I mean, it's not that much more obtuse than "National Socialist German Workers Party".
As someone pointed out, the equivalent in the modern US would be someone calling their party the "Democratic Republican Liberal Conservative Party".
I mean, it's not that much more obtuse than "National Socialist German Workers Party".
As someone pointed out, the equivalent in the modern US would be someone calling their party the "Democratic Republican Liberal Conservative Party".
"Liberal conservatism" is actually a real ideology.I mean, the Canadian conservative party was called the Liberal-Conservative for quite a while, even after the other party called themselves the Liberal Party.
"Liberal conservatism" is actually a real ideology.
"Liberal conservatism" is actually a real ideology.
There's a quote by Rohm that explains it quite well. In 1934 he said something like "Adolf is a swine, now he only associates with bourgeois reactionary's. We've had the National revolution, now is time for the Socialist one." People forget that the early Nazi party did have a very strong 'left-wing' and for many people it was as much about anti-capitalism as anti-communism. Hitler was on the party's right-wing and willing to crush the party's left both with the destruction of Rohm/the SA and with the purge of the Strassers earlier.As someone pointed out, the equivalent in the modern US would be someone calling their party the "Democratic Republican Liberal Conservative Party".
MUSSOLINI
some who is concerned, i'm posting this intentionally early for The Red to take attention for this to create a POD for these countries. Essentially like MacGregor's The Union Forever.
I mean yeah, usually people who don't follow certain ideologies see them as the same thing. We call that "out-group homogeneity effect"I'm not an adherent of either but I can't see much difference between the two, asides from posturing.
I hope The Red could make all of these events occur, which would make later parts of TL fun and intense.
Because so far it has been both?What gave you the impression that I wanted this TL to be fun and intense?
Because so far it has been both?![]()
I mean yeah, usually people who don't follow certain ideologies see them as the same thing. We call that "out-group homogeneity effect"
Well, here's why i got that impression. I got that impression after seeing all of this TL is about Communism, etc... that's why. This impression i morphed into this idea: I would like to see if other Fascist regimes (the ones on Asia (Japan and Thailand), thanks to the status of never being a colony), some Latin American countries and not-colonized yet African (particularly Ethiopia, but also probably South Africa), Central Asian (Tibet, Mongolia, Tuva, Nepal and Bhutan), Middle east countries (Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen) and probably Ireland, Egypt, Morocco & Liberia got dragged into Comintern thanks to Hitler's antics, which could cause some of these non-communist states and communist states all joining Comintern, though not in the desire of these countries. I would like also to see if East European countries like Baltics, Finland, Balkans, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and northern European states (Denmark, Norway and Sweden) all joining Allies from the fear of communism. I am seeing that Mao Zedong would invite Japan and Soviets to help him gaining power in China and established PRC from it, and i am also seeing that Portugal would join WW2 in the side of Allies too. That's all of my ideas for now. I hope The Red would take this but partially if not all of them...What gave you the impression that I wanted this TL to be fun and intense?
probably also probably Ireland, Egypt, Morocco & Liberia got dragged into Comintern thanks to Hitler's antics, which could cause some of these non-communist states and communist states all joining Comintern, though not in the desire of these countries.
I actually meant that Adolf Hitler dragged them into Comintern bloc without getting them into communism actually. Really. I'm thinking that Adolf Hitler tries to woo them to join war on his side (Comintern), because thanks to his communist beliefs he thinks that these states, whatever it is communist or not would highly help him in his conquest to kick out "bourgeois, imperialists, capitalists" from their region. For example you can make Adolf Hitler try to woo Japan by manipulating the IJA's beliefs that all other Europeans like British and Americans are "bourgeois, imperialist, capitalists" and then... BAM! Fascist Japan declared war on America and joins Comintern! He could also make China communist by inviting Soviets and Japanese to help Mao Zedong take power in China and BAM! PRC formed. Is that the example? This could be helpful to you.I don't think Hitler will quite have the power to make random countries communist against their will, at least not in 1923, but I'll see what I can do.
We'll just have to wait and see. I don't really want to be told Reds whole plan for the rest of the story.I actually meant that Adolf Hitler dragged them into Comintern bloc without getting them into communism actually. Really. I'm thinking that Adolf Hitler tries to woo them to join war on his side (Comintern), because thanks to his communist beliefs he thinks that these states, whatever it is communist or not would highly help him in his conquest to kick out "bourgeois, imperialists, capitalists" from their region. For example you can make Adolf Hitler try to woo Japan by manipulating the IJA's beliefs that all other Europeans like British and Americans are "bourgeois, imperialist, capitalists" and then... BAM! Fascist Japan declared war on America and joins Comintern! He could also make China communist by inviting Soviets and Japanese to help Mao Zedong take power in China and BAM! PRC formed. Is that the example? This could be helpful to you.
So, are you sure that Adolf Hitler would do something on Japan, Thailand, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Ireland, Morocco, Ethiopia, Liberia, some Latin American states (i'll give you an example: Mexico), Yemen, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Nepal, Tibet, Mongolia, some British-controlled Middle east states like Jordan, Tunisia, Indian states and also South Africa? If you sure, then i would love it!
We'll have to see and wait on the first. Let's not immediately redeem Hitler by just making him left-wing, he's still god damn Hitler (and the historical work about interwar Germany being called "Bridging the Horseshoe" is also a red light)
Camps in terms of blocs of nations, I assume? When Hitler is involved, other camps might emerge too. Capitalist reeducation camps, perhaps?Thanks! We're still a while away from the Second World War but hopefully things will still be interesting up till then. What I will say is that we're very quickly approaching the moment where Hitler's antics are going to start affecting other countries. So if anyone was interested in seeing what camps might appear you won't have long to wait.