart of Rastafarianism.
 
Last edited:
I confused Calusa with Utina in my last post. Oops!
There, I edited all references to Calusa to Utina.

Anyway thanks for explaining the roots of the Palmey terms, it helps me process them better.

I always loved "Janusarries" by the way.

In real life, do you spend a lot of time in the islands? Or is all this from books?
 
Last edited:
Cripes! I need to put that one in the glossary!
No, most AH readers are going to have heard of Janissaries and the Roman god Janus, and once someone has the wit to coin the term in the right situation where it is keenly apt, it is pretty brilliantly clear. I also think you did explain it in text.

I mean, sure, put everything Palmey into the Glossary; it could be quite a comprehensive document, like a Tolkien or Frank Herbert appendix. But that one was crystal clear to me, yet still funny and sharp as its ATL coiner meant it to be.

I did wonder if I should ask you if you invented that one--if so, good on you!

And if someone else coined it and you're recycling it, good catch!

I like the Glossary having both an ATL voice and OTL gloss too--another Tolkienesque touch.
 
Very glad to hear "Janussaries" landed. Yes, thet's original to this TL so I'm glad it worked.

"Tolkienesque" is the kind of praise I didn't dare hope for, so thanks for that. :)
 
EDIT: As I get ready to post the next section of the timeline, I've made a couple of minor changes here. Helena was appearing as a "metropolis" too early, there need to be some serious alterations to the south Florida landscape for it to be possible, so it's Hillsborough that takes on the role of up-and-coming city now. Reflecting the smaller panhandle in this timeline, the Battle of the Blackwater -- site of Josiah Harlan's failed filibuster expedition -- becomes the Battle of White Oak Landing. "Menelik II" in Ethiopia has been corrected to "Yohannes IV." A couple of additions to the glossary.
 
Last edited:
Eh... only a couple of pages and you wanna make another thread???:confused:
Well, the rest of the timeline does take place post-1900, and there's a separate forum for that. *shrug* I guess there's some preamble I could keep in this thread, though, now you mention it.

Or can I get away with just keeping the whole timeline here given the pre-1900 POD? I'd much rather do that if that's kosher.
 

Zagan

Donor
Well, the rest of the timeline does take place post-1900, and there's a separate forum for that. *shrug* I guess there's some preamble I could keep in this thread, though, now you mention it.

Or can I get away with just keeping the whole timeline here given the pre-1900 POD? I'd much rather do that if that's kosher.
You must post the rest here. One TL, one thread. It's the POD that decides the forum, not the rest of the content.
 
The Hinge of History, Pt. 1
We begin the journey toward the Great War (WWI). This chapter, "The Hinge of History," describes some of the accumulating social forces that will unleash themselves with the Great War's advent, along with Palmera's involvement in the war itself.

Previously in the timeline:
The Spanish Period to Home Rule. A curious twist of fate results in a British resettlement project for Black freedmen going to the depopulated southern reaches of an alternate Florida named Palmera.
The Lion's Cub, Part One. The Union of Palmera battles tides of unrest washing out from America after the Civil War, culminating in the traumatic rebellion called the Third Border War.
The Lion's Cub, Continued. The Gilded Age unfolds in Palmera in a mingling of glory and tragedy.
The Lion's Cub, Conclusion. The Union cautiously begins to carve out a place in the international orders of politics, finance and trade.

To come in the timeline:
The Hinge of History, Pt. 2 ("We Shall Do What Must Be Done"). The Great War erupts, and the full cost in blood and moral compromise of Palmera's "lion's cub" aspirations becomes plain.
The Hinge of History, Pt. 3 ("Lift Every Voice and Sing"). Football, baseball and beach-side leisure provide windows onto three different episodes of postwar social change.

Resource Posts:
Palmera at the End of the Belle Epoque: A Snapshot. A map and a demographic summary of the Union of Palmera in the year 1914.
Glossary of Palmey English Terms. A glossary of Palmeyisms or otherwise unfamiliar language occurring in the text. Periodically updated as the timeline advances.

Story Posts:
The Deal. Tequesta County's rural isolation is set to make way for an age of development... but who will benefit?
Song of Songs. Though times are tough in the wake of the Great Tequesta Hurricane, little has changed in the rarified world of the social elite. Or has it?


The Hinge of History, Part One (Unseen Pressures Build):
The world could feel the Great War coming long before it happened. Escalating crises in the European system – including revolution in Turkey and attendant instability in the Balkans, and jockeying between France and an increasingly aggressive Germany with crises in Morocco leading to near-war on more than one occasion – were clearly going to lead to a point of no return.

Palmera found herself drawn into the web of intrigue and instability through her relationship with Yohannes IV's government in Ethiopia. The country was active in famine relief after the Mahdist War and the Palmey adventurer Henry Hill – who became Yohannes IV's Dejazmach or “Viceroy” and was nicknamed Addisu or “the newcomer” at court – played a key role in recruiting freebooters to assist the training of Ethiopian troops, a role which put him in contact with Russia, whose Tsar was intent on providing support to a fellow Orthodox power as Italy made a bid for her own colonial empire in the country (based on claims of having a protectorate over Shewa and Tigray and thence, they argued, over all Ethiopia). “Heniri Addisu” was present at Yohannes IV's last great military victory, against a poorly-equipped Italian army at the Battle of Adi Ugri, and personified Palmera's active ties into the wider net of the Anglo-Russian Entente. When Yohannes IV died in 1907, it was his faithful Dejazmach who rallied the cause of his chosen successor, Ras Mengesha Yohannes, and served as a key general in the Successor War—again with Russian aid—to help him win the throne and keep Ethiopia unified as Yohannes V*.

(* The drama of the Italian invasion parallels history, with the attempt at conquest faring even more poorly than in OTL, which is why they get stopped at Adi Ugri instead of Adwa further inland. The Successor War is the product of the questionable legitimacy of Yohannes IV's heir, an issue that ultimately sunk his claim amid widespread revolt after Yohannes IV's actual death IOTL.)

Such dramas convinced the Touladi that sooner or later, Palmera would be called upon to play a direct military role in theatres far afield from the Caribbean, and that she had to modernize and industrialize her still largely-agrarian economy to be able to live up to her “lion's cub” aspirations. Many of the Asian “coolie” workers and convict labourers of the era found themselves working on factory floors, for a small but rapidly-growing sector of the economy that was dedicated to the manufacture of war materials.

