Something doesn't quite seem right with the deaths and casualty progression charts when combined. I think it might be that the Ottomans had 250,000 casualties while the Bulgarians lost 1,000,000, but even combining the two segments of the Deaths chart gives the Bulgarians 33.3% of deaths to the Ottomans 35.3, which doesn't seem to match the Bulgarians having 4 times more casualties, even given civilian deaths assuming roughly equal deaths/wounded ratios (I think that ~750,000 civilians being wounded/killed would have been mentioned in the story, which is the figure drawn if all 250,000 Ottomans casualties were military combined with the Ottomans take 35.3% of the deaths which would translate to ~230,000 Bulgarian military deaths with 33.3% of military deaths being Bulgarian, which leaves ~760,000 unaccounted for). Additionally, you'd think a figure like 2 in 20 would be simplified into 1 in 10 on a chart like this.
It's actually all casualty figures which means it includes reported wounds, captives, interned civilians etc which accounts for the extremely high ratio for Bulgaria especially considering their civil war.Something doesn't quite seem right with the deaths and casualty progression charts when combined. I think it might be that the Ottomans had 250,000 casualties while the Bulgarians lost 1,000,000, but even combining the two segments of the Deaths chart gives the Bulgarians 33.3% of deaths to the Ottomans 35.3, which doesn't seem to match the Bulgarians having 4 times more casualties, even given civilian deaths assuming roughly equal deaths/wounded ratios (I think that ~750,000 civilians being wounded/killed would have been mentioned in the story, which is the figure drawn if all 250,000 Ottomans casualties were military combined with the Ottomans take 35.3% of the deaths which would translate to ~230,000 Bulgarian military deaths with 33.3% of military deaths being Bulgarian, which leaves ~760,000 unaccounted for). Additionally, you'd think a figure like 2 in 20 would be simplified into 1 in 10 on a chart like this.
But it is nice to see it laid out like this, it makes the figures mentioned much more clear.
Just being pedantic.
It's the Swedish speaking FinnsI don't think the Finns would want to be ruled by the Swedes since they have a history of being under Sweden's rule even if they dislike the Russian rule and hope to know more about Mexico.
He probably would be considering his life.Aleister Crowley will be very disappointed at the cult suppressions, in between the mountain climbing and Thelema.
Horror novel material for the future writerAs a result, it should not be surprising that the Ottoman Government calls the 1920s to be the golden era of the Occult and Cults in the Ottoman Empire. Like most cultic golden eras, the number of their cases never really grew more than 1000 per year, but their high level publicity still made them extremely visible in Ottoman history. So much so that Mustafa Kemal Pasha had to devote his time to the creation of an anti-Cult squad in the Ottoman Police Force which were used to suppress these cults and occultists in the 1930s to the brink of extinction under the ODSP and CUP governments that followed
Indeed it is!Horror novel material for the future writer
Sounds like a Sudeten Crisis to me.This was the starting of the Ostrobothnian Crisis in Northern Europe…….”
True but if/when they do win or gain independent, I don't know how the non-Swedish speaking Finns will react to it though...It's the Swedish speaking Finns
more like the Turkish Crisis of otl 1923 reallySounds like a Sudeten Crisis to me.
the ethnic finns are going to be in an interesting place due to the revolt ittlTrue but if/when they do win or gain independent, I don't know how the non-Swedish speaking Finns will react to it though...
I think Aaland should be like a place where both Sweden and Finland can be cooperative with each other as well as a sort of DMZ place.That said Sweden is now going to be caught between a very hard place with the revolt of ethnic swedes in Finland.