Ricardolindo
Banned
What if, in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1946-1947, Pakistan had taken the Kashmir Valley and India had taken Gilgit-Baltistan? I read this idea mentioned in another thread and there, it was believed, that, it would be much better for India, since Gilgit-Baltistan had, and, still, has a much smaller/lower population than the Kashmir Valley's, that would probably lead to a much more reduced insurgency. I agree. In addition, Gilgit-Baltistan is Shia and when Pakistan started anti-Shia policies in this timeline, any support for it, in Gilgit-Baltistan, would disappear. What are your thoughts?