Where does Sanders stand on the Monarchy.
He's a republican.
Ah, looks like we're getting the Suez Crisis, or something quite like it, now. Granted, without the pressures of the Cold War and American influence over the Commonwealth, I doubt Egypt's capacity to actually seize and hold the canal.
Also looks like the New Liberal reforms to the House of Lords never occurred, given that the Lords are still able to outright veto legislation.
It's very common for Egypt to act like this. Just hasn't happened in awhile.
The House of Lords is reformed. This isn't an outright veto, they are simply throwing it back to the House because they object to the language that indicates Britain would cede border controls to Ireland in limited circumstances.
"How a Brighton Mum stopped a terror attack"
I'm intrigued. The IRA?
I love all of these side-headlines, it really adds to the immersion of it all. I've accidentally clicked on an article a number of times.
Indeed it's the IRA. They normally have some attack every month or so to varying degree of success.
I certainly don't want to pry, but do you have any 'black swan events' planned? Trump was definitely a black swan of sorts for instance, and it could be argued that he completely changed the 'direction of our timeline' as a result. Unless such an event has already happened, like the Soviet election of Geoff Regan's pipping of Bernie. But I guess I'm asking if there's going to be something 'out of the blue' that'd throw all your viewers off kilter?
In life, you don't exactly a giant warning sign one is coming.
“Fire and Fury: The Warpath of Bernie Sanders”
I see what you did there.
So Kanan, is it possible that you will do a wikibox for Nigeria? After all, they are a commonwealth member and they did fight in Burma until 2008, so I was curious.
Nigeria left the Commonwealth at the same time as Canada.
@Kanan how's the 2018 FIFA World Cup playing out ITTL?
I know nothing about soccer haha if I have free time I'll fine one research
Bluntly, this wouldn't have persisted up until the present.
The veto of the People's Budget led to a constitutional crisis. If the Lords won, then the incredibly Conservative dominated Lords would be able to veto literally anything and everything vaguely radical.
And that's guaranteed a revolution. Now, if Kanan wants to do an authoritarian far-right Britain where revolts are crushed mercilessly, that's interesting in of itself, but as it stands, it makes absolutely no sense at all.
Again - the Lords no longer have veto power. Perhaps I used the wrong verbiage. The intent was to show that Burnham is trying to deal with Northern Ireland in some way and the Lords are throwing some speedbumps along the way.
Remember this Britain views Atlee as the greatest Prime Minister in history and Thatcher never came along and dismantled the state.
