WWII tunnel vision.Obviously, Britain tends to get an automatic assumption of superpower status for some reason. So does Japan.
On the other hand, Italy certainly had potential in spades, but nobody ever seems to believe that an Italian army is good for anything other than the triumphal march from Aida.
Obviously, Britain tends to get an automatic assumption of superpower status for some reason. So does Japan.
On the other hand, Italy certainly had potential in spades, but nobody ever seems to believe that an Italian army is good for anything other than the triumphal march from Aida.
I dunno; Italy, after all, is trapped in the Mediterranean.
I dunno; Italy, after all, is trapped in the Mediterranean.
Should Germany be included? If so, which way?
Shouldn't this be in the pre-1900 forum? We've already had the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth show up. If we have PODs going back to the Renaissance, we certainly could get, say, the house of Viscondi-Habsburg, rulers of Italy, Austria, most of the Balkans, N. Africa, Switzerland....
Germany? Well, if we're talking post-1900 PODs, _definitely_ overrated.
Where can we find a colony for the Scots where they can grow enough to offset their numerical disadvantage?)
???
<????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????>
Well, it can't get to America unless it passes through Gibraltar, no? Which is controlled by *Spain. And the Suez Canal, alas, seems unlikely.
Or better still Mexico. If it controlled the areas of America that there "stolen from it", ie Texas, California, Arizona, etc as well as overrunning Central America during the expulsion of the Spanish by the Nationalists. It could then roll on down the Andes as far south as Chile. That would get it most of the resources as well as a large population it would need to become a superpower. A mix of anti-Yankee (or Brazilian) nationalism plus the use of the Spanish language would keep it tied together.What about Argentina?
Well, with a ton of divergence, and an early PoD,
we might have seen a superpower Boer state.
At least that implies that they had
- built a single state early and maintained their independence,
- been more ambitious about their industrial prosperity,
- kept closer relations to various European countries
and, possibly, the USA.
Then they would have needed a lot of time,
to prosper economically and demoscopically.
So better start working early on the above.
But after all, around 1700 Boer opportunities do not look so much different for those of the 13 colonies ...
I was thinking a cut off point around 1800; maybe 1700, but since it covers both periods I thought I'd put it here.
What about Russia? Maybe not DoD's strange "Not really Russian if we have Manchuria and Turkey" Russia, but something similar. .
France, I think, gets underrated..