As the crises at the centre stage of history built toward the coming conflagration, though, other less widely-known pressures were building on the home front, forces that would be unleashed by the era of the Great War to change Palmey society forever.

1. The Birth of Noireism: As Black immigration from abroad continued to accelerate, a muted discontent was building with the status quo of Palmey politics. The United Freedom Congress remained the instrument of a largely White, Latino and Creole elite whose few Black members in Parliament were largely perceived to be token window-dressing and who—while professing the cause of universal freedom—still functionally tended to look down on the “Gitcheys,” as the Black working class came to be known. Granted, it was not a kind of hostility remotely comparable to the entrenched and vicious institutional hostility of Jim Crow, but there was still a kind of glass-ceiling effect on Black Palmeys, especially in the political realm where the interlocking “funny-handshake brigades” of Prince Hall and English Freemasonry called the shots**. It was a proverbial fact of life... and an increasingly resented one.

(** Prince Hall Masonry was founded IOTL, and in this timeline too, as a Black-friendly alternative to White Masonry which would not countenance Black members. It dominated Liberian politics of our timeline in a parallel fashion to the way it dominates Palmey politics in this one, although the Palmey version is disproportionately ruled by Creoles. English Freemasonry remains exclusively White.)

DuBois' Chicuchatty Movement railed against this “Hacktey-Lanney elitism” (“Hacktey” signified liberal nationalist Whites) from time to time, as would Booker T. Washington—another activist and educator who remained determinedly and defiantly American***—after his visits to the country (which he nevertheless hailed as a “remarkable achievement”). But the really potent opposition would come from Palmey disciples of the groundbreaking Haitian anthropologist Anténor Firmin, whose seminal On the Equality of Human Races in 1885 was a great blast of the trumpet against the noxious so-called “scientific racism” of Comte de Gobineau, and became a commonly-seen volume in the hands of Palmey students. It shaped a generation of Black Nationalists in Palmera in ways that would not be fully appreciated until much later.

(*** Booker T. Washington is of course a very famous figure of American history. Here, with a portion of the African-American population beginning to drain out into Palmera, his historical profile is somewhat ironically enhanced. Even more wealthy White liberals feel comfortable supporting him as the beginning stages of the Great Migration out of the Southern states cut down on African-American migration into the North; it means that Black liberation remains a theoretical and abstract proposition for many of them, devoid of actual real-world interaction with Black people and the various fears, insecurities and misbehaviours attending real-life contact.)

Firmin was possessed of some then-radical notions. He pioneered the integration of studies of race with physical anthropology, and his was the first full throated academic defense of the proposition that traditional African religions like “voodoo” were not “superstition” or “witchcraft” but fully functional religions in their own right, with their own theology and moral framework and that were entitled to considerations absolutely equal to those of Christianity or any of the other “great faiths.” He was a formative influence on the great academician Cato Gray**** at the Hillsborough Institute, who founded the Palmey tradition of African Studies in the early Twentieth Century and tutored a generation of young nationalist minds; among them one Marcus Garvey, who attended his classes on a “support and elevation grant” from 1907 through 1910.

(**** Anténor Firmin's pioneering influence is as in OTL, except that it now has an added and much more prominent stage on which to play out. Cato Gray is a fictional figure but an earlier Palmey counterpart of IOTL historical figures like Melville Herskowitz – of whom an unnamed analogue will still exist in this timeline – who pioneered African Studies in our history. Garvey was a self-taught activist with little formal education IOTL; here he becomes a student activist.)

Figures like Firmin and Gray had a powerful influence on the Dustie youth of the era. The first Palmeran Equal Rights Leagues began to appear in the wake of the 1908 crushing of the Droverist movement. They acknowledged Ulysses Newbold's mistakes and those of his followers and they denounced socialism themselves, at least formally, but they continued to support trade unionism in their own way and even more significantly began to push for unrestricted access to the franchise—condemning in very strong terms what they were beginning to frankly call the Lanney establishment's racism—an effort that became a powerful part of the political arsenal of the Liberty & Justice Party to which most of them adhered. One such PERLer was a young Horace Cayton*****, who would go on to play an iconic role in the country's politics.

(***** Horace Cayton is technically a historical figure, but he's different enough here that he should effectively be considered an analogue. I can't resist the wonderful ring of the name, though.)

It was the beginning of a Dustie mass movement called noireism, which would have profound effects on the culture and politics of the Union. Noireism was the rallying cry of not a few great novelists and poets of the early Twentieth Century, and inspired foundational works of fiction like Black Empire, an epic in its scope but a subtle and archly critical disquisition on Palmera's “secondary empire” and her pretensions to being the “Black Zion” by the novelist, poet, and one day Executive Magistrate Shadrack Cromwell******.

(****** OTL's Black Empire was a tongue-in-cheek pulp novel from a much later era by African-American conservative George Schuyler, lampooning the hypocrisies of the Black nationalism of his day [but also betraying a certain sympathy he may not have intended]. The fictional Shadrack Cromwell's effort shares the title but little else, it's a very different and more literary effort along the lines of someone like Zorah Neale Hurston. Noireism is an IOTL phenomenon that will exist in the “Harlem Renaissance” of this timeline too as the American counterpart of négritude.)

It was also the beginning of other, less salutary phenomena; for nationalism, as ever, had a dark side. Some disciples of Firmin were counted among the founders of the Nono Nemo Society (the “Godfather Nobody Society”), the self-appointed heirs of the Buffalo Soldiers of yore. It was a clandestine militia organization—in some opinions an outright terrorist organization—which took upon itself the responsibility of policing the Sutchey community in the wake of the bloody 1908 riots by the Free Workers' Parties, and which quickly accrued a radical following dedicated not just to promoting the rights of Black workers and political figures, but also aggressively terrorizing anyone they deemed not a part of the “true Black Zion,” among them Jews, Hindus, Muslims, Sutcheys, feminists and socialists of every description.

The “Nemoists,” prone to dressing in red robes inspired by African secret societies—and who infamously took to re-enacting the scandalous ritual murders that had bedevilled the Union Mercantile Company's operations overseas in Montserrado—quickly grew into a menacing plague that required a response from law enforcement+. After their early first flowering they seemed, by 1912, to have been driven back into the shadows after aggressive operations by the Secret Service, the Toneys and various police departments working in concert with both. But they had powerful connections and protectors, and their apparent eclipse concealed a base of support that continued to be dedicated to their mission, and that would come to exert a baleful influence across the Caribbean.

