Since when did we claim it? We just call ourselves Americans, and considering the name of our country, the United States of America, there aren't exactly many other (polite) ways to shorten that.
And besides, I'd like you to define imperialism, just so I know where you define it. You'd be surprised how many South American nations can be accused of "imperialism" depending on the definition.
Dean: witch words someone chooses to use implies an ideological election as well as a linguistic one. It's subtle, but not unimportant. When a way to call a country and the people born in that country is chosen by those with
liguinstic capital witch is closly related to
political capital such a decision is in no way an inocent one. Generations later, when people get used to call a country such a way they are, probably without knowing, supporting the ideology - or the legacy of such ideology - witch created such a linguistic
and ideological choice centuries ago. Without realizing, that's nearly always for sure, but supporting it nonetheless.
For example, when someone refer's to Latin America as "
America's
backyard" for instance, is not only implying that one country counts for an entire continent (witch you might not think today as I assume that you guys are told that the continent is called America
s, but I highly doubt that it was called like that in the 18th century), it's also implying that Latinamerica
belongs to the USA. Why? because in the election of such a metaphor refers the subcontinent to something that it's owned: if you have a house, the backyard is part of your property, with all it's other connotations. It's not all the same as saying, ie, "USA's neighbours". The difference is ideological and, therefore, political.
As for imperialism, I agree with you. There's probably imperialism in every continent. But of course, it requires more than blindness to not note that the USA is one of the mayor imperialistic countries in the last hundred years. Not the only one, but one of the most important, for sure. And once you notice what imperialism means when you aren't precisely in the imperial capitol, you would hardly call
any imperialist power "something good for the world". And I'm not intending to be flamish here. It's just that somethings - like torture and starvation - are simply wrong by definition.