I don't want to derail the discussion much further so I'll leave it with this for now.
The Ottoman Navy has nothing that can compete with the Averof, especially considering the subpar training and upkeep of their naval vessels. Sure, could the Ottomans get a lucky hit on the Averof? Of course, but it's highly unlikely and when they did go head to head the Averof was able to "cross the T" twice without suffering any significant damage. They need an EXTREMELY lucky scenario to take out the Greek Fleet. Onto the Ottoman Army, I don't say this lightly or without evidence that the Ottoman Army cannot hold the Istanbul-Salonika railway. The forces left between Salonika and the Ergene River amounted to 1 Regular Division (the size of a bulgarian brigade) 1 Regular infantry regiment and some assorted militia and redif units, opposed by 2 Bulgarian divisions (the size of an Ottoman Corp each!). I feel to make the best of a bad situation would be to not defend the region at all and use the forces in the East and West armies. Speaking of Anatolian Units it's going to be late November early December before a significant number of forces (mostly untrained) arrive in Thrace so the Ottomans are going to need to hold off the Bulgarians that long, which is possible but difficult and even then the Turks won't be ready for offensive operation until at least February, possibly later.
Hasan Tahsin also get a bad rap, he wasn't a great military commander but his strategy at Yenidje was the best possible action given the overwhelming odds against him, the downside being was when the armies left flank broke they were totally unable to hold the Vardar river line, opening up Salonika to the Greeks (Salonika's "fortress" was to defend from sea invasion and it's land defenses were non-existent.) Now all this is coming from someone who really would like to see Ottoman success in the war and only points this out to show the real issues the Ottomans need to overcome and that its not a simple matter of a flip of a coin in a battle.