(+ Ritual murder was and is a real perennial IOTL issue in Liberia, of which “Montserrado” is the timeline's analogue. The red robes of the African secret societies herein mentioned do in fact look exactly like Klan robes save for the colour, and there are some theories IOTL that the Klan actually borrowed the trope – rather ironically – from Black secret societies. The “Nemoists” are of course the Palmey counterpart of the Klan.)

Both the light and dark sides of the new noireist nationalism would have their day. But other forces were gathering, too, and preparing to show themselves on the stage of history.

2. Peanuts, Herbs & Religious Ferment: The Shakers—the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing—were a famous self-sufficient artisan movement of millenarian Christians who practised celibacy and frequently provided shelter and upbringings for orphans. Originally an American phenomenon, the Shaker communities of the United States began to die out with the post-Civil War burgeoning of industry and the advent of Federal laws that forbade control of adoption by religious groups.

The Black Shaker communities founded in Palmera in the 1840s – during the group's “Era of Manifestations,” their golden age of expansion and conversion – continued, however, to thrive and to proliferate through the Caribbean, especially the British Caribbean, focused on orchard agriculture and the growth of medicinal herbs. They were a respected but very small feature of the religious landscape; but by the late 19th and early 20th centuries these communities were becoming the nuclei of new religious movements that would take on a far larger place in the life and politics of Palmera and the Caribbean.

There were three parallel kinds of ferment at work. The first had to do with the legal, technological and commercial landscape; the second with questions of race, empire and colonialism and the search for just responses to the ills of the day; the third with questions of sacred inspiration and the emergence of fresh prophets and exotic religious ideas. All of these things were at work in religion all across the Caribbean, of course, but the relative prosperity and self-sufficiency of the Shaker communities gave them a unique (if miniature) stage on which to play out.

The famous Shaker village of New Gilead, in Santa Rosa county, was one such stage. The congregation of New Gilead carried out the original Shaker mission and theology faithfully, and made a tidy profit in their small citrus orchard. But a citrus tariff introduced in Washington to shore up the rising California citrus industry in the 1860s put pressure on their business from early on – it was the kind of headwind that favoured the growth of large producers – and when the “great freeze” of the early Nineties wiped out a year's worth of crops, some of the New Gilead Shakers made the decision to move south, where sunnier climes might obviate the dangers of sudden frosts. Those who remained worked to diversify and became early students of the famous botanist and “father of the peanut industry” George Washington Carver*, the head of Agriculture at the Hillsborough Institute. Several peanut sauce, dip and pesto recipes from the village in turn became staple products of the emerging Carver & Caldwell food products empire, with royalty payments on the products derived from those recipes becoming a major source of the village's income.

(* Much like the historical George Washington Carver, except he strikes out for Palmera instead of the Tuskegee Institute as he did in our timeline. Carver's work in crop diversification, farmer education and the many possible uses of the peanut is as in OTL, except that in Palmera he is also able to derive some profit from his inventions. Carver & Caldwell is a company he founds in partnership with a fictional Palmey counterpart, capitalized by John Merrick's brokerage in Daltonville.)

By 1914, New Gilead had found fresh prosperity. The village even sported its own Patterson** motor wagon. Even in the early stages of this process, village fathers like Esek Dyer wrote of their worries that entering onto this larger stage of investment and profit could corrupt the community's spiritual foundations; a concern that in some views was ultimately borne out, for arguably New Gilead's spiritual prestige began to deteriorate from this point even as its material prosperity grew. The emigrants from New Gilead, meanwhile, encountered far different temptations and challenges.

(** C.R. Patterson was an African-American pioneer in the automotive industry in the late 19th century IOTL. Here he has left a small Patterson Motor Company of his own, being run by his son Taliaferro “Tally” Patterson – a fictional counterpart of his IOTL son Frederick. The Patterson name will be to Palmera's small but doughty motor car industry what the Ford name is to the far larger American one.)

One group of New Gilead emigrants wound up purchasing land in Jamaica and founding the village of Revelation in Portland parish in 1896. They were unpleasantly surprised by the politics of the country they arrived in – a place where colour prejudice and racism were vastly more prominent and blatant than in Palmera – and elected not only to be farmers (they started out farming hemp and marijuana, which were still internationally legal crops), but to become a centre of education and resistance for Black Jamaicans.

It was a mission that triggered a theological transformation, for the pioneers of Revelation developed an interest in other kinds of Christianity than Shakerism – in particular that of Ethiopian Orthodox Christianity, for the Ethiopian battle against colonialism was capturing the Black imagination – and began to lose their rigidity about celibacy, owing to the relatively remote character of their community. Revelation would eventually become the focal point of a new religion, Yohannism***, that combined Shakerism, Orthodoxy, a transcendental Black nationalism and a commitment to pacifistic virtue, and what some other groups thought was an idolatrous “worship” of the person of Emperor Yohannes V and his line. The pieces of this new faith were already growing visible by 1914.

(*** Ras Mengesha Yohannes, a.k.a. Yohannes V, takes Ras Tafari Makonnen's place as an inspiration for anti-colonial and anti-Eurocentric sentiment in this timeline. The new faith's Shaker roots and inspiration makes it different in many details from Rastafarianism, but it is this timeline's analogue.)

A stranger journey yet was in store for the group of New Gilead emigrants led by Sawney Hustus, who later took the name Solomon ben Solomon. Sawney was a strange young man, a visionary in the true sense who experienced powerful sacred ecstasies, received visits from angels of God and saw visions of the future. He was a prophet, in other words, and one around whom a fresh movement very different from Shakerism – which he soon came to abjure as an error – began to accrue when he arrived in Eleutheria.

Some of Hustus' message was about clear ills of the day: the modernizing world and the way it alienated men from Biblical values, the growing clouds of war on the horizon which would be a mechanized and “Satanic” war more destructive than ever before, the need for a return to simplicity and virtue and a wholesome vegetarian diet. Other parts of it made the authorities nervous: after a few years in Eleutheria he began to proclaim that Palmera was the true Israel, that white skin was the mark of Cain, that polygamy was the natural state of marriage, that the Tribulation had already begun and the anti-Christ was upon the world and that he and his followers were preparing to lead “righteous spiritual combat” against him. His followers began to dress in white robes and turbans and call themselves the Temple, and he finally took the name Solomon ben Solomon in 1902.

