%Well, given the precise time and in what context that was chosen (by Stalin) to bring it up, I'd think that it, perhaps, may be intended a way to pressure to the Greek government and their British allies...Hmm, is it at all possible that Russia snipes Constantinople before the Greeks can get there once the tides of war turn?
Well, let's hope Churchill doesn't throw Greece under the bus here.And speaking of Greece the Soviet government would like to settle the outstanding issues in Greece and Turkey in an amicable manner. Starting with the future status of the straits of course. This is of utter importance to the Soviet government..."
I think it's more the soviets making sure their navy can sail out of Constantinople more than anything. I don't think the soviets can contest an Wally held Constantinople.Well, let's hope Churchill doesn't throw Greece under the bus here.
Precisely!German strategic doctrine since Prussia has been “win on the decisive front at all costs and the rest will take care of itself”.
Ironically I think the most dangerous time for Greece will be after whenever TTL Kursk equivalent is. At that moment Germany will realize “winning” on the Eastern Front in one campaign is not possible and may just send extra forces during a lull to try to end minor fronts elsewhere. 10 divisions is barely a drop in the bucket in the East but would be huge in Greece and Smyrna. It will depend of course on what else is happening in regards to Italy, Turkey, North Africa, and France though if by that point Greece is still the only front left.
Which can have a chance to backfire in the future. The fact that Stalin mentioned the matter and possible regime change should alarm Churchill and Roosevelt over his type of behavior. Soviets post war status could possibly get weakened because of this matter.%Well, given the precise time and in what context that was chosen (by Stalin) to bring it up, I'd think that it, perhaps, may be intended a way to pressure to the Greek government and their British allies...
The Axis cannot suffer a defeat in detail in the soviet front. But the Allies can inflict a defeat in detail in the turkish theater of operations. A sensible policy would have been to abandon Cilicia as soon as Alexandretta was captured. The Taurus forms an excellent bastion that would allow them to economize forces for the Caucasus. But with choosing to fight in Cilicia they are facing a superior opponent with significantly more and better armor. Bethuart and Slim are very good generals and Slim had excellent situational awareness. They also have superior tanks compared to OTL. Therefore, I think that the Battle of Cilicia will be very costly for Turkey in terms of experienced manpower and material.Defeat in Detail window closed for now for the Axis side. With Artvin under control the Black Sea and Caucasus fronts are now reliably connected.
Greek communists were willing to cede Thrace and Macedonia during the interwar years..So I’ve had a thought. If Turkey falls significantly earlier than the other axis powers, does it get a lighter peace deal? It’s already in a pretty shaky position, so it isn’t hard to see in falling a year or more before the rest. Does that get it a lighter peace deal, a harsher one, or does it even matter?
I will say that Stalins interaction here isn’t gonna win him any friends. I’m not sure if something similar happened OTL but it already shows his feelings for national sovereignty. Also if word of him trying to take Constantinople for himself reaches the Greek communists, it might cause a bit of a split in the group depending on how they view the city.
That is crazy! Were they willing to sell half their country just to rule the rump version of it?Greek communists were willing to cede Thrace and Macedonia during the interwar years..
Well the party saw that Macedonia and thrace were taken by greece in an imperialistic wayThat is crazy! Were they willing to sell half their country just to rule the rump version of it?
That was IOTL, when Greece had suffered the Asia Minor Catastrophe.Greek communists were willing to cede Thrace and Macedonia during the interwar years..
This method can also be applied to Bulgaria. Bulgaria has a higher chance of surrendering or being occupied by Greeks/British/etc then the Soviets in OTL. The lack of a land border/historical animosity with the Soviet Union helps unlike with Turkey.So I’ve had a thought. If Turkey falls significantly earlier than the other axis powers, does it get a lighter peace deal? It’s already in a pretty shaky position, so it isn’t hard to see in falling a year or more before the rest. Does that get it a lighter peace deal, a harsher one, or does it even matter?
The Macedonian Slavs were a key support group for the Greek Communists IOTL and likely ITTL as well, as nothing has really changed for them.We do not know what the popular base for the Left in Greece is in this timeline. That is important. Not sure if in the Smyrna/Izmir region the working class is mainly Greek. Probably Pontian Greek refugees, Anatolian Muslims, and local Jews but Lascaris probably can provide the ITL facts.
Considering everything else (Ionia) the Republicans (idk what to call them but Greece's a republic now sooooo) should be much bigger and it'd be less of a fight than otl considering the Republic of Greece is a regime the people of Greece want, and Greece's army should be much better than otl and they have a much better hand against both the communists and the Axis ittl.The Macedonian Slavs were a key support group for the Greek Communists IOTL and likely ITTL as well, as nothing has really changed for them.
We can call them liberalsConsidering everything else (Ionia) the Republicans (idk what to call them but Greece's a republic now sooooo) should be much bigger and it'd be less of a fight than otl considering the Republic of Greece is a regime the people of Greegce want, and Greece's army should be much better than otl and they have a much better hand against both the communists and the Axis ittl.