He was regarded as an eccentric madman and grifter by most of those outside his religion; but it was his refusal to pay taxes on the commercial endeavours of his followers that eventually led the authorities to attempt to arrest him. He fled to British Guiana in 1904 where he and his followers settled at the town of Spring Garden, comprising what they officially called the Israelite Church of the Tribulation. The Church wouldn't remain in isolation forever, and continued to attract youth from across the Caribbean during the years leading up to the Great War****.

(**** This group is the inspiration for the cult that appears in the Phineas Plumb novels – although fictionalized in that “Plumb” back-dates them to coincide with the Jamaica Exhibition – and is basically the Palmey answer to Mormonism, reflecting many of the same obsessions but from a Black perspective as the Latter Day Saints movement. They are also a nod to the Black Hebrew Israelites of OTL – who traced their earliest foundations to Kansas in 1896 – to which they are a closely parallel phenomenon. The Tribulationists are not the only group of Israelites in Palmera but they will eventually become the most prominent, even as their religion mellows from its early pattern of extremism.)

Religion in general was going through the confrontation with modernity that bedevilled these three very different stories originating in New Gilead. These confrontations, anxieties, and passions—and in some cases these specific groups—would come to play an enormous role in what followed.

3. Reach for the Skies (Anarchism, Feminism & Solidarity): Droverism, the Palmey variant of socialism, had always had different wings—a “right wing” that despite its critique of property and slavery was proud of its gradualism and pacifism and worked to set an example that would encourage change “in collaborative fashion” with the power centres of society, and a “left wing” (much smaller) that didn't hesitate to advocate strike actions or even violence. Leadership of both wings found themselves imprisoned or exiled alongside the questionably-socialist Free Workers' Party agitators in the Forsyth government's infamous crackdown of 1908 (the so-called July Crisis, later nicknamed the “Bolt From Above”), a uniformity of fate that discredited the last vestiges of the “collaborative” approach and began to transform and energise a new progressive generation. The momentum of the future belonged to this new generation of activists—especially student activists—who drew their inspirations from more radical doctrines, and in the years leading up to the Great War their most visible and rock-ribbed representatives would be feminist activists.

Feminism already had a long and storied history in Palmera. The “widows and spinsters” provision that gave a subset of women the vote early in the Home Rule era didn't happen by itself; it had been tirelessly pressed for as a kind of transitional demand by the Interfaith Christian Women's Society under the leadership of Oronooke Devon, precursors of the Allied Mothers of the Nation. The ICWS also pressed for women's rights to property and general suffrage and founded several famous women's colleges, including the Etonia College where generations of famous women were educated. The Allied Mothers of the Nation, founded in the 1880s, had pressed the causes of anti-racism, anti-imperialism and the rights of working women, and counted among their members such famous figures as Joanna Champlin – the so-called “Bethlehem Nightingale” who revolutionized battlefield medicine – and Mina Knowland, who championed co-education of men and women and became the first woman enrolled at Frankham College in 1886. It was by her example and arguments and those of women like her that the Hillsborough Institute had a “women's annex” from the day it opened its doors.

The basic framework of Palmey feminism, however, had hitherto mostly been within the context of nationalism and religion, and had conspicuously exploited certain “traditional” roles of women to make its gains (the name “Allied Mothers of the Nation” spoke for itself in this regard). It had been only imperfectly integrated with the socialism of the Drovers, which had been a manly enterprise—and though it had supported certain causes in common with the feminists, it had in practice been an inconsistent ally—whose male leadership had looked distinctly askance at foreign female anarchists like Emma Goldman. The new feminism began to challenge these frameworks, to seek new territory, to reject the relative parochialism of Droverism and to take up new causes. Its most famous representatives were a group of women who graduated from Frankham College in or just after the year of the July Crisis; they would go on to be called the Frankham Five* and would be heroines to men and women alike on the Palmey left in the decades to come.

(* The “Frankham Five” are all fictional figures, but some of them are analogues of historical personages, or their ideological commitments sometimes analogues of historical movements.)

The Frankham Five represented the full spectrum of ideologies that would come to identify the new left:

  • Rebekah Halder and Violet Grant came from radically different backgrounds: Halder was the daughter of a moderately wealthy Jewish family who had done charitable work for the poor through her faith—though notably without preaching—before attending university, while Grant came of Sutchey stock from the meanest of Daltonville's mean streets. Both were anarchists, disciples of Bakunin and Goldman, and ardent internationalists who consistently championed women's rights to birth control, women's freedom from the “slave roles of Wife and Mother” more generally, supported the rights of working people in general and particularly of working women—specifically including sex workers—criticized the violence of state power, convict labour and “coolie-ism,” regarded cross-racial solidarity as a necessity of justice, and rejected the “beauty industry” and the violence of capitalist fashion on women's bodies (they pointedly dressed in men's clothes to underscore this criticism). They were also an openly lesbian couple who could fairly be called the country's first gay rights activists, or at least its first gay icons**.
(** They're comparable to figures from OTL like Emma Goldman and Audre Lorde – though Lorde hails from a later time period in our history, and the appearance of figures similar to her this early reflects the foundational achievements of Palmey feminists, who have had access to considerably more privilege in this timeline. Fair cop: there's also a bit of autobiographical insertion here, because the couple is based more than a little on a couple I personally know. But you can bracket that out if you prefer using the prior rationales.)

  • Benebah “Bennie” Kelty hailed from one of Palmera's countless thousands of small hamlets, the daughter of rice farmers, and advocated a specifically Black internationalist anarchism tailored to the concerns of Black people in Palmera and across the world. She shared many of Halder's and Grant's beliefs—though not all of them, once remarking that she thought the pair sometimes crossed the line into being overtly hostile to men (“Although,” she added wryly, “Lord knows that men have often enough given them cause”)—and often joined them in the forefront of anarchist organizing. In later years she was a pen pal of noted British left feminist Cybele Pankhurst*** and would invite her several times to speak in Palmera.
(*** Cybele Pankhurst is an analogue of the famous feminist Sylvia Pankhurst from this era. Kelty's “Black anarchism” is similar to a movement that found its voice in a later period of American history IOTL.)

  • Nelly Coleman was a Dustie, the mixed Cherokee and African-American daughter of a Texas sharecropper who had made the arduous, dangerous trek to Palmera in a small boat with the aid of his local Palmyran Friendship Society in the 1890s, determined that his children would not grow up attending segregated schools****. She was naturally brilliant and something of a child prodigy, just seventeen years of age when she graduated from Frankham in 1909; but though she studied law at her father's behest, her true passion was for flying. She would become the first woman in Palmera to hold a pilot's license, attaining celebrity as a civilian aviator and show flyer as early as 1912, and was the motive force in organizing the first Palmeran Women's Aviator Association. Influenced by Marxism, although she would never actually describe herself as a Marxist, she was fiercely pro-union, anti-imperialist and anti-war, and would go on to become a major figure in the union solidarity movement and a famous advocate of the Industrial Workers of the World—nicknamed “Wobbly Nell”— who began to make inroads in Palmera as the country's industrial infrastructure accelerated.

(**** In her background and her achievements as an aviator, she's an analogue of Bessie Coleman, the first African-American female aviator in our timeline, though “Wobbly Nell” is very different in many ways and will enjoy both a longer lifespan and a higher profile.)

  • Emma Shandy was the most committed Marxist of the group and, having witnessed how harsh the “coolie labour” section of the country's agricultural system could be firsthand—her father came to the country as an indentured worker in the 1880s and served in the National Militia Service during the Spanish Crisis in 1897*****—was an ardent advocate of the collectivization of agriculture and how collective community could transform the national soul. Despite her Marxism, she rejected Karl Marx's more authoritarian ideas and in some ways was the most “traditionalist” of the Frankham Five, proud of what Palmera had achieved in the cause of Black liberation (her mother was a former sharecropper who had fled the rise of Jim Crow), committed to the freedom Palmera promised for all races and dedicated to making that freedom fuller and fairer for all. She famously said “I do love Jack, for all his faults; I just want him to love all of his children back.”****** She was ultimately convinced that socialism could be reconciled with the mission of the Black Zion and she would become a pioneer of model collective communities in much the same way Ulysses Newbold had been in his day.

(***** The Spanish Crisis refers to an international crisis in 1897—one of the few grand actions of the Belle Epoque where our spy novelist “Phineas Plumb” did not insert himself—where the Spanish government was caught by Palmera's Secret Service trying to stir up rebellion in Cuba. Palmera informed the American government, which mounted a blockade of Spanish ships to the island and eventually compelled Spain to relinquish her remaining holdings in the Caribbean, as well as the Philippines, in order to avoid all-out-war.)

(****** “Jack” is a reference to Jack Freedom, a kind of symbol of the national soul not unlike Uncle Sam in the United States or John Bull in England; this archetype of “freedom's Union” was an ethnically-indeterminate and muscular young pioneer--usually depicted wielding or holding either a hammer, a machete or a rifle--who reflected the Creole elite's vision of the country's strengths. Shandy is here advocating a movement analogous to the kibbutz movement of our history.)

The Five were all close friends and in the early years of their activism and fame would support each others' efforts unstintingly. They were not the only women of their kind, just the most famous examples of a left that was rising swiftly from the ashes of the Droverist movement to make its own mark on society. At this early stage their full impact was a long way from being felt, and though they were already the subjects of vociferous controversy, they were arguably not taken too seriously yet by Palmey officialdom--perhaps partly on account of their sex--which left them fairly free to operate until the time the Great War came lurching over the horizon.
 
Last edited:
This iS @CeeJay post 35 above:

{Edit--Note it was in response to the original version, which had a lot added to it later, some in response to this post of mine. I will make no attempt to update my own response, just indicating here why it might often seem mystifying and overly limited in scope}.
It seems that some dynamic completely crushes the Drovers; this frankly strikes me as an odd thing.

To be sure, it is quite possible that Socialism would come to be seen as a "whites-only" movement; I gather Jack London OTL was a popular proponent of just such a view; an intersection of the widespread though mindless acceptance of de Gobineauist "scientific racism" suitably generalized for the polynational USA (it would not do to "refine" the alleged science of racism to focus on one European people as the perfected ones for someone seeking broad appeal in an America where intermarriages between all sorts of generically "white" looking people were the norm, but to argue that Europeans of the whiter hues from farther north and west in Europe were a specially gifted people--IIRC the claim for "Anglo-Saxons" was that they were especially good, allegedly, at democratic self-government--would serve well) with populist Rights-of-Man (here modified to be "Responsibly self-governing White Men like ourselves) radicalism to address the manifest injustices of capitalism, and voila, Socialism understood to be for whites only, with the aimed-for Socialist Utopia becoming a "gardening state" that excludes the racially unfit. It is possible that if one polled the loyal core of OTL American socialist movements one would find that at least a majority if not almost all members had some degree of exclusionary racism, deeming African, Native American and Asian membership undesirable and counterproductive. Or maybe not, I certainly don't wish to slander people who may in fact have included those who did rise above prevailing racist conventional thinking! But of course such racism was conventional OTL and it would be risky for any individuals blessed with skepticism and positive desires for bridge-building and debunking conventional wisdom to stick their necks out. OTL perhaps a forthright doctrine against racism might have to wait for the Bolsheviks and the Third International.

Given conventional thinking about race prevailing among socialists broadly, even say just in the USA, it would be easy for a dynamic to arise that undermines and leads to the total crushing of the Palmeran Drovers. They would lack support from the Euro-American Second International (and indeed the Drovers were an older movement than 1848 and might have themselves haughtily rejected the pretensions of jonny-come-lately Euro-radicals, which further isolates them) and with race being the salient factor both setting Palmera apart internationally, within the Empire and developing Commonwealth, and across the highly charged US border, as well as strongly polarizing within Palmera as a whole, their whole class-based focus might seem increasingly irrelevant and quaint, and yet dangerous enough to arouse serious animosity. The body of potential recruits would be siphoned off to more racially focused movements, leaving them weak and exposed for a decisive quashing.

The existence of Palmera as someplace black folk in the USA can be encouraged or forced to migrate to might also act as a solvent of what solidarity with African-Americans the OTL US far left had; instead of finding a place for them in the movement and envisioned post-revolutionary Utopia, people who came to be more or less friends of neighbors of color OTL might be shut down or shunted to such ethnic cleansing positions.

I gather that this is the scenario we are to imagine has been played out in the ATL history; Drovers are dead and gone now.

However, I am romantic enough to believe that in every phase of the ascendency of racist ideology in modern Euro-Atlantic history, there have been dissenters and naysayers enough to somewhat redeem our souls, and that among socialists and other progressive thinkers, such views were more welcome, or anyway less unwelcome, than in the populace as a whole. I also think that insofar as Noireism tends to undermine the Drovers, it also would, at least in certain strata of the Noireists, tend to assimilate socialist aspects--akin to the Slavists of Russia, who might be categorized as an essentially reactionary and nationalist movement, quite a few would assert that due to special Slav characteristics, communalism was more appropriate to them, no doubt some Noireists are going to suggest that the brown folk of Palmera can enjoy success through collectivism that white people would fail at.

Thus, I would foresee two viable and not quite crushable branches of Palmey Socialism, with at least one of them in some solidarity with at least some US Socialists. The Noireist-Drovers would purge themselves of any cooperation with whites--which of course means setting themselves against a significant population in Palmera, depending on whether the line is set by "one drop rule" or somewhere in the spectrum of levels of intermarriage more nuanced race-conscious societies so nicely perceive. People who can pass for pure white in Palmera might be relatively few, but of course Palmera's defense against Yankee conquest is her allegiance to the British Crown; militant Noireism (whether compounded with socialism or the more reactionary type you have described) is an insult to the Crown and Britain in general, obviously. So I suppose the intersection of "Radical Noireist" and "Drover" sets might work out to be near empty.

But within the ranks of Noireists, especially given the geopolitical realities of a world ruled by white people, a certain acerbic contempt for the moral pretensions of white supremacists would tend to be diluted in a positive extolling of the positive virtues of Africans. (And will Noireists reach out to other non-whites--the Natives of Palmera (largely, at least some famous OTL tribes, admixed with Africans anyway) and more crucially, the new underclasses of East Indian coolie workers? I would think the non-socialist groups you have described would keep their distance from the Indians--but what about leftist Noireists, if that is not to be a contradiction in terms?)

Meanwhile, at least a wing of Drovers seem likely to me to make contact with the Euro-American developing schools of radical socialism, Marxist and otherwise, and develop a bastion of anti-racist universal humanitarian solidarity, seeking allies among all poor and oppressed persons of all colors, denouncing the divisiveness of race as both inhumane and unscientific. And in so doing make contact with US socialists who might, despite the divide and rule effect of Palmera seeming to be an escape valve for the pressures to solidarity, actually be stronger in the ATL. You've already remarked how moderates like Booker T Washington are more popular among semi-enlightend US whites who are more comfortable with notions of Black equality at a distance removed from themselves. I would think that in the ATL, there would be similar expansion of interracial equality notions among radical leftist whites who anticipate their on-paper equal black brothers to live far away. And that this greater respectability of the principle of interracial equality and harmony at a distance would open the door for more whites, particularly radicals already apt to critique, debunk and oppose the strictures of conventional society, to discover true interpersonal equality and solidarity with actual blacks they know, and form the nucleus of a radical egalitarianism of common action.

After all, I doubt very much that the escape valve of emigration to Palmera is really that wide open for all US African-Americans seeking to escape local oppression. I'd be pretty sure that, in the face of an influx of Buffalo Soldiers and other Exodusters, Palmey and British authorities would be somewhat alarmed and take measures to restrict immigration. Possibly not the strongest they could take because perhaps US Exodusters could to a great extent substitute for East Indian coolies. Most US Afro-Americans would be former plantation or house slaves, and most of the former not trained for or experienced in advanced industrial jobs; they'd be seeking land, and if they can't get land of their own, hiring out as farm workers. A certain level of influx would be welcome enough, but you've stressed that ATL Palmera is not more productive than OTL Florida, and indeed is a bit smaller lacking the western panhandle. (Not that that land was heavily settled OTL until the tourist booms of the later 20th century, and it remains relatively sparsely settled to this day except right on the beaches). At some point Palmera, sheltering behind British power, will start to restrict passage over the borders--indeed in the ATL, the long northern border, and short Apalachicola River west border, must have been quite heavily guarded from 1814 to 1860.

Ironically I believe Palmera was pretty safe from Confederate invasion designs, since the Confederacy sought British support against the Union; invading Palmera, or even attempting raids to recapture slaves, would tend to alienate such hopes after all; Georgia would have put on a tight leash against their close-up impatience. By the time the Emancipation Proclamation undermined what degree of support for the CSA existed in London--and surely despite some probable ambivalence, Palmera's voice within the colonial system would tend to oppose the secessionists and even before EP have some slight preference for Lincoln and the Union--it would be too late for schemes of conquest, for the Confederate forces would be decimated and bogged down, while a firmly pro-Union Palmera would reinforce Union strength and be reinforced by flanking Union early naval conquests. Though I do wonder if the OTL strategy of working around to attack New Orleans and other key Confederate Gulf Coast ports would have been feasible in the early days when British policy teetered and was not friendly to the Union, and thus landing anywhere between Savannah GA and St. Andrews Bay in ATL southeast Alabama would be out of the question--could Union Navy ships travel that whole long haul, even assuming the British would not tolerate Confederate blocking fleets and squadrons loitering along the way, and wait for landfall until they got all the way to the OTL location of Panama City? (Which would be somewhat developed as the easternmost port not compromised by a British holding right across a small river, but surely not named PC--St Andrews would be the name of the port town I would guess). I think it probably could be done but it makes a big change from OTL. After the Emancipation Proclamation, of course, it should be possible, if not for US commissioned warships, then for merchants and perhaps privateer commerce raiders keeping a low profile, to put in to Palmeran ports for shelter or to purchase supplies, and of course the merchants could serve as lighters to bring items to the USN ships at sea just over the horizon. Whereas by that point Confederate shipping, no matter how innocuously civil, would be quite unwelcome--even if authorities permitted them to put in without seizing them, they might find the colored folk they might wish to trade with mighty unfriendly and amazingly disinclined to offer a fair deal, not to mention the danger of unruly hooligan gangs attacking their craft in the dead of night and remarkably cool civil authorities showing little interest in their troubles. To the bitter end, Confederate and even Georgian hotheads would know it would be very dangerous to annoy the Palmeys, even if they witness them becoming quite keen to cooperate with Yankee schemes to transit goods over land where convenient.

Right up to 1860 though, the northern and western borders would have been very hot places, because of the all the Georgian and Alabama fugitive slaves seeking refuge. The British authorities would be reluctant to betray British anti-slavery principles to return any fugitives making it to their side, and the Palmeys recruited for local militia work would be downright hostile to the idea--and surely it would be they, rather than Britons, doing most of the border patrolling. They also would not be adverse to shooting slave catchers to kill, and perfectly within their rights as British subjects defending the borders. Therefore the US side would also be built up, to supply garrisons of slave-catching patrollers seeking to catch them before reaching the safety of the border. Nominally British and US armed forces would be almost literally face to face, no doubt every year someone on each side being fatally shot by the other; the only reason peace would prevail with the USA would be high level resolution in both Washington and London not to go to war--a resolution that would be sorely tested on both sides during the 1847 crisis. There would be little love lost, and probably as little trade as between OTL East and West Germany during the Cold War. Something between the Berlin Wall and Maginot/Siegfried Lines would exist right up to the Emancipation Proclamation, and even then, as Union forces fought their way to control the southern Georgia border, I don't think the Palmeran side of the line would be demilitarized right away. Indeed both sides might tacitly agree that while saving a lot of money on the massive works would be mutually beneficial, neither really wants the border to become wide open; much tighter border control than between the USA and Canada would no doubt persist for decades, and perhaps indefinitely. Every cooling shift in the wind in US/British relations would lead to a surge of deferred maintenance and reinforcements, and tightening restrictions on travel in either direction. Trade would still be a matter of a few closely watched portals trading in mutually agreed upon mass goods, very little local retail would happen.

And so, I suspect that Palmeran authorities, with the consent of broad majorities in the colony, would tighten up on the infiltration of US African-Americans. Individuals with remarkable credentials--high ranking non-coms or famous Civil War soldiers perhaps, people with special skills--might be grudgingly admitted, probably on conditions of serving the Crown in the military or as experts in industrial development (these too might be put in uniform, both to control them and give them a bit of authority their US origins might otherwise see undermined by prejudice).

But on the whole I would be surprised if as many as half of the OTL black folk who moved out of the Deep South to northern or western greener pastures as they hoped to find manage to move to Palmera instead. Have you run the numbers, and if so, how close would the entire US migration from former plantation zones to the northern cities that happened OTL come to swamping Palmera utterly if they were all allowed to move south instead? I think it would be so so big, and if anything, bigger than OTL if not restricted, that both Britain and the whole set of previously settled locals would fear losing political control and otherwise being displaced.

Thus, although emigration to US northern industrial cities would indeed be less than OTL, I'm pretty sure it has to happen at least to half the OTL extent anyway. Northern ghettos like Harlem are going to be established.

Meanwhile the South is going to be leached of somewhat more emigrants than OTL. This might improve the bargaining position of some of the African-Americans who stay, perhaps causing regions known for relative leniency in Jim Crow restrictions OTL to become yet more conciliatory, perhaps going so far as to seriously enforce the illegality of Klan type terrorism, carry over more of the Reconstruction reforms, and become magnets for internal migration of black folk to bastions even deep in the South where they are safe and respected, greatly complicating the picture in the South generally. The more that sort of thing happens, the weaker the position of white supremacists elsewhere as the economics of sharecropper and other forms of racially polarized exploitation suffers due to people voting with their feet. To be sure, in reaction to this some districts might double down on terrorism; we might have a situation where within some states, bastions of relative liberalism allowing large numbers of African-Americans to vote and even mingle freely with white populations are counterbalanced by infamous hellholes of repression sending delegates to the state legislature and Congress determined to oppose these voices and if possible, smash their comfortable setup, with businessmen both locally in the South and up North torn between those seeking the profits of a sophisticated developed economy and others invested in repression.

Again, if such things happened, I think whatever additional darkness of raw racial terrorism is deepened by the conflict, it must also open up a wider space for those who denounce the whole American racial setup as unworthy of a shining light of democracy, and mix up radicals of all colors in greater solidarity against the power of capital.

In the USA, socialism in a broad sense had a wider and deeper presence than our modern retrospective view tends to see, coming and going in waves between the Civil War and World War I. And had a sort of twilight, with a lot of oxygen sucked up by the still more radical though not very numerous Third International Communists, but retaining a penumbra of the people against the rich with many other echoes, including Huey Long's (Southern!) Share the Wealth league, as well as yet other quaintly named movements creating a generally pinkish froth that tended to line up with FDR's New Deal in time. It wasn't until the Cold War, despite the occasional Red Scare, that the notion that the common people seizing economic as well as political rights, was successfully demonized enough to be disregarded, and even then diehard individuals remained quietly convinced that wealth should be opposed.

Now we are approaching the time frame of the Great War of OTL, which apparently is going to happen pretty much the same on a similar schedule, implying that the USA is liable to be drawn in on a pro-British side sooner or later. This was the great opportunity for the American right to deal a heavy blow to the popularity of socialism OTL, not yet a total knockout but setting the US far left up for final debacle in the early '50s. Similar dynamics doubtless exist in the British imperial system, and Palmera surely has plenty of local powers that be that want Droverism wiped out from all memory if possible.

But I'd think the Drovers have some allies too. There is the Labour Party in Britain itself; a party torn throughout its history with diverse currents and notions of just what being a working person's party should entail--self-improvement and bourgeois respectability versus radical class warfare being the general dividing line. There are American socialist movements, some of which were less racist than usual at the time OTL and some of these might go farther earlier and thus encourage Palmey Drovers to see them as allies.

I find it a bit strange that Palmey politics can remain largely confined to the whiter "tawneys" and other Janussaries, aware of their racial disability in the larger British society yet unwilling to be lumped in with the darker masses. That they should prevail early in the century (19th that is) is natural enough, being endorsed by concentrations of wealth and by British white patronage. But with Palmera's identity up against US slavocracy, and even very white Britons passionate about the illegitimacy of slavery, which to some if not a majority, implies the capability of British subjects of color to serve as equals to whites, sooner or later some "Tawney" with connections and credentials on the British side of things will also fall into sympathy with the darker skinned masses and combining impeccable credentials of service to the Crown with broad popularity lead a movement of general egalitarianism. Reaction or the mere swings of political pendula might follow such a period with one of racial regression, but I think once the floodgates are opened, Palmey politics cannot go back. Soon the way would be open for some Benito Juarez analog, a black man of the majority of the people, cultured enough and of demonstrated loyalty to the Crown (after all, who else is holding the Yankees at bay?) but, self-made and presentable at Parliament and Court though he may be, still a proper Gitchee black working man, to rise via democratic vote to a leading position in the colony. I would think this would happen in this colony long before 1914!

In this context, though a large number of well off individuals may share the general loathing of the rich for socialists, I think there would be too many people sympathetic to the basic cry for equality for the Drovers to be beaten and scattered to total irrelevance. Perhaps during the Great War, perhaps in the bitter years after when radicals are torn by the polarizing demands of the Third Internationalists versus the cry to seize respectable power by respectable means of the 2nd International Socialists. In Palmera of course another dividing line exists--to go with some kind of Noireism, whether to emphasize the goodness of the right mixes of non-white races with white (if any of that is allowed) or to demonize the wickedness of the pale folk, mixed in with leftist radicalism of various stripes. Or perhaps to denounce racism as such, to declare solidarity with the working masses of the USA and the Caribbean alike, as well as the working folk in factory, mines and fields back in Blighty--or if not them, then in Moscow and on the barricades across Red-torn Europe of 1919, in Italy, Hungary, Munich and Berlin, and marching with the Red Army to crush reaction in Poland.

I simply do not believe the Drovers, as a legacy for many parties at odds with one another if not as a single unified bloc, are going to be ready to be crushed out of existence and memory just yet. Maybe later, during the global Cold War. But at this time I would think that there would be at least as many Palmey Reds as there are Nomo Nemos. And more Palmey Labourites, in two wings, Noireist and anti-racist. It even seems unlikely to me the colonial regime can criminalize all of them; quite a few must be decorated war veterans after the war after all; others despite professions of a preference for the poor over the rich would be quite respectably wealthy personally; many would mute radical revolutionism in favor of Crown loyalty.

I basically like to think, in my romantic way, that bad things lead to worse and good things lead to better, and the existence of Palmera as a refuge for black folk is basically a good thing in my view. Therefore I would be both saddened and puzzled to see it more successfully accomplish repression than even the USA, or Imperial Germany.

Now for all I know, because I am quite ignorant of the details of cultural and political development in the colonial Caribbean in this period, that such efforts by colonial authorities were indeed successes and divide and rule of the diverse population enabled white authorities of the most conservative type to prevail, and that the left-wing parties they smashed were both scanty in numbers and quickly forgotten in favor of a mix of go-along-to-get-along submissives and crazy fascist thugs.

Since your outline may be more in line with what Caribbean history in general, perhaps I should shut up and go with it?

But I am disappointed to see the Drovers go without having ever made any kind of big splash first!
 
Last edited:
@Shevek23 -- thanks for those remarkably detailed thoughts. A couple of points:

1) No, the border is certainly not an unguarded border Canadian style. It isn't totally militarised or a Berlin Wall-style No-Man's Land, however, particular after the conflicts of the nineteenth century die down. Of course there are impassioned elements in the South who are maddened by Palmera's existence and by the idea of its draining away slave labour; but there are countervailing views even among White supremacists, besides which the Monroe Doctrine is in force and Washington itself has no particular designs on Palmera notwithstanding these tensions, so there's increasingly a limit to the extent to which the American government will let private or state militias dictate the border's character. There are still people doing business on both sides of the border, and the US is still unavoidably a major trading partner, so it's a situation of mixed traffic and law enforcement vigilance more similar to the border between the US and Mexico.

2) The "Hacktey-Lanney elitism" being denounced by the Noireists is not, despite what some of the coming generation of students are prone to thinking, completely inegalitarian. Imperfections aside, the "Black Zion" idea is more than just a slogan to most elements of Palmey society, certainly among the two dominant parties. People genuinely feel a duty, insofar as it's possible and particularly after having prevailed through all the struggles of the Nineteenth century, to be a welcoming home to Black settlers in a sense that's not terribly unlike what Israel felt about being a refuge for Jews. [In fact it occurs to me that the friction between Ashkenazi and Mizrahi in OTL Israel is a good guide to the nature of the friction between Lanney and Gitchey here.] So no, I do not see the Palmeys clamping down on African-American immigration any more than they would clamp down on it from elsewhere in the Caribbean; they need the population and the workers and making homes for such people is a core part of the national mission. Nor (saving the dispute with the Creeks and Seminoles) are they anywhere near the numbers yet that would create real land shortages. (But no, the entire Great Migration is not coming to Palmera and yes, I've crunched the numbers. I'll be dealing with that as the timeline progresses. :) )

2a) As for how it comes to be that the political elite largely exclude Blacks from the upper rungs of power as late as 1914, this parallels the patterns of similar elites in post-colonial Caribbean states and is reinforced by the elite need for leverage with White-dominated centres of foreign financial power. Blacks cannot entirely be excluded from office-holding, especially at the municipal level, and property and educational requirements for voting can't lock them out of the political process in the same way that these things would exclude them from voting in, say, Jamaica. In general the country is still a vastly better and safer place to be Black, and a place where Black citizens can own land and property and build legacies in a stable way... which eventually and inescapably will start to reshape the political landscape. Palmera will thus begin to fare better in this regard before too long, but old boys' networks can be very durable and adaptable and we are seeing that here; it would feel like wank to have it expire too quickly given how many such arrangements survived long into the 20th century in the Caribbean of OTL.​

3) The Drovers have basically suffered a collapse not unlike the early generation of US socialists, led by people like Eugene Debs, suffered during the repressions during WW1 IOTL (or like the Black Panther Party suffered under COINTELPRO). Their influence is still felt -- Palmera has a social welfare system that, while not quite "socialist," was certainly motivated by trying to preempt socialist appeal, and you'll note that early Noireism now embraces a vision of universal suffrage that was once a socialist demand -- so I would argue that they have very much had an impact. They're largely spent as a political and organizing force... but that doesn't mean socialism's story in Palmera is over, not by a long shot. There were and are many people who held sympathy with at least some of what the Drovers represented after all. (Why is Forsyth's crackdown so draconian? Aside from the same reasons businessmen have always hated socialism, there was also the fact that White revolution was still seen as an existential threat, and a real albeit completely unfair belief that socialists might either collaborate with or become unwitting tools of White extremists.)

There's much of what you discuss that's going to be the subject of further chapters in the timeline, especially the development of race relations and justice movements on both sides of the Palmera-American border, so I won't go into all that now. Thanks for the interesting points and the engagement. I am bearing in mind and cogitating on your ideas even if I haven't responded to them directly in this post.
 
Last edited:
Update to the Hinge of History Pt. 1. A note on religious developments. The third update will cover the flourishing of feminism and new solidarity movements.
 